Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

James Kelly looks like he's going to have a good year, nice price atm too.
James Kelly looks like he's going to have a good year, nice price atm too.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Not worth it. Very sideways trade and your probably switching to a player who will score less. Let your cash cows make the money and let your players on the field score the points
Even though I have to agree, I saw Hansen on the wing thought he would get a few possessions, was gonna get Harry Taylor but dunno why I didnt. Even though back to my point, I do agree but you have added no valuble opinion whatsoever about the rest of about what I said so I'd appreciate you say something useful, I already am annoyed Hansen didn't play, dont have to highlight the negativity. What did you score this week/last week mr pro dream team.
Agree with that. McIntosh will most likely have the second best average for a ruckman at the end of the year. Why would you trade that out?
The question is, should you fix a mistake that will only cost 1 trade and make 120k in the process or leave it as is and use the trade elsewhere. Very tough one.
is hurn for thornton a good trade?
Has anyone watched a Collingwood game this year?
Josh Fraser has frustrated me, especially when the other person i was weighing him up against is doing so well (Symmonds). Getting 20 less points per round with an extra $112,000 price tag is making me consider a trade. I probably wont but has Fraser had little TOG or something?
Has anyone watched a Collingwood game this year?
Josh Fraser has frustrated me, especially when the other person i was weighing him up against is doing so well (Symmonds). Getting 20 less points per round with an extra $112,000 price tag is making me consider a trade. I probably wont but has Fraser had little TOG or something?
ah, i am pretty set on this weeks trades
Dew - Gamble
Lucas- Pav/BJ, plus 30,000
Now i just gotta choose between pav, and bj
pav will have a slow game on glass this week, and whoever i dont get now, will get through upgrading
if i was you i would go for Hill imstead of Gamble if you dont already have him. IMO i would choose Pavlich hes consistant and is looking at playing in the middle than pushing forward. Pav will always score an avg of 95+ where BJ could run out of legs come later rounds
Agree with that assessment BB, looks like a major mistake on my part to overlook Simmonds this year. Honestly thought it'd take him a while to get back into it. Don't compare Round 1 stats though, McIntosh only played half the game. Both are good acquisitions, however you look at it.Why does everyone keep saying that?!? Has everybody missed the fact that Simmonds, a proven DTer, has outscored him in the first 2 rounds? He even outscored him today, when McIntosh would have been in the votes.
Big Mac = Simmo +or- 5 points.
I would have thought you'd knew all about duds supporting Richmond. Clearly not.Hes a dud. Thats probably why hes not scoring as well. Always gets a knock of some kind. Currently Collingwood are trying to find him a new position because they finally realised that Wood is a way better ruckman than him. Will probably move forward.
ah, i am pretty set on this weeks trades
Dew - Gamble
Lucas- Pav/BJ, plus 30,000
Now i just gotta choose between pav, and bj
pav will have a slow game on glass this week, and whoever i dont get now, will get through upgrading
It is if there is a player who will average almost the same and will cost 220k. The only real answer is that Simmonds should have been in from the start, but it is a bit late now to change that. It is not too late to fix it. One thing is for sure, if anyone is contemplating the Hamish-Simmo trade it is now or never. Not one you can wait a week or two on, and whatever decision you make by lockout this week is one made for the entire year.I'd rather use my trades on duds that average less than 60 and cost 250K+, or on injuries. A player that will average at least 85 and only costs 350K is far from a mistake.