No ways he gets 4 years .. I would be shocked if he got that
Might have traded off some money for long term security. If that's the case I don't mind it. Even if he gets pushed out of the first team you need a good backup ruck.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
No ways he gets 4 years .. I would be shocked if he got that
If true, Austin needs to be let go. 4 years is crazyHearing from a good source, Pittonet signed for another 4 years.
Sent from my SM-N981B using Tapatalk
I'd be pissed offIf true, Austin needs to be let go. 4 years is crazy
Not if his partner is not hanging around and/or the price is right. Clearly our MO is to seek discount for extra tenure.If true, Austin needs to be let go. 4 years is crazy
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No current season stats available
I've liked all of Austins moves and last year I was more than content with his decisions. I just don't think he's really gone out on a whim since he arrived and taken any big risks. I'd like us to trade some of our own this year for more bites at the draft and look at poaching some under contract players if possible.Last off-season he took 3 picks inside 32 and managed to bring in a best 22 player in a position of need. We were also on an upward trajectory so it was very unlikely we made many big moves in moving on players.
Before that we made some of the biggest off-season moves with Cerra, Saad, Hewett, Williams. I wouldn’t be calling what we have done conservative.
12 over 30 last year didn't seem too problematicNot sure why TDK would choose Geelong, sure he would be number one ruck but there list age profile is scary. 11 players 30 plus with most of them over 32, sure they have some good players, but I think this team is bottom 6 next year. Haven’t been overly impressed with the talent they have under there ageing stars either. Danger being out exposed how pedestrian there midfield is without him.
I’m not really sure, you don’t want to be letting go of your best and most needed talents, possibly someone might have to be traded to gain what we need?You say manufacture a trade .. who would you trade that can yield a second or third rounder without selling off a top 10 player
Mate I'd have him in the magoos from this week, never to return and chow baby at the end of the year.Would let McGovern go at the end of the year. He is a conditional player and needs to go.
Hearing from a good source, Pittonet signed for another 4 years.
Sent from my SM-N981B using Tapatalk
You say manufacture a trade .. who would you trade that can yield a second or third rounder without selling off a top 10 player
What if it's at 250k?If true, Austin needs to be let go. 4 years is crazy
Kennedy would also likely net us a decent pick if we did go down that path.Od say TDK would get is Geelongs 1st at 15, not sure if anything else.
Fisher might get you WCE 3rd round pick at 37
Gov might get you a 3rd round pick at Port
Dow might get a late 3rd or early 4th
I don’t think any of those are top 10 based on previous output.
We all know it won't be at that price. 4 years is too long if true
Heard that, very interestingHoyney on the side of Voss and where we’re falling down.
Do the players have the gumption (and skills) to pull through….


Agree re not blinking an eye. In fact I'd be happy to move on Cripps and hope Cripps puts his hand up at the end of the year and asks to be traded.Our leaders aren't leading and they aren't not coaching on field.
Doc has some coaching nous. He should be captain again and behind the ball.
Weitering and Young deserved to be dropped and if it weren't for Sam Durdin being injured, he and Kemp should come in.
I think Walsh is professional enough to be our future captain.
Our end of year cleanout needs to be huge and I'd throw some kids in for the experience. Our season is going nowhere.
I wouldn't blink an eye at trading out Cripps, Weitering or McKay at this stage. Each are worn down or have deficiencies that won't be overcome. They are all on long term contracts though, and we'd need a team to come courting with a promise of finals and professionalism.
Unfortunately I agreeAgree re not blinking an eye. In fact I'd be happy to move on Cripps and hope Cripps puts his hand up at the end of the year and asks to be traded.
We aren't winning a premiership with this guy as our captain
Agree on TDk and I would be rapt if we got thatOd say TDK would get is Geelongs 1st at 15, not sure if anything else.
Fisher might get you WCE 3rd round pick at 37
Gov might get you a 3rd round pick at Port
Dow might get a late 3rd or early 4th
I don’t think any of those are top 10 based on previous output.
No current season stats available
Out of your list only really Kennedy might get you a third rounder hence why I said we might need to lose a decent player to get back into 1st -3rd round .. it’s hard with our list becaue the gap between good and poor is huge and I am a bit like you where I don’t want to lose a cripps or mckay but we have to thibk outside the square to restructure the listI’m not really sure, you don’t want to be letting go of your best and most needed talents, possibly someone might have to be traded to gain what we need?
Our problem is a chunk of the kid/players drafted throughout the current rebuild have either not come on for different reasons or have been poor picks in general, unfortunately we don’t possess much depth with players possibly seeking more opportunities who have trade capital in a good draft range…
Not many of this list has the potential for gaining you very much of what we require pick range wise for a range of reasons…
(Silvagni) (Dow) O’Brien (Kennedy) Fogarty (McGovern) Carroll Plowman *Martin *Marchbank (Fisher) *Cuningham *Philp Honey S.Durdin Mirkov
A REMINDER FOR THE PINECONES
This bloke is not our problem.
As highlighted perfectly by Buckley and Brown - Tom Mitchell is there to play as an inside extractor, not to run. We don't have runners around Cripps, we have plodders. We have about 4 good runners in the whole team. 3/4 of Collingwoods entire team are fast, powerful runners.
Richmond should have traded Dusty back in 2016 when he was being found out for his defensive ability and transition running too!Ahhhh, yes, he is certainly part of our problem.
No they shouldn't have. Dusty was 24 years old and killing it. Cripps is 28 and slow, can't kick goals, his leadership is questionable, does nothing with the youth on our list and is only going to get slower.Richmond should have traded Dusty back in 2016 when he was being found out for his defensive ability and transition running too!
We lack the Lambert's.
Firstly, Cripps is currently labouring. Last year he kicked 20 goals and won a Brownlow and was being talked up as one of the best leaders in the competition for half the year.No they shouldn't have. Dusty was 24 years old and killing it. Cripps is 28 and slow, can't kick goals, his leadership is questionable, does nothing with the youth on our list and is only going to get slower.
I like Cripps, but don't see him as a good fit with all the other holes we have.
You talk about building a team around him of runners like what Collingwood have, well how many years do you want to do that?