- Jun 10, 2014
- 19,201
- 51,111
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
So now it's the nomenclature that bothers you? Seriously?You do realise we can start with the number 1 and we could have a round 25.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
So now it's the nomenclature that bothers you? Seriously?You do realise we can start with the number 1 and we could have a round 25.
You have to admit that Opening Round sounds pretty lame.So now it's the nomenclature that bothers you? Seriously?
It's funcked! Round 0. Genius......You have to admit that Opening Round sounds pretty lame.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
On what basis are you going with “AFL lack of competence”? Before you answer, turn your mind back to how the AFL was established, specifically the Commission, which had control of the game voluntarily ceded to it by the clubs. Things weren’t as good you might remember.Ideally, you have 20 teams and each team plays eachother once, with wildcard rounds and then finals. You end up only playing a few less games, but nothing dramatic. Players should be healthier, and the quality of the game should be better.
The AFLW should be playing at the same time. The last 4 weeks have felt like footy has ended, and personally, I have forgotten about AFLW games. Maybe the footy season is too long with AFLW extending it? Maybe AFLW games should be played exclusively on Sundays with no AFL game featured until their season ends?
I don't know, just throwing random things out there. Between AFLW, GWS, and now Tasmania, there's a huge amount of capital investment required by the AFL for years to come. My concern is the AFL lack competence, and may see the only way to fund this is to just prostitute the game for revenue
It should be called something like, Dozen Egg Round, Free Range Chicken Round or Anal Probe Round.You have to admit that Opening Round sounds pretty lame.
No, I'm not talking about the VFL of 40-50 years ago. Ross Oakley, in my opinion, established the foundation for what the AFL actually is today. He got the buy-in of all clubs, making them realise the survival and success of the competition relied on the bigger clubs basically supporting the smaller clubs. His tenure saw the development of a professional administration and a far stronger (financially) competition.On what basis are you going with “AFL lack of competence”? Before you answer, turn your mind back to how the AFL was established, specifically the Commission, which had control of the game voluntarily ceded to it by the clubs. Things weren’t as good you might remember.
But it does score some very unique sponsors.You have to admit that Opening Round sounds pretty lame.
Ok - so expand on “afl incompetence”?No, I'm not talking about the VFL of 40-50 years ago. Ross Oakley, in my opinion, established the foundation for what the AFL actually is today. He got the buy-in of all clubs, making them realise the survival and success of the competition relied on the bigger clubs basically supporting the smaller clubs. His tenure saw the development of a professional administration and a far stronger (financially) competition.
However, I don't think the AFL commission since Jackson has been as good as it should be, particularly given its significant position in Australian sport.
Ok - so expand on “afl incompetence”?
Subjective whining about things you don’t like.
- Opening round
- No FTA footy on Saturday
- Umpiring standard
- Fixture inconsistency
- Weak response to player behaviours
- Wild Card round
- Rule changes without proper consultation and testing
Ok I’ll bite
- Opening round
- No FTA footy on Saturday
- Umpiring standard
- Fixture inconsistency
- Weak response to player behaviours
- Wild Card round
- Rule changes without proper consultation and testing
It's more than the nomenclature. The Opening round concept hasn't worked as a marketing tool and it creates further inequality in the fixture with what it does in terms of byes and teams having played a game against teams that haven't in Round 1. It has become a 25 round season with half the teams getting their first bye before they've played a game - it's just silly. Keep the 25 week season and spread out the byes more appropriately within it.So now it's the nomenclature that bothers you? Seriously?
I think you’re overthinking it. Whether teams have an early bye in round zero or round 3 or 4 won’t have any material effect on the ladder at the end of the season.It's more than the nomenclature. The Opening round concept hasn't worked as a marketing tool and it creates further inequality in the fixture with what it does in terms of byes and teams having played a game against teams that haven't in Round 1. It has become a 25 round season with half the teams getting their first bye before they've played a game - it's just silly. Keep the 25 week season and spread out the byes more appropriately within it.
I think you’re overthinking it. Whether teams have an early bye in round zero or round 3 or 4 won’t have any material effect on the ladder at the end of the season.
I think it's a distinct advantage to have played a game the week before if you're playing a team who hasn't played since August/Sept.
Having only half the comp playing in opening round creates that situation and is a failed concept that doesn't seem to have a benefit. The extra week in the season obviously has a benefit but only hlaf th teams playing?
and because they are the love child of the afl and have many friends in high places at AFL houseWe get a prime time draw because we are the biggest pulling team in the AFL.
Cats get to play in Geelong at their boutique stadium.
You’d need a 12 volume thesisOk - so expand on “afl incompetence”?
So now it's the nomenclature that bothers you? Seriously?
Now you are just getting carried away. And it would be wasteful to schedule all the "local derby" games in the opening round. Those games are big draws throughout the season.There was no need for another gimmick and not having all teams playing. Completely unnecessary.
Round 1 is about hope for the upcoming season. It should be exciting and fresh.
The round 1 fixture should have all teams playing in their home state. No one wants to go and watch their team in their first home game when they already 0-1.
I'm glad that we're a club who plays in opening round - as I do think it's an advantage for R1 if you play a team that didn't play the week before.Agree there’s no real benefits but I disagree that it’s actually creating any material disadvantages either. The byes are ridiculously early in the year for all teams.
People don’t like opening round because they don’t like it. I think the pushback is a little overblown. I personally don’t give a rats either way as long as the travelling Vic clubs aren’t the same every year ( ie not us)
Lots of people would agree.Subjective whining about things you don’t like.
Great minds think alike and fools rarely differ.Lots of people would agree.
Hear hear.You do realise we can start with the number 1 and we could have a round 25.