Remove this Banner Ad

5 On the Bench + Other Changes Introduced for 2026

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So far, the two changes are 5 on the bench no sub, the bounce down is scrapped. There could be some other changes to come, or not.

Personally, i love the “no bounce down” but others may not.

I think most will agree that 5 on the bench is better than 4 and a sub.
I hated the sub and regularly mentioned i did not care who the sub was during the season

Will it stay at 5 as we have seen changes to the sub rule before. I think it will.

Each club is in a different stage of development and will use the extra player differently.

I see debuting players and other players with just a few AFL games playing via the bench being a good move for a lot of clubs.

Maybe some will try to run two rucks without having that forward ruck position player.

Easing good players back with limited game time rather than via the VFL may be considered

Sheedy often said you can't have enough midfielders in your team. A lot of clubs may go that way. If not pure midfield likely a forward/wing/mid versatile player

Who the opposition is could also come into consideration

I don’t necessarily see that 5th player as being just the next best 23 player in line.

In my opinion the bench selection will change as the season progresses. Coaches will learn and adjust with each game

Our GF team below as a reference point as it's not a best 23 thread. Proven or new/injured best 23 AFL players to the side in brackets. For now, i did not include Coleman, Doedee or McCarthy as they have a lot to prove in the preseason. All used to be best 23 though. Also, a few Drafts to come but i included Annable

B: D.Zorko, D.Gardiner, R.Lester (Payne inj)

HB: D.Wilmot, H.Andrews (c), J Fletcher (Answerth inj)

C: S.Marshall, H.McCluggage, L.Ashcroft (Berry inj,)

HF: C.Cameron, L.Morris, T.Gallop, (Allen inj, Hipwood inj)

F: Z Bailey, C.Rayner, K Lohman (McKenna,)

FOLL: D.Fort, J.Dunkley, W.Ashcroft (Draper inj)

I/C: B. Reville, C Ah-Chee, B Starcevich, O.McInerney , L Neale (c) sub.
.............................................................................

The remaining players below. Looking at these players we are short on midfielders and small forwards

Defense: Coleman inj, Doedee, Brain, Beecken, Lloyd, Zakostelsky, Joyce

Midfield/Ruck: Smith, Tunstill, Annable, Torrent

Forward: McCarthy inj, McLachlan

EDIT 1 29/10/25 7 rule changes now approved for season 2026

GOALSQUARE STARTING POSITION

While the 6-6-6 rule will remain from centre ball-ups, there will no longer be a requirement for at least one player per team to start in the goalsquare. This will be a measure to help reduce dead time after goals.

Last season, the AFL's findings discovered that the goalsquare was the last remaining facet of 6-6-6 to be organised at 10 per cent of all post-goal restarts. On average, that delayed the game by 8-10 seconds per instance. The League subsequently expects the total time saved through this rule change will be around 20-30 seconds per match.

LAST DISPOSAL

A free kick will now be awarded when the ball crosses the line from a disposal between the arcs, bringing the men's game in line with the AFLW's 'lasso' rule.

It will operate similar to SANFL in the sense that if a player blocks an opponent or doesn't play the ball before it crosses the line, a normal boundary throw-in will occur instead of a last disposal free kick.

In the 2025 season, the AFL's findings discovered that there were 20 boundary throw-ins paid between the arcs and 0.5 insufficient intent free kicks paid between the arcs per game. The League then adapted those numbers for a scenario where the last disposal rule had been introduced. Its adapted numbers showed boundary throw-ins would be reduced by three per game, while 0.3 current insufficient intent free kicks would be negated by a last disposal free kick.
The adapted numbers also showed that there would have been an average of 3.25 last disposal free kicks per game paid across the 2025 season.

The query from club land has been whether a last disposal rule would kill the ruck. However, there still would have been 67 stoppages per game on average in 2025 based on the adapted numbers. That would have brought it back in line with the AFL's 2023 and 2024 averages.

CENTRE BALL-UP CONTESTS

At all centre ball-ups, competing rucks will now be unable to cross the centre line before engaging with their opposition ruck. This is born from a desire to see the jumping rucks return to the game.

The AFL has said this rule would not have been possible without the end of the 'centre bounce', as opposed to the 'centre ball-up', due to the variables of which direction the ball can go from a bounce. The ball-up also gives the umpire extra time and ability to assess where the ruck is stationed when he engages his opponent.

The AFL's findings discovered that only 21 per cent of centre bounce ruck contests had at least one ruck jumping in the 2025 season. In 2023, just two years ago, that number was at 63 per cent.

There will still be an opportunity for the more physical wrestling rucks to impact the game at around-the-ground stoppages and boundary throw-ins.

ALIGN KICK-IN TIME

Umpires currently allow 'reasonable time' for a kick-in, which is deemed at around 12 seconds. However, 'reasonable time' for a mark or free kick paid around the ground is deemed at eight seconds. From 2026 onwards, both of these will align to be eight seconds.

The AFL sampled more than 1200 kick-ins across the 2025 season, with a quarter of those lasting longer than 10 seconds and 13 per cent lasting longer than 12 seconds.

There was an average of 21 kick-ins taken per game across the 2025 season. If a quarter of those are reduced by four or five seconds, the League is conservatively hoping that around 21 seconds of match length is knocked off through kick-ins alone.

RUCK NOMINATIONS

Umpires can now restart play without a nominated ruck being present, bringing the men's game in line with AFLW rules. If there is no nomination, or the nominated ruck is too far away, the play will be restarted immediately.

The 'third-man up' is still outlawed, so if no rucks nominate – or if the two nominated rucks are too far away when play is restarted – the ball will be thrown up and will have to hit the ground before 'play on' is called.

The AFL discovered that there were on average four ball-ups and six boundary throw-ins per game last season with a delay due to the umpire waiting for nominated rucks to arrive at a contest before restarting the play. It contributed to an average of three and a half seconds worth of delay on ball-ups and around one second worth of delay on boundary throw-ins.

One particular example from St Kilda's victory over Melbourne late in the year saw two rucks nominate for a boundary throw-in on the opposite wing, despite only just returning to the field of play from the bench. The umpire waited more than 25 seconds for the two rucks to arrive at the contest, before restarting the play.

SHRUGGING IN THE TACKLE

A shrug in a tackle will now be deemed prior opportunity. It will be similar to how a fend, or an attempt to evade a tackle is deemed prior opportunity.

It's hoped this will stop players from contributing to a high tackle, while making the rule easier to adjudicate for umpires.

STAND

There will be a stronger enforcement of players being told to 'stand' if they are inside the protected area.

Now, if you are within 5m of a mark or a free kick when it is paid, deemed the protected area, you will be required to 'stand' and can no longer reverse to being 'outside five'.

The AFL found that more and more players have left the protected area to stand 'outside five' across the last season. In 2025 alone, the AFL's findings discovered that only 58 per cent of opposition players would 'stand' when told while 18 per cent of players went to the area deemed 'outside five' by the umpire.

It's hoped this will see more players take the game on, encourage overlapping possessions and more free-flowing ball movement.
 
Last edited:
So the last game with a Sub on the bench was the 2025 GF and involved Geelong and Scott completely mismanaging it and the Lions and Fages nailing it with the best sub rotation ever...love it!

Close second is Zorko circa 2012
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Wonder if anyone will do the equivalent of sitting Lachie on the end of the five person bench for three quarters and then injecting them fresh into the fray in the fourth?
Short answer. i don't see that option being used at all.

Neale recovery was unique and having him declared ready to play and also having that option in the last game of the season was a very rare occurrence. A future trivia question for sure.

I have not taken any notice of opposition starting bench players over the years
Hard enough to remember to see (i sit above the bench for home games) or look up who our guys are on the bench
Noticed the two Ashcrofts are regularly starting from the bench.
There is always one defender (not KPD) sometimes a KPF but mostly the mid/forward guys making up the rest.
 
Short answer. i don't see that option being used at all.

Neale recovery was unique and having him declared ready to play and also having that option in the last game of the season was a very rare occurrence. A future trivia question for sure.

I have not taken any notice of opposition starting bench players over the years
Hard enough to remember to see (i sit above the bench for home games) or look up who our guys are on the bench
Noticed the two Ashcrofts are regularly starting from the bench.
There is always one defender (not KPD) sometimes a KPF but mostly the mid/forward guys making up the rest.
I suppose keeping the Lachie as a tactical injection in Q4 while both teams are playing with 22 players is different from playing our 22 to their 23 players for Q1-3 as well... if you are good enough to be ok playing one player down for three quarters do you actually need the final quarter injection...
 
Wonder if anyone will do the equivalent of sitting Lachie on the end of the five person bench for three quarters and then injecting them fresh into the fray in the fourth?
I think this might be part of tactics to consider for coaching panel. Holding back a senior player who can change the game in second half might be an idea to explore for different teams - Collingwood might do it with Pendlebury or Sidebottom etc.

If someone gets injured then the 5th player comes on early - if not they could introduce the 5th player in the 3rd quarter or something. Various tactics to explore next year.
 
I think initially players TOG for the Lions will be spread around similar to what happens now.
Inexperience draft players getting lower TOG unless they are in the Ashcroft/Daicos category
If teams go with 2 specialist rucks, then the 2nd ruck will get less TOG. That could easily be us in R1.

Below Lions players TOG stats from footywire
.....................................................................
The bottom six were the most sub affected

Marshall 6 subs on/off of 11 games
McLachlan 4 of 6
Reville 8 of 13,
Day 2 of 13,
Gallop 2 of 6
Lohmann 5 of 18

2025 Brisbane Time On Ground % Per Game Leaders (Minimum 6 Games Played)
RankNameGamesAverage
1​
27​
95.00​
2​
13​
87.23​
3​
26​
84.92​
4​
27​
84.19​
5​
27​
83.63​
6​
21​
83.10​
7​
26​
83.04​
8​
27​
82.37​
9​
22​
82.36​
10​
27​
82.19​
11​
27​
82.15​
12​
27​
82.04​
13​
27​
81.96​
14​
17​
81.71​
15​
25​
81.20​
16​
26​
80.46​
17​
22​
80.41​
18​
26​
79.27​
19​
18​
76.00​
20​
27​
75.63​
21​
14​
75.07​
22​
14​
74.36​
23​
24​
73.42​
24​
18​
70.22​
25​
6​
68.83​
26​
13​
67.08​
27​
13​
51.85​
28​
6​
50.33​
29​
11​
50.09​
 
Most really don't make a difference to much to be honest.

The last disposal is the big one but it's undergone so much testing in AFLW and SANFL that it will be pretty straightforward.

No crossing the centre line at throw ups is ok given guys like Grundy and Briggs just reduce any point of interest in the contest.

Time tweaks... meh. The stand rule will limit confusion I guess but minimally.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

No crossing the centre line at throw ups is ok given guys like Grundy and Briggs just reduce any point of interest in the contest.
Might help to bring back the jumping at centre bounces?
So someone like Tom DeKoning or maybe even Draper who I believe likes to jump, could benefit.
 
Shrugging being deemed prior might be interesting for the Joel Selwood disciples out there...

It was already meant to be play on and was still drawing free kicks:

UMPIRES have been instructed not to pay free kicks to players who they believe are responsible for drawing high contact from tacklers.

The AFL's head of umpiring, Dan Richardson, said the rules would not reward players for "putting themselves in vulnerable positions to draw a free kick".

"This is something we prefer not to see in our game at any level," he said.

After a spate of recent high-contact free kicks sparked widespread debate, the AFL wrote to clubs on Tuesday to clarify how high tackles should be adjudicated.

If the ball carrier has no prior opportunity to dispose and is responsible for creating the high contact through a shrug, drop or arm lift, play on should be called.


I don't know that this is going to change much. Before it was a gamble between a free kick to you and play on, which is potentially a free kick against you for HTB. Now it's roughly the same.
 
The AFL's research found that the ball was 'in play' for only 62.9 per cent of games last season, down from 65.4 per cent in 2019. It also found that match length had increased almost five minutes across the last six seasons.

Both numbers are a disgrace and a reflection of an administration who fell asleep at the wheel.

Australian Football's great selling point relative to the rugby codes used to be it's non-stop, free-flowing nature. Can't claim that any more.
 
Both numbers are a disgrace and a reflection of an administration who fell asleep at the wheel.

Australian Football's great selling point relative to the rugby codes used to be it's non-stop, free-flowing nature. Can't claim that any more.

Interesting that tv advertising break lengths increased by a few seconds around Covid.

No correlation, nothing to see here though!!!
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The stand rule change is a bit stupid imo.

I imagine they are annoyed at Collingwood rorting it but to me the problem there as them going back 5 directly through where the player with the ball wanted to kick to open up play. Could have been cracked down on within existing rules.

Think this just creates a mess for umpiring regardless when there are multiple defensive players in the area of a mark and the umps have to work out who to make stand.
 
Think this just creates a mess for umpiring regardless when there are multiple defensive players in the area of a mark and the umps have to work out who to make stand.
Clearly it should be everyone, as that would be the most hilarious outcome
 
The shrug one is the one that will create more grey and confusion… not a fan. Should just be up to umpire discretion, not written as a rule.

One of the video examples the AFL used was Levi getting his head absolutely taken off by IQ in the prelim against the pies. Despite him lifting the arm, the tackle was already around his neck.

Video can be seen in the shrugging example on this link

 
The stand rule change is a bit stupid imo.

I imagine they are annoyed at Collingwood rorting it but to me the problem there as them going back 5 directly through where the player with the ball wanted to kick to open up play. Could have been cracked down on within existing rules.

Think this just creates a mess for umpiring regardless when there are multiple defensive players in the area of a mark and the umps have to work out who to make stand.
I like this one. If there's any player in the protected zone, they're told to stand then that is the mark. If there's multiple players in the protected zone choose one at random to stand the mark and the others have to clear the zone. If a player is told to stand and he moves after he's been told to stand, then it's 50.

The 6-6-6 rule change makes me laugh:

GOALSQUARE STARTING POSITION

While the 6-6-6 rule will remain from centre ball-ups, there will no longer be a requirement for at least one player per team to start in the goalsquare. This will be a measure to help reduce dead time after goals.

Last season, the AFL's findings discovered that the goalsquare was the last remaining facet of 6-6-6 to be organised at 10 per cent of all post-goal restarts. On average, that delayed the game by 8-10 seconds per instance. The League subsequently expects the total time saved through this rule change will be around 20-30 seconds per match.

The rule change makes sense, but seriously 20-30 seconds per match time saved? How about shaving a few seconds off the add break between goals and get the centre throw up happening quicker...
 

Remove this Banner Ad

5 On the Bench + Other Changes Introduced for 2026

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top