- Thread starter
- #101
B Montgomery wasn’t very tall, so his so around the same size? Might be why he was overlooked.
Louie is 184cm and built like a brick like his old man.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Hawthorn v Adelaide - Rd 11 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Hawks at 66% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 11 Games
Soccer Notice Image
Champions League - FINAL - PSG v Arsenal ⚽ Europa Semis ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - SEMIS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ FA Cup - Man City Win
B Montgomery wasn’t very tall, so his so around the same size? Might be why he was overlooked.
Bamert with 23 disposals and 1.0 today.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Fisher was better. Not sure where Bamert would fit.
Can he kick and is he aggressive/competitive?Bamert is 19. You aren’t picking him as a ready made option, your picking him on his upside potential as he is a powerful athlete and good runner.
Long term, he could play on any line. Half forward, midfield or half back. Has different athletic attributes that suits a variety of roles.
For me though, I’d be picking him as a midfielder who can push forward. He is on the taller side (186cm) and covers the ground really well.
We don’t have a lot of midfield depth, so it would make sense to have another mid on the last developing in the twos.
Bambert plays like a little wrecking ballBamert is 19. You aren’t picking him as a ready made option, your picking him on his upside potential as he is a powerful athlete and good runner.
Long term, he could play on any line. Half forward, midfield or half back. Has different athletic attributes that suits a variety of roles.
For me though, I’d be picking him as a midfielder who can push forward. He is on the taller side (186cm) and covers the ground really well.
We don’t have a lot of midfield depth, so it would make sense to have another mid on the last developing in the twos.
Can he kick and is he aggressive/competitive?
Sounds good, when I think of needed list traits, mongrel is at the top of the listHe has a nice left peg, booming kick, but needs to work on his short kicking. Can be prone to throwing it on the boot under pressure.
Competitiveness and aggressiveness are big big ticks. He loves the tough stuff.
Dawson is rucking because Tarrant isn't any good at it; too slight in the upper body. Good player, hope he gets a crack, but it won't be as a second ruck.Personally I think they should put Thredgold on LTI and take Tarrant.
As you can use him in a potential CCJ role down the track in the AFL as CCJ won’t be at North in 2027.
Well CCJ can’t ruck either and has no Skill level at all but Tarrant has upside where CCJ doesn’tDawson is rucking because Tarrant isn't any good at it; too slight in the upper body. Good player, hope he gets a crack, but it won't be as a second ruck.
Who is the over age player from the Falcons being talked up as a MSD prospect?
Probably be Jett Elek. He played the vic country trials on the weekend supposedly played really well. 201cm raw key forward/2nd ruck. Has a good athletic profile.
I like Dow from our VFL. For midfield depth.
Elek = the sparkAnd a great name...
He's a Jett!And a great name...
A 201cm key forward ruck in the MSD, what could go wrong?Probably be Jett Elek. He played the vic country trials on the weekend supposedly played really well. 201cm raw key forward/2nd ruck. Has a good athletic profile.
A 201cm key forward ruck in the MSD, what could go wrong?
It's kind of a similar situation to Edwards too...didn't have the best top age year, comes back a bit more physically mature, and starts marking the ball better. He has been consistently finding the footy in the Talent League though.
Rnd 1: 18 disposals, 8 marks, 1 goal
Rnd 2: 12 disposals, 3 marks, 4 goals
Rnd 3: 16 disposals, 8 marks, 1 goal
Rnd 4: 12 disposals, 3 marks, 0.3
More of these types mean it's more likely Bamert is available.
The club wont have missed it, kills two birds with one stone also.
Best case scenario is getting a best available in the MSD and from your own program. As it incentivises future recruits to come here knowing we recruit from our own system. Similar to the Dogs have done continually.
Trembath and Bamert in consecutive years is good marketing for our VFL program.
Thredgold is still nowhere near a football field.
Still intrigued why we didn't just list Bamert when we had the chance.