- Joined
- Oct 4, 2015
- Posts
- 17,106
- Reaction score
- 34,039
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Rubbish
Do you know something that barass70 doesn't?
Please share your insight.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Rubbish
Disease is a bit harsh. Seems a bit arrogant and his team mates get into him a bit, but disease...Good on them... the kid is a plodder and a disease.
Gibbs can stay and help our young mids develop.
If North move him on and the Draft is shallow and we don't have many picks, I think Majak is worth a try.I saw someone mention Majak Daw possibly coming to Carlton, any truth in this?
Maybe he'll be a Majak Daw to future success at Carlton.If North move him on and the Draft is shallow and we don't have many picks, I think Majak is worth a try.
Didn't work with Gorringe, maybe we get the best out of Majak.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Daw's been a rollercoaster for North, but he has incredible raw ability......If North move him on and the Draft is shallow and we don't have many picks, I think Majak is worth a try.
Didn't work with Gorringe, maybe we get the best out of Majak.
Statistically no, but they've both had limited exposure. McGovern is a quicker, taller, more agile and whips the ball with his kicking. Both play a very aggressive style trying to move the ball forward, but ultimately I would say McGovern is the more dangerous player.
You've also conveniently left out that McGovern gets considerably more scoring assists and marks inside 50 than Sicily.
Yes.....if only to stop him getting 35 possessions against us like he usually does.......him or Robbo are usually best on ground against Carlton............If you were SOS, would you chase Rocky?
Majak? Forget it.
Her's a one in every 6 week player. Not the type we need.
Hasn't learned his way around the ground and never will.
Someone would likely pay for Daw, thinking they could teach him something he hasn't been able to learn yet.
I just can't see it being us. Our ruck stocks will have to be bolstered by the right types, and Daw just doesn't fit......even on the cheap.
5 clubs lining up for Trent Mckenzie. Why aren't we one of them? 'The Canon' would be a good replacement for Simmo down the the track.
On SM-N920I using BigFooty.com mobile app
Daw is contracted for another 2 years after this. How he was given a 3 year deal I'll never know. He's just not up to AFL standard. We need AFL standard players.
That's more like itGood news .
Goldy and Daw both contracted .
Attack Pruess !!
I agree what people fail to realise when considering players such as Daw is that no club has 40 superstars on their list although GWS may disagree its not just about building quality but also depth in all areas . Dependant on cost he could be quite a valuable addition to a list of 40+ given our side is lacking ruck depth . And our key forward stocks are thin also however im not at all unhappy with what we have coming through there but that may also change somewhat if Casboult leaves .Probably a fair call on Daw .
But our ruck stocks need addressing .
Kruezer lately is getting up every week but has a substantial injury history .
Phillips is again injured and also has history .
Gorringe is gone at seasons end and Korcheck is powerball odds of making it .
So Daw as a rookie or a Palmer type deal (pick 135) ? might not be the worst idea .
Personally i think we should be making a play for Pruess either this year or next .
I know North would probably prefer to keep Pruess and move Goldy on but finding a club to take on Goldy's big contract at his age and diminishing ability/fitness might prove very difficult .
He doesn't really though. He's only just started to this season and only for 2 or 3 games so far, with most of those being 50/50 fwd & back. I think the weekend was the first time he actually played a full game in the backline. Anyway. it wouldn't have made a massive difference on his career stats yet.Considering that Sicily plays in defence as well as attack, that doesn't surprise me.
if I remember correctly Rocky got the 3 votes for bog against us last year...........can play and is tough also.Rockcliff is a seagull, just accumulates loose chips(touches) around the ground.
Gibbs would be main target with rocky a distant second.
I'm not sure where the perception he gets easy ball has come from. He's a gun mid, runs hard and is tough. His disposal is very good too.if I remember correctly Rocky got the 3 votes for bog against us last year...........can play and is tough also.
Not a fan of Sicily, but that is not true. Has been "swinging" for a couple of seasons now, on and off.He doesn't really though. He's only just started to this season and only for 2 or 3 games so far, with most of those being 50/50 fwd & back. I think the weekend was the first time he actually played a full game in the backline. Anyway. it wouldn't have made a massive difference on his career stats yet.
Not a plodder, just ineffectual in a Tom Mitchell kind of way.
Gets plenty of it, doesn't impact games like he should.
I'm not sure where the perception he gets easy ball has come from. He's a gun mid, runs hard and is tough. His disposal is very good too.
No exposure is probably doing him in a bit
Hmm I disagree.Not a fan of Sicily, but that is not true. Has been "swinging" for a couple of seasons now, on and off.