VelvetSledge
Brownlow Medallist
- May 24, 2007
- 18,296
- 38,384
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Liverpool FC, Melbourne Storm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He wouldn’t be a Caddy if he was humble.He is going bto be a star, and the young fella seems quite humble and a nice kid but doesn't seem to get much love from his team mates. A few times I have seen him celebrtate a goal and try to get everyone going and no one gets over to him. A bit strange.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Came on to say the same thing about him running under the ball quite often. Due to his reach and strength he could probably get away with it at junior level but it gets found out at AFL level and gives the defender an easy spoilHis timing in the air comes and goes
Im hoping that improves as he gets stronger, but some weeks he just doesn’t hold his ground and gets under the ball all night
He's 8 years older. That's quite a few years.I think Son of SOS owned him today. He is not better than Caddy imo but he has become naturally stronger because he has had a few more years in the system. 1st year Caddy would smash 1st year Jack imo. It sort of reminds me of the battles elder SOS had with Lloyd had early days before the Velvet Sledgehammer owned him.
He is not going to be a big body guy in my view. He will be the mobile forward. Runs hard. Takes some marks in space. Second and third effort. We just need a FF. Maybe May could be that guy as he looks to be more the big body marking type. If we have May at FF and Wright as second ruck / FP Caddy can roam around and use his running ability and at times play like a tall small forward.He's got that early Joe thing going on, dosent take long to realise if you knock him off his run early it disrupts him enough to ruin his chance at the mark. Who knows , he might not ever become a body guy, will just need to have smarter leading patterns and helpful blocking teammates
Reckon should give him a couple preseasons before we start judging who's got a body or not. That comes in time. Curnow looked nothing like he looks now when he was starting out.
Nate has a natural goal sense and ability to form things out of nowhere. Experience and body is the last piece of the puzzle.
I reckon Curnow looked plenty like he does now, he was always a hulking frame with wide shoulders
Yeah don’t disagree here. N Riewoldt/Jezza/Buddy would be the types, oversized HFF who can destroy their opponent with athleticism/repeat running/agility, not a hulking wrestle type.He is not going to be a big body guy in my view. He will be the mobile forward. Runs hard. Takes some marks in space. Second and third effort. We just need a FF. Maybe May could be that guy as he looks to be more the big body marking type. If we have May at FF and Wright as second ruck / FP Caddy can roam around and use his running ability and at times play like a tall small forward.
Nope, was wiry/lanky. If you mean long arms, yes. Caddy has a similar frame and gait which is why he was so likened to him. But we're talking body mass, and that's not the frame, that comes with time. Charlie also wasn't winning many 1v1's early on either, most goals came from leading up or snaps.
View attachment 2338770
I'm happy to still say he's far more developed than caddy
View attachment 2338805
Has that v shape and huge broad shoulders a power athlete has, Also he only played a game or two before glandular and injures ruined season one, came back and pulled down ten marks in one of his first games back, came 4th rising star second year, then the knees started playing up. I'd say he was winning enough one on ones but he didn't play enough in those early years to judge v caddy who's playing every game
Firstly Curnow's setback in terms of injury was like in his 5th year. Irrelevant.
Secondly he looks nothing in that pic like he looks now. Stark difference. That's already the first thing you were wrong on.
Also, in terms of muscle mass, which is what creates the point of difference in terms of strength/body on body (not frame, any lanklet can have a frame as a base but means nothing in this context) he and Nate started off similar. So no, you were wrong.
If you watch Curnow's early highlights you'll note most of the goals kicked were snaps, on the run, or i50 marks he managed on creating space. The 1v1's didn't come until he managed to put on some mass later in his career. It would've been too soon to call for Charlie early just as it is for Caddy now, who by the way, leads Curnow on goals as per first games played.
Curnow in Sep 2017, 27 games in:
View attachment 2338906
Curnow in 2023:
View attachment 2338908
If you can't see a clear difference then I don't know what to tell you mate. Muscle mass makes a huge difference.
In fairness he's an expert, he frequently is wrong.I don't exactly know how it came to an argument over whether Charlie looks different as a 26 year old with 6 years in the gym than he did as an 18 year old but here we are...
I claimed he was never your toothpick style draftee, he had a rather hulking frame which I maintain the photos show which held him in good stead as a rookie- a shape which caddy dosent have because I think they are , and will become totally different types of players. Caddy dosent look to have the same shoulders and width that builds into a Charlie or Jed Walter type. Hence Nate needing an Archer May to play off
Some guys just stay a different shape, like a Jack Riewoldt, a Jack Gunston ect. So unless you've got a time machine , there's no claiming wrong on an opinion that won't manifest for years.
Firstly Curnow's setback in terms of injury was like in his 5th year. Irrelevant.
Secondly he looks nothing in that pic like he looks now. Stark difference. That's already the first thing you were wrong on.
Also, in terms of muscle mass, which is what creates the point of difference in terms of strength/body on body (not frame, any lanklet can have a frame as a base but means nothing in this context) he and Nate started off similar. So no, you were wrong.
If you watch Curnow's early highlights you'll note most of the goals kicked were snaps, on the run, or i50 marks he managed on creating space. The 1v1's didn't come until he managed to put on some mass later in his career. It would've been too soon to call for Charlie early just as it is for Caddy now, who by the way, leads Curnow on goals as per first games played.
christ almighty he has masturbated a lot in six yearsCurnow in Sep 2017, 27 games in:
View attachment 2338906
Curnow in 2023:
View attachment 2338908
If you can't see a clear difference then I don't know what to tell you mate. Muscle mass makes a huge difference.
I would love to see that. I don't think Brad would even consider it, though.I know Brad doesn’t really operate this way, but I’d love him to bring in May or McMahon and play Caddy on Cameron. Just a pure development game. Even if it’s just for a quarter or two. Learn the patterns.