Blackas87
Brownlow Medallist
The only problem with Etihad is you get stuck sitting on the top level while the best seats on level 2 are always empty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also, I've never understood people's complaints about Etihad's location, either. I mean, it couldn't get much more central and convenient, could it?
What suburb do you live in, chump?But it's Perth. If rather blow my ******* head off than live in that shithole
Seriously I hope it's great and I hope you love it...and I hope it's big enough to occasionally get over and remind myself why I hate the place.
Waverley Park lasted 30 years, so to be fair Etihad is halfway through the Victorian stadium that isn't the MCG life cycle.
The Waverley Park design was terrible, the seats were so far away from the field, if you were sitting yp the back you'd need a telescope to see who had the ball.
Etihad is apparently terrible, too.
Apart from the location, viewing experience, modern facilities and coverage from the elements... what have the Romans ever done for us?
Pleasant tree lined walk ways either side of the stadium with multiple entrances to the train station/tram routes, plus access to some food/drink/entertainment venues around the stadium and there wouldn't have been a need for any car park besides spots for players/employees/disabled/corporate tickets. So the car park could've been under the stands and the oval could've drained naturally instead of sitting on a concrete floor.Next time don't build a carpark underneath. Build it on top, you silly gooses.
I actually don't mind Docklands, it's damn easy to get too and the seats aren't too bad. Plus you can very easily go to the city afterwards for a meal or a drink.
It's actually in an ideal location
Most hatred directed towards Etihad is just groupthink.
The real reason most people like the MCG is because with 100,000 seats they can get something for nothing - i.e. buy a cheap ticket and get a good seat.
Etihad is apparently terrible, too.
Apart from the location, viewing experience, modern facilities and coverage from the elements... what have the Romans ever done for us?
Yeah I think the Government is a lot smarter than Collingwood, they won't listen to Eddie - the last time anyone listened to Eddie (Collingwood) in 09 well I think the results speak for themselvesIs Eddie's thing actually a thing? Help a west aussie out here..
The league hopes the Etihad overhaul will kill off a rival plan from Collingwood president Eddie McGuire to build a $1 billion new stadium near the MCG."
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/vi...d/news-story/58b7f7cd8edc60515bed660222014280
I don't get this bit. Why does Eddie's plan need to be trumped with an alternative stadium proposal? Why can't Eddie just be told to GAGF because he's dreaming? Sure he'll sulk a little, but what's he gunna do? Are people so afraid of Eddie that have to take him seriously?
Putting footy aside, Etihad has been on the nose for some time because it's a large part of the problem that is the Docklands, which is probably the greatest planning cockup in Melbourne's history. The City of Melbourne hate how the Docklands has turned out, so do the developers building on the Docks, so do the businesses unfortunate enough to be down there, so do the apartment owners. It's a disaster.
There is a widespread belief that the whole area needs rebuilding and that includes the stadium. So when anybody - incl Eddie - comes up with a "plan" to get the stadium out of there, it's going to generate some interest and support.
The AFL don't want to move, they want the Docks fixed whilst retaining the stadium. So here's their idea.
It Eddie using this to blackmail the MCC to get a better deal for his clubIs Eddie's thing actually a thing? Help a west aussie out here..
You can't really fix that because big stadiums by their very nature are barren when there is no event on. Doesn't matter what you do stadiums they will always appear this way. One relatively cheap way to improve it would be to just get some paint colour on the buildings even the stadium itself because its just so boring, look at the new Perth stadium there will be next to no grey, white or black exterior panels. Also maybe get rid of the concrete floor and add coloured paving. Maybe some colourful sculptures as well. No need to spend 300 million though.The immediate surrounds do need significant improvement as it is fairly barren at the moment. The proposed 300 million development would only improve it and yes provide a more pleasing link between the CBD and the Docklands.
I don't think that 'most' Victorians hate it. It really is a great facility with everything conveniently placed. Probably its only significant Achilles Heal is its very expensive running costs. I would hate to be paying their electricity bill. They have to run infrared lights around the clock between games to promote grass growth and regeneration, not to mention the massive power consumption that goes with playing with a closed roof, which is practically every game (with few exceptions). The immediate surrounds do need significant improvement as it is fairly barren at the moment. The proposed 300 million development would only improve it and yes provide a more pleasing link between the CBD and the Docklands.
Can't you just pay extra to sit in them?The only problem with Etihad is you get stuck sitting on the top level while the best seats on level 2 are always empty.
Not 100% sure on all the seats but the Medalian club takes a fair chunk of the seats on level 2 up and not too many of their members turn up unless it's a big game.Can't you just pay extra to sit in them?