Doctor Feel
Shitposter In Chief
- Thread starter
- #226
FORTBALL
It's played between two forts. Winner claims the opposition's fort.
It's played between two forts. Winner claims the opposition's fort.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Remind me why that's interesting?We'll make history by playing in the first ever AFLX match.
Remind me why that's interesting?
FORTBALL
It's played between two forts. Winner claims the opposition's fort.
Already has me more keen than AFLX
Sent from mTalk
If AFLX is a huge success, what then? What's the end point here?
Multi-million dollar player auctions on the sub-continent draining the talent pool for the traditional version of the game.
As the club said, it IS training, it is very much like the small sided games played in training. Those worried about injuries are not being fair.I don't know why we would be wasting even a second training this. Send the young boys out and have a bit of fun with it but don't go any further than that.
FORTBALL
It's played between two forts. Winner claims the opposition's fort.
Disagree.Those worried about injuries are not being fair.
How is that any different to doing it in training?Disagree.
What if Dixon runs out there and does an ACL.
There goes our whole AFL season on the back of a mickey mouse demonstration sport.
Because training has to be done. This game doesn't. It serves zero purpose, there is nothing on the end of it. The training is for and has an AFL flag on the end of it. There is thus a purpose, a goal and the ultimate achievement linked to the training. This game has none of that.How is that any different to doing it in training?
The only way it is different is if an opposition player injures somebody intentionally.
They'll just miss that training session and play instead. A game against different opposition is better training most of the time, especially for those with little exposure to AFL.Because training has to be done. This game doesn't. It serves zero purpose, there is nothing on the end of it. The training is for and has an AFL flag on the end of it.
If games against opposition were the best way to train, best way to develop skills, manage players and ensure the least amount of injuries, etc, then we would do it. The Power boys would play the Magpies, or have scratch matches against other clubs regularly. We don't because it isn't. We have 2 trial games for that and can establish more if we need them. The rest of our training is about management, time, miles, skills all for the goal of an AFL premiership.They'll just miss that training session and play instead. A game against different opposition is better training most of the time, especially for those with little exposure to AFL.
It isn't wrong, the fact we ARE doing it negates your point.If games against opposition were the best way to train, best way to develop skills, manage players and ensure the least amount of injuries, etc, then we would do it. The Power boys would play the Magpies, or have scratch matches against other clubs regularly. We don't because it isn't. We have 2 trial games for that and can establish more if we need them. The rest of our training is about management, time, miles, skills all for the goal of an AFL premiership.
So again the statement you made is wrong. It is completely FAIR to consider the risk of injuries in this AFLX as a huge concern. This AFLX Sport should be left to the non-professionals to play and grow.