- May 23, 2019
- 14,210
- 35,757
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Coleman vs Ed Richard’s?
Keep an eye on Richards in the AAMI match, but I reckon he could be just as good as Coleman.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Coleman vs Ed Richard’s?
He’s much better playing behind the ball as a running half back and that’s where he’ll be playing by the look of it.63 games with no upswing to speak off. Does Ed Richards have a more lucrative SC role this year?
View attachment 1335110
63 games with no upswing to speak off. Does Ed Richards have a more lucrative SC role this year?
View attachment 1335110
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He’s much better playing behind the ball as a running half back and that’s where he’ll be playing by the look of it.
Concerns are injuries and not sure he’ll get any kick ins compared to Coleman.
Dawson & PetraccaCrisp and Brayshaw
V
Dawson and Petracca
Are things that desperate ? ....Curnow vs Brodie vs Ralpho

Richard's always been swung around a lot and he's just not nearly as good in the forward line or on the wing. If he's consistently played in the back line, he'll score well for his price.
Curnow easily for me.Curnow vs Brodie vs Ralpho
+1.Curnow easily for me.
Me three!Curnow easily for me.
me four!Me three!
depends on cashRowell or Berry?
Davies or JFH?
RowellRowell or Berry?
Davies or JFH?
Stewart + Crisp + Caldwell + Treloar + Curnow
vs
Sicily + Hewett + Oliver + Heeney/DeGoey/Bailey + Maginess
What's it look like, something like this?
105 + 105 + 85 + 100 + 70 = 465
vs
95 + 95 + 120 + 95 + 50 = 455
I think Caldwell probably about 10 points overrated in the first so gap isn't really there in scoring imo.Stewart + Crisp + Caldwell + Treloar + Curnow
vs
Sicily + Hewett + Oliver + Heeney/DeGoey/Bailey + Maginess
What's it look like, something like this?
105 + 105 + 90 + 100 + 70 = 470
vs
95 + 95 + 120 + 95 + 50 = 455
90 down to 85 for Caldwell is still too high.![]()
I think Caldwell probably about 10 points overrated in the first so gap isn't really there in scoring imo.
Cash gen better on the 1st and is overall less risky. 2nd has potential to be 4 keepers but could be stuck with sub-par options if Hewett and Sicily are neither here nor there.
Think a lot of people will start Curnow as well, could be a dangerous negative pod if he quickly shoots up 200k.
Second option assuming Magginess plays. Don't like Caldwell and Treloar as picks, and Stewart (Stewart + Crisp + Caldwell + Treloar + Curnow
vs
Sicily + Hewett + Oliver + Heeney/DeGoey/Bailey + Maginess
What's it look like, something like this?
105 + 105 + 85 + 100 + 70 = 465
vs
95 + 95 + 120 + 95 + 50 = 455
) and Crisp are priced at their maximum.Berry versus Caldwell ?Caldwell is getting a pure midfield role. They're giving midfield minutes to him over McGrath, that says a lot I reckon. I reckon he averages 85-95, he just needs to stay fit.
He's just a stepping stone, with the extra trades I'm happy to take him. Even an 80 average with a couple big scores in Bombers wins gets him to $400k, all I need