MatthewB
If the drinking lamp is lit, you should be too
- Sep 17, 2015
- 10,907
- 13,894
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- NY Yankees, Glenelg Adelaide Giants
I doubt it
Who would have thought we won yesterday, you never know
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I doubt it
Very true, but I reckon the upsets stopped after the Sydney game.Who would have thought we won yesterday, you never know
I know, Port will be to strong, but one can hopeVery true, but I reckon the upsets stopped after the Sydney game.
Norths only chance of a win is a similar bathwater drink by their opponents. Now Port are prone to it and if the results of yesterday went as expected It was more likely..... But they won't slip up today.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Is it right that Hawthorn didn’t use their medical sub?
If so, kind of ironic given Clarkson was the instigator of it so kudos for using it properly and not cheating like Geelong did with it.
We'll only find out if people cheated come round 2's team selection
I suspect we may have cheated ourselves with Luke Brown
I'd be surprised if we went that early with Brown on a stinking hot day.We'll only find out if people cheated come round 2's team selection
I suspect we may have cheated ourselves with Luke Brown
No... but it should be, and I think everyone other than the coaches will agree with you.Is the rule that the player subbed out can’t be selected the following week?
If not it should be. Though that still lets you take off your worst player who you were going to drop next week anyway. Will the AFL check the medical records of each club to ensure the player subbed out had a proper medical reason?
I would have thought that would be expected behaviour?A question re Kayo.
Does anyone have trouble when they try and skip ahead or backwards during a replay? Unless you just skip once, it buffers for around 5-10 seconds. If you just skip once, it seems to only buffer for a second.
This happened last year as well. Does it happen to anyone else?
No,only players that come off concussed are unable to play for 12 days, like in Jake Kelly's case. This is not the case with any other injuries, though it should be. Already talk that Vlastuin will play this week after coming for a knee complaint on Thursday night.Is the rule that the player subbed out can’t be selected the following week?
If not it should be. Though that still lets you take off your worst player who you were going to drop next week anyway. Will the AFL check the medical records of each club to ensure the player subbed out had a proper medical reason?
What would be considered an upset between GWS and St Kilda today?Very true, but I reckon the upsets stopped after the Sydney game.
Norths only chance of a win is a similar bathwater drink by their opponents. Now Port are prone to it and if the results of yesterday went as expected It was more likely..... But they won't slip up today.
It's a 50/50 game imoWhat would be considered an upset between GWS and St Kilda today?
But, but Noble. It was exactly like us in the Craig years, dominate all year, finish top 2, no GF. Just an ingredient missing. Will be ok getting Roos out of the cellar though, steady ship is his go.
That is what I would have thought. Notice that a former player of ours in Paul Hunter is named to play today as well for the Saints.
Lol fox footy have declared aliir aliir the missing piece. Is that missing piece #501 now?