Look at the list profile .... that is age and games played.But you are ignoring what occurred prior like trading out of the 2020 draft where Holmes was taken
Trading 3 x 1st rounders and 2nd rounder for Taranto & Hopper
How can we say our rebuild is in year 5 when prior to 2024 draft our first selection was #40
2023 pick #40 & #43
2022 was pick #49 & #55
2021 was 4 selctions inside #30 which is the outlier
2020 was pick #40 & #51
So prior to 2024 the previous 4 years we only had 2 players selected inside pick #20 Gibcus #9 Brown #17
So effectively our rebuild started with the 2024 draft and 5 year rebuild expected to be completed after the 2028 draft if all things go well
Taranto and Hopper gave us two elite inside mids Pick 2 and 9 that are 28 and 29 yo with 150-200 games (which was a gap in the list from the dynasty)
I definitely think that Barker could be good value for a team though I keep reminding myself that only Duursma would have gone first round last year (others say Duursma, CDT, and Robey) so in a draft this weak you want the minimum picks not more.Unpopular opinion here, if we are going for need opposed to best talent, I would try to trade one of our picks for 7 and 8 and try to move up the draft board from 38 to get Barker or NHH.
A scenario where we get robey or CDT, then get 2 of taylor cumming grlj sharp lindsay, seems the best situation as well as Barker (wing) seems to like a great draft to fill holes. NHH would be great just very inconsistent thinking injuries may have cost him a bit.
An example is that we gave Retschko,a delisted rookie from last draft, a full list spot rather than try and get extra picks ... the club obviously doesn't rate this draft ... and Sonsie and Dow haven't been delisted because we are trying to work out whether any 2nd round picks are worth giving two years contracts to and the answer may be probably not






