- Banned
- #1,951
(Because he loves them.)
Because he is fraudulent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Soccer Notice Image
FA Cup Semi-Finals ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ Europa - Rd of 16 ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - KNOCKOUTS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ Champs League - League Phase ⚽
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 5
SuperCoach Rd 5 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 5 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
(Because he loves them.)
None of them deserved a game. Could have made a case for EVW but we had enough 3rd defender types playing anyway
We've been too conservative with young players. Has to end.
We've been too conservative with young players. Has to end.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It's already continuing, Simpkin sitting out main sessions etc.
We have no idea.
Are we being too conservative or is he genuine not right yet? He's 8 months off a broken leg.
It's already continuing, Simpkin sitting out main sessions etc.
We have no idea.
He's about 2 weeks off full training.
I'd expect us to be cautious with him. He's a potential jet.
We've been too conservative with young players. Has to end.
I agree to a certain extent. Mountford and EVW deserved opportunities last year.
It would help however if we drafted kids who weren't twigs needing two years in the gym before they are capable of competing.
you have no idea. there is a thing called apprenticeship, the building up of skills through watching and learning off more experienced types. clearly BS plays players when they're ready - when they can compete strength wise, and run out a game - but there also has to be a spot for them. From music to footy to anthropology - every profession expects younger novices to be mentored as they learn the tricks of the trade.It's already continuing, Simpkin sitting out main sessions etc.
We have no idea.
I agree to a certain extent. Mountford and EVW deserved opportunities last year.
It would help however if we drafted kids who weren't twigs needing two years in the gym before they are capable of competing.
dal santo, Swallow, Anderson and Spud.In whose place?
EVW for Spud? Comicdal santo, Swallow, Anderson and Spud.
Swallow shouldn't be in the team. Dumont is better than him. Dal Santo was average all year. Spud was shithouse in the second half of the year. Mountford and Clarke could have played the same position as Anderson. Majak should have played instead of Dish for half the season.EVW for Spud? Comic
Mountford for Swallow or Dal Santo? Swallow the captain, no chance.
Dal Santo? Perhaps, I wanted someone to push him out by the end of the year.
Anderson plays a different position
In whose place?
None of them deserved a game. Could have made a case for EVW but we had enough 3rd defender types playing anyway
yeah, na. Since the beginning of time the music industry has been more than happy to throw young novices into the limelight. And don't get me started on Anthropoligists....those guys live in the dark ages.you have no idea. there is a thing called apprenticeship, the building up of skills through watching and learning off more experienced types. clearly BS plays players when they're ready - when they can compete strength wise, and run out a game - but there also has to be a spot for them. From music to footy to anthropology - every profession expects younger novices to be mentored as they learn the tricks of the trade.
Are we being too conservative or is he genuine not right yet? He's 8 months off a broken leg.
I tend to agree, the young first rounders at GWS had no choice but to get playing exposure because they had a whole team of them. Fast forward 4 years on and they have studs all over the park, so I can see your point regarding giving exposure to midfield guys like Simpkin & Clarke.Look we are probably doing the right thing but I'd rather we use the sink or swim mentality that other teams choose to go with. Our players get to year 3 and rarely have they debuted which IMO reinforces the negative rhetoric we have to endure re: our team.
A player such as Simpkin is already more skilful than 99% of the senior team, what the **** is he going to learn at Avalon?
Throw him in the deep end and watch him swim his way out of trouble.
I tend to agree, the young first rounders at GWS had no choice but to get playing exposure because they had a whole team of them. Fast forward 4 years on and they have studs all over the park, so I can see your point regarding giving exposure to midfield guys like Simpkin & Clarke.
However, I can understand the rationale behind giving the bigger guys like Durdin and McKay more time to develop because they were built like Ethiopian marathon runners coupled with injury concerns. Playing a physically underdeveloped big man against guys like Tomahaw and Rance will not end well.
Clarke moves like a pre-gear'd Ben Cousins and will be a jet, add Simpkin, Ahern and in a couple of years time we will be 'delicious'..
I'm hearing that Scotts is trying to sell a rebuild to the board but the board ain't buying it. Wouldn't be suprised that Scotts is regretting moving on some of the senior type. Wouldn't be suprised that he plays his most experienced line up in an attempt to remain competitive. Otherwise if we don't perform Scotts contract could very well be terminated a bit over a year to go. :stern look