List Mgmt. 2021 Trade & List Management Thread II - IN: CCJ

[giantroo]

Spoiler: Lore's 2021 Draft Order

Spoiler: Lore's 2022 Future Picks Draft Order

 

[remfan101]

Some pretty interesting DFA options in Brander, O’Brien, Sier and Constable. The first two in particular fit our list needs and age demographic, although they also have obvious flaws in their games.

 

[Le Grille]

OBrien went to WB didn’t he

 

[giantroo]

TRADE WRAP SPECIAL: The sneaky winner, late curveball, more

Riley Beveridge and Cal Twomey dissect the Continental Tyres AFL Trade Period

www.afl.com.au

A bit on Dumont.
12:45 in.
Not likely to be back at Arden st.
Too good to be out of the system.

So the Dog's pick 23 and Pies pick 27 are on the trade table. Any chance we can move our 40's pick into that range?


42+ 47 = 711 points

Pick 23 = 815
Pick 27 = 703

 

[The Nostradamus]

OBrien went to WB didn’t he

That’s Tim obrien

he’s referring to lochie O’Brien who was a top 10 pick in the LDU/stevo/Bonar draft

 

[buttox]

So the Dog's pick 23 and Pies pick 27 are on the trade table. Any chance we can move our 40's pick into that range?

If GWS bid on Darcy before Daicos we have enough points now for pick 27.
Our late picks improve and 27 stays the same.
I doubt we have any chance at 23.
maybe 42+47+f3
But i doubt it

 

[roos 10]

If GWS bid on Darcy before Daicos we have enough points now for pick 27.
Our late picks improve and 27 stays the same.
I doubt we have any chance at 23.
maybe 42+47+f3
But i doubt it

Either they give us 23or 27 or we bid on both

 

[Shinboner1]

So the Dog's pick 23 and Pies pick 27 are on the trade table. Any chance we can move our 40's pick into that range?


42+ 47 = 711 points

Pick 23 = 815
Pick 27 = 703

If we were to pick up any of the DFA's it would probably force us to do it.
Might have to throw in a future pick especially if we wanted 23.
CCJ, pick 1. 20,23 would be pretty amazing for us though.

 

[Le Grille]

So the Dog's pick 23 and Pies pick 27 are on the trade table. Any chance we can move our 40's pick into that range?


42+ 47 = 711 points

Pick 23 = 815
Pick 27 = 703

If it balances out what’s the major benefit to do it on their part, if they trade it they lose it, if they need it they’ll lose it. Is it a case of asking for a favour

 

[buttox]

If it balances out what’s the major benefit to do it on their part, if they trade it they lose it, if they need it they’ll lose it. Is it a case of asking for a favour

If we do it as a live trade we don't even have to mention bidding.
wink wink nudge nudge.

 

[Shinboner1]

If it balances out what’s the major benefit to do it on their part, if they trade it they lose it, if they need it they’ll lose it. Is it a case of asking for a favour

getting future picks for early 20s that would be dissolved by matching bids?

 

[Le Grille]

getting future picks for early 20s that would be dissolved by matching bids?

But the trade discussed is 42 and 47 in the current draft for current picks

now if we bundled one current and one future pick I see that, but does that impact the ability to make up the point

 

[buttox]

getting future picks for early 20s that would be dissolved by matching bids?

Maybe. But they also need to take 3 players this year.
Getting extra points and not eating up all the 40s picks would be ideal for them.
Something with picks from both years would probably be what they are after.

 

[giantroo]

 

[AnEmptyChair]

LOL I wonder if KM still thinks Gleeson is a walk up start at North Melbourne.

 

[King Corey]

Thought he retired 5 years ago.

 

[Lomas]

Thought he retired 5 years ago.

Na, that was when the drugs wore off.

 

[King Corey]

Na, that was when the drugs wore off.

It probably doesn't help him but he could probably walk straight into Brisbane or Melbourne's calendar lineups.

 

[The Y Factor]

So - anyone tracking where we are for list spots?

 

[Lomas]

It probably doesn't help him but he could probably walk straight into Brisbane or Melbourne's calendar lineups.

Has more of the advanced hair, just come off a jetski look, in my opinion.

 

[King Corey]

Has more of the advanced hair, just come off a jetski look, in my opinion.

He'd be top 2 on either of those lists then.

In fact he's Pierce ****ing Brosnan against some of the chaps on the Brisbane list.

 

[Lomas]

He'd be top 2 on either of those lists then.

In fact he's Pierce ****ing Brosnan against some of the chaps on the Brisbane list.

We just lost Taz, so best to keep our powder dry.

 

[King Corey]

We just lost Taz, so best to keep our powder dry.

He's safe. Our calendar standards are generally elite.

 

[buttox]

So - anyone tracking where we are for list spots?

If we re contract Campbell, Ham, Dumont and Atley we can take 3 picks in all drafts total.
Every extra pick means another person delisted.
The least picks we could take at the national draft is 2. If we upgrade Edwards to the main list as our third.
Tom Lynch means another player delisted.
We don't know what is happening with that.
Hope this helps.

 

[Lomas]

He's safe. Our calendar standards are generally elite.

You're right. We are the thinking person's crumpet, too.

 

[giantroo]