Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Bluemour Discussion thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Some of these are a bit hard to take.

Maybe showing 'a bit' will no longer cut it, will be happy if we can upgrade all of them as it makes the club stronger.

Sick of being beaten in the reserves as well, whole playing list should be under review.
 
That's 2 players remaining from the '12 and '13 drafts, I was thinking we didn't do too bad in those :(
 
well SOS you have put your cajoles on the line. Good for you. But if some of these hacks that you have brought in dont make it - then your job is next. I dont care about your playing career AT ALL. It is irrelevant . You are now in charge of our list and you will be judged accordingly.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

well SOS you have put your cajoles on the line. Good for you. But if some of these hacks that you have brought in dont make it - then your job is next. I dont care about your playing career AT ALL. It is irrelevant . You are now in charge of our list and you will be judged accordingly.

Given the decisions on whose in and out thus far more than happy to keep faith in the process at hand.
 
I must admit some surprise at Holman and Walsh being delisted. I'm a bit confused at the moment which is not unusual for me. This will possibly make sense once the drafts are completed. Is this the final list before the ND?
 
Really disappointed about Holman. I had him in the best 22 next year. I'm worried about who comes in. Brad MacKenzie just re-signed with North so that rumour is out the window.
 
The Holman call is a bit bewildering. Would love to know from insiders what the rationale was behind it.

Warnock one makes me happy though! And to be honest, I'm glad Armfield is still around. Only one guy but the team seems to lack speed without him to pick.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Club said Kerridge is a tagger so he and Curnow probably squeeze Holman out.

Agreed Walsh didn't appear to have much upside.
 
Yes but can Holman rack em up enough to be damaging? I don't know.

The other way to view it is maybe SOS thinks Kerridge, Lamb, Sumner and whatever mids we take in the draft will be better than Holman. It is quite possible when you think of it.

It may well have come down to Holman or Armfield and club might have decided they've got rid of so much experience they need to keep Amry and also he is a big part of the locker room culture.

Holman maybe very stiff.
 
If the club said they only have room for two taggers and Holman is now no.3 behind Kerridge then doesn't that mean we've incrementally improved and that's a good thing?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom