Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
The further back our priority picks this year are pushed, the better Rawlings trading last year looks.
In:
Zac Fisher
Dylan Stephens
Pick 22 (Wil Dawson)
Pick 23 (Riley Hardeman)
Out:
Pick ~30
Pick ~31
Pick 29 (Ashton Moir)
I get Fisher and Stephens aren't great players and that we could have done a lot better, but you can see above we practically recruited them for nothing.
We did very well to turn those picks into Dawson and Hardeman, however this should highlight just how terrible our assistance was from the AFL last year.
Hahah **** off
Yes it means there’s one less hour for stupid posts ^I just realised that we lose an hour of trade period (not all states?), has that been factored into the schedule?
in that scenario we would just take Liam Baker ahead of the eagles in the PSDIt'll happen........guaranteed. CorruptFL don't want the tigs down for too long, bad for business(bonuses)
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Isn't that draft tampering???It'll happen........guaranteed. CorruptFL don't want the tigs down for too long, bad for business(bonuses)

Hahah **** off
Hahah **** off


And more importantly, don't pay him till you get to the other sideI watch a lot of footy.
But who the **** is Harry Perryman?
Hahah **** off
Not when the AFL are actively involved....then it's called "Like dealing with Geelong"Isn't that draft tampering???![]()
sounds like perfectly reasonable draft tampering, which would see both teams lose draft access in most sporting organisations around the world.
the fact a well known reporter is toting this without a please explain from the afl hierarchy, he should lose his accreditation.
Boom!!Or maybe the AFL is getting the reporter to raise this possibility to test the waters...
This gets more action than game day or any thing else.Yes it means there’s one less hour for stupid posts ^
I was just reviewing the first round of the 2017 draft and it’s interesting that it was a strong draft with one glaring failure in Paddy Dow. If you’re going to gloat about one of our draft misses, and there are a few, don’t choose the draft that you f*cked up and picked Paddy Dow over LDU.I dont come to gloat because we have our fair share of failures in drafting, but was just reviewing the 2017 draft and thought what a strong second round with one glaring failure in Will Walker, can honestly say i have never heard of him but the next 10 players taken are all guns, 6 All Australians.. Its interesting as 2017 would be considered one of the weaker top ends of the draft but obviously batted very deep.
View attachment 2131291
The real deal? Yeh? I dunno about thatClub has nailed just about all of its picks and we turned JHF into a fortune so why worry. Besides Draper is the reel deal.
100%in that scenario we would just take Liam Baker ahead of the eagles in the PSD
7 and 8 for 2 would be niceI just read the Saints are getting Band 1 compo for Battle, perhaps they trade 7 & 8 to us for 2 and (now) 24. They can get Draper if Richmond let him slide and we have a chance to select Trainor and Armstrong.
But he’s only got 2 good years left in himTwomey just mentioned we have a 5 year offer in front of Houston.
But he’s only got 2 good years left in him
The AFL is WWF- sanctioned gen the rules can rile for which ever dude they want to win.The secret herbs and spices rhetoric to cover AFL's arse when manipulating compensation pick's needs to go, the formula should be public knowledge, and any argument against it can only be made by pro AFL biased types.
in that scenario we would just take Liam Baker ahead of the eagles in the PSD
5 x 900 front load the shit out of itBut he’s only got 2 good years left in him
I can't see the Saints agreeing to that deal because it would be a huge loss for them (over 650pts) but who knows, on draft night they may have a particular player in mind and to move up the board, our pick 2 and a third rounder or future 3rd rounder may be enough.7 and 8 for 2 would be nice