Beerfish
Unscripted Hot Takes
- Jan 20, 2008
- 64,548
- 110,091
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Nic Martin
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Pretty sure he was a bulldogs supporterI don't think he actually went for Essendon!
Karl Langdon.for some reason I thought of that blonde West Coast player..... what was his name...... Karl Langford?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Interesting the training report over on BB.
Harves had a nice chat to a few of them watching told them to keep an eye out for Langford.
http://www.bomberblitz.com/discussion/discussion/2303/training-friday-16-1-15#latest
Langford has flown under the radar a bit. Was speaking to a bloke who supposedly watches a lot of Knights games and he reckons Langford has a similar abilty in traffic as Pendles/Heppell/Bontempelli.
Everyone's the next judd arent they
Ill back you in JackLangford and Bontempelli is an easy and very appropriate comparison though, you'd only have to see him once to get it. Similar heights, very similar body shapes, long limbs and they both cover the turf so effortlessly because of the long legs
Blokes still likened to a Chris Judd but I've noticed the players that the draftees are likened to today are often Pendlebury, Enright, Selwood, Bartel, Fyfe, and Sam Mitchell. There would be others but so many times I've heard "He's got a bit of Pendlebury in him" or "the way he plays reminds me of a Corey Enright".Everyone's the next judd arent they
Blokes still likened to a Chris Judd but I've noticed the players that the draftees are likened to today are often Pendlebury, Enright, Selwood, Bartel, Fyfe, and Sam Mitchell. There would be others but so many times I've heard "He's got a bit of Pendlebury in him" or "the way he plays reminds me of a Corey Enright".
The same names for comparison keep bobbing up.
Heard Bartel the least out of that group. The rest definitely.Blokes still likened to a Chris Judd but I've noticed the players that the draftees are likened to today are often Pendlebury, Enright, Selwood, Bartel, Fyfe, and Sam Mitchell. There would be others but so many times I've heard "He's got a bit of Pendlebury in him" or "the way he plays reminds me of a Corey Enright".
The same names for comparison keep bobbing up.
Heard Bartel the least out of that group. The rest definitely.
Everyone's the next judd arent they
I reckon he'll be better than Laverde FWIW. As for first season impact I can see him pushing Ambrose out of our best 22 due to his marking ability, tackling, kicking, pace and versatility.Langford needs more hype. Got the feeling he's going to be a star and have a surprising amount of impact in his first season.
I reckon he'll be better than Laverde FWIW. As for first season impact I can see him pushing Ambrose out of our best 22 due to his marking ability, tackling, kicking, pace and versatility.
Would you have him a better chance than Laverde? I always saw Laverde as a better chance.Don't be surprised if you see this kid play Round 1.
Cal has said so (for R1 anyway) in another tweet. Has completed more of PS than Laverde.Would you have him a better chance than Laverde? I always saw Laverde as a better chance.
Um, we were chasing Gunston, just Hawthorn got in earlier.Will he make up for the mistake of not getting Gunston "because we already have enough KPPs"?
With him and Ambrose working together it'll be a half forward line that can cover a fair bit of territory!!
Would you have him a better chance than Laverde? I always saw Laverde as a better chance.