Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2023 List Management thread - Pt2 Now With Added Wailing & Gnashing of Teeth

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Honestly though, the cost on trading up / into the top 5 in the draft though starts to make it all muddy. Like, we could literally not get pick 1 or 2 this year with what we paid for Jackson and we paid an absolutely stupid amount. How does that make sense, how is it cheaper to bring in guaranteed elite young talent than an untried draftee.

Sure, prioritise the draft, but when you think you have a core, it's cheaper to bring in superstars if you can convince them to join then drafting them
Yes I do think Jackson is the perfect exception as above, purely because we didn't have to totally **** the salary cap to get him to come.

Contrast with what we'd have to have offered Naughton for example.
 
Also, in light of that offer to Naughton, can you imagine what the deal that successfully lures McDonald next year would look like? Shudder at the thought.
Just wait for what's gonna get dangled in front of Amiss in the next couple of years.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Just wait for what's gonna get dangled in front of Amiss in the next couple of years.
He's going to get $2m offers towards the end of his current contract.

Whatever we are paying him, it's going to be a bargain in 2027-2029. Hope we extend him for life in 2026 or similar.
 
Apparently the midfield is set, so someone is making the judgement that they are good enough already and we don't need more midfielders. I can't see it.
Those are 2 different questions though, right? Like I think on performances this season you can clearly see that the midfield isn't good enough yet. However, you look at the pieces: Brayshaw, Serong, Young, whatever we get from Brodie, Fyfe, Jaeger and Aish, and then young guns like Erasmus, Johnson, and a couple more speculative younger guys like Stanley and NOD. I think the pieces are there that we don't need another inside mid at least, especially given where we'll be picking from in the draft.

I don't love the wing talent in that group (becomes a bit better if we get Sharp), but if we can't make a good midfield out of that group then I'm looking at the coaching.
 
Snuffaluphagus Now I must admit I thought contract length was already factored in, maybe this increases the chance of Hamling triggering compensation after all..

LEAGUE TO PONDER COMPENSATION CHANGES​

THE AFL is set to assess whether it begins to consider the length of a contract in its free agency compensation formula.

Currently, while a restricted free agent must be offered a minimum two-year deal to trigger free agency compensation, the final length of the contract is not a factor in deciphering which band is triggered.

It means that, hypothetically, a three-year deal activates the same band of free agency compensation as a five-year contract provided the financial terms across the offer are the same.

But, while it will not be introduced ahead of this year's free agency window that opens on Friday, the League is pondering whether the length of a contract becomes part of its formula in deciding free agency compensation in the future.

The AFL currently has a detailed points-based formula that decides free agency compensation, which considers a range of factors including the financial terms of the deal and the age of the player moving clubs among others.

Clubs losing players are made aware of the compensation being offered with 24 hours of a restricted free agency deal being lodged, with that package then made official if a choice is made not to match a rival club's bid.

Clubs are not allowed to alter the terms of any restricted free agency deal throughout the life of its contract. – Riley Beveridge
 
Those are 2 different questions though, right? Like I think on performances this season you can clearly see that the midfield isn't good enough yet. However, you look at the pieces: Brayshaw, Serong, Young, whatever we get from Brodie, Fyfe, Jaeger and Aish, and then young guns like Erasmus, Johnson, and a couple more speculative younger guys like Stanley and NOD. I think the pieces are there that we don't need another inside mid at least, especially given where we'll be picking from in the draft.

I don't love the wing talent in that group (becomes a bit better if we get Sharp), but if we can't make a good midfield out of that group then I'm looking at the coaching.
I would agree we don't need a pure inside mid type as we hopefully have that covered. To compete for a flag though we need an explosive type of mid that can bust a game open, and for sure a better archetypal winger.
I hope O'Driscoll only stalled because of injury, him coming on could help us.
 

This is a clever move by JL.

North or Geelong can't make an offer, if they can't find him.

Hoping we get a "where in the world" Sean Darcy episode
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Four years with a trigger for a 5th.
Cracking Up Lol GIF by HULU

 
Four years with a trigger for a 5th.
Cracking Up Lol GIF by HULU


Everyone else turned them down so they got desperate.

How many years for Massimo I wonder?
 
Haha you said that about the forwards as well but vise versa.

They will too. We need some natural development and both groups will make the other look better.

I think our midfield could make it very easy to be a forward, now we just need some forwards who make it look easy.

Watson makes it look easy
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Bro how tf can you say that? Stanley hasn't played 5 games for us yet and Ras is only 19. Ras definitely needs to start showing more but let's wait until the end of next season before passing judgement.

On that, did Stanley not qualify for peel finals ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top