Better Loosen Up
Brownlow Medallist
The points value system is okay. I just think it's flawed when discounts are involved.
Give clubs access to their academy players across the board in any round, no problem, but make them pay extra point value at say +30% in round one, +20% round two etc etc.
Clubs shouldn't have both 'access' and 'discount' associated with players.
No points deficit pushing into the following season - period.
GC will get Walter, Rogers & Edwards arguably at 2, 9 & 14 or a points value of 5417 add the discount and they essentially get pick 16-17 credited points value. That's rubbish.
Adding a cost of early access means they need to fork out pick 7-8 in points value & trade accordingly.
As an example, we have pick 2,3 and Sanders is a solid prospect as our academy investment. If say Essendon bid on him at 9 we would have the ability to match the bid +30% or picks 17 and 18 in this years draft but gain another 'top 10' player, albeit at a cost.
I'd be more than happy with a Curtin, McKercher, Sanders + whoever.
Why are people suggesting we still have Sanders? I thought we have been told by the AFL that won't be getting any sort of preferential access to him? The only way we get access to him is if he slips outside the top 40 which is not going to happen.




