Mr MysteryGuest
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2015
- Posts
- 11,632
- Reaction score
- 12,389
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
“Murphy , good user of it “
Yeah righto
Yeah righto
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Easy delist at EOY. Should’ve cut the cord last year IMOSchoenberg has lost the plot.
He's not AFL standard but hes quality at this levelGood footballer. Wish he was ours.
Very composed under huge pressure all afternoonEdwards must play AFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I saw him do a 12m pass that was called play on and put his teammate under the pumpUnusual for Murphy to go missing in the last quarter.
Neither willWith Draper and Nank not playing today and maybe not tomorrow, Nicks has the perfect reason to sneak Murphy and maybe even Smith back in next week....
When his parents flew over, assuming that he'd play SANFLSeems ludicrous to drop Nankervis after a period of poor form then sit him completely for a week
Of those, I'd keep Scholl as we can't draf enough players to replace everyone. Schoenburg is on eookie list IIRC so any rookie pick will do.Scholl, Murphy, Schoenberg, Strauchan, Smith, Burgess all should be delisted. Nowhere near AFL level.
Gallagher experiment is over.
Should see some decent turnover at the end of this season.
Depth wouldnt make Richmond's VFL side.
We should have won that in the last, with the wind change. However, we insisted on going for Burgess, which is fine in theory, but not when it was always four-on-one! What about using the outnumber elsewhere?The inside 50 kicking was the difference in the game
Adelaide aimed for Burgess, Sturt aimed for anyone in space
. I'd probably keep Burgess as insurance.Of those, I'd keep Scholl as we can't draf enough players to replace everyone. Schoenburg is on eookie list IIRC so any rookie pick will do.
Yeah they knew we had nothing up forward and just parked two blokes on him.We should have won that in the last, with the wind change. However, we insisted on going for Burgess, which is fine in theory, but not when it was always four-on-one! What about using the outnumber elsewhere?
Sholl is contracted Burgess is not.I'd probably keep Burgess as insurance.
Scholl types are a dime a dozen. Hes devoid of confidence and adds nothing anymore. No drive, no speed, soft and skills are off.
If I were coaching, I would have parked the Strachan bus at FF in the last to keep them occupied.Yeah they knew we had nothing up forward and just parked two blokes on him.
And Strachan was about as useful as an ashtray on motor bike today, I really don't get why they just didn't let him run out his contract as a waterboy or something.If I were coaching, I would have parked the Strachan bus at FF in the last to keep them occupied.