Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Ok. General question though: does the fact that the points system is changing next year make our future picks more valuable than they would have been, at least to clubs eyeing father/son or academy players next year?Points don't mean shit unless you need points. No clubs in this scenario do. It's about what players will likely be available at those picks.
12/14 would be more valuable than that dealCarlton want 2 for Owies 12/14 ha ha
Carlton want 2 for Owies 12/14 ha ha
For potentially a top 3 pick for a 28 year old is stupid.It's hardly stupid to bring in a dual AA with a future pick, but I get you point...
On SM-G991B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Where is this reported?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
It could potentially be pick 6-9, and he's 27.For potentially a top 3 pick for a 28 year old is stupid.
Correct, points don't mean shit. But it works out better if they do. Or as you said, what players a club is after. If the draft runs deep as everyone is saying, and the top 10 is a similar level. Then a trade with St.Kilda: 2 for 7+8 may be comparable 8 for 3+4. All perception.Points don't mean shit unless you need points. No clubs in this scenario do. It's about what players will likely be available at those picks.
Pick 6-9?

Did Rawlings saw F1, or get something else in this draft? That's what i thought he said.....can't remember exactly thoughI wasn't saying what we would prefer, I was talking about Melbourne's tactics and the rumour that they were after pick 2. This looks unlikely at the moment, as they wouldn't need to go after pick 13 first to get it.
Rawlings has already said that we would be happy to drop down two or three spots if we could get a future first. Knowing this, Melbourne could just make that trade directly and save themselves the extra pick 28 required to go via pick 13.
So, with Parker, Houston, and to a lesser extent, Darling, and natural progression of the list, you can't see any improvement occurring?Pick 6-9? [emoji2957]
Fair call but Atley is 32 now and was never a needle mover.
Getting rid of senior players probably didn't do much for morale, but guys who were 28 or so, like Atley, Macmillan, even Polec and Pittard attracted no interest from other clubs (sorry to bring up Polec). And Dumont, Tarrant and earlier Bastinac did nothing at their new clubs.
Only Mason Wood and Ben Brown succeeded at other clubs. And Brown missed a lot of footy. Higgins was given opportunities at Geelong but couldn't cement a spot. Well done to Ryan Clarke for playing in a GF but he's gone too.
Essentially we had a big group of senior players who weren't good enough - there was going to be pain whichever way we went.
He won a flag so he was somewhat successful but yeah he certainly didn’t produce at melb what he did with us.I'd question BBB, think some bias there. Cost what nearly 4m for 4 yrs and played around 45 games and kicked around 60 odd goals over the 4 yrs.... did that 3 times per yr for us!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
1.9m over 4 years, but it's clear to all BB was cookedI'd question BBB, think some bias there. Cost what nearly 4m for 4 yrs and played around 45 games and kicked around 60 odd goals over the 4 yrs.... did that 3 times per yr for us!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
He said F1, though I'm sure we would rather split for two picks this year, unfortunately there are fewer options for that.Did Rawlings saw F1, or get something else in this draft? That's what i thought he said.....can't remember exactly though
So the same as Simpkin and LDU.. definitely no thanks. The last thing we need in our side is another poor kick in a side full of them.Watkins issues is his kicking can be very poor at times. Gun at getting the ball out though
The $4M over 4 years was what we'd offered and he rejected. He ended up getting less than half that from Melbourne. It was a George Costanza negotiation.I'd question BBB, think some bias there. Cost what nearly 4m for 4 yrs and played around 45 games and kicked around 60 odd goals over the 4 yrs.... did that 3 times per yr for us!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
We went from 3 wins to 3 wins with a worse percentage. They are justified.Gee a lot of people thinking we're not going to get out of the bottom 3 next year.
Might as well just not bother watching then..
Pretty sure it was 4x450kHe wanted 850k from us for 3.... thought he took 4 @750k at dees so 3m then
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com