Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread Buckley Contract extension

  • Thread starter Thread starter DrEvil_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Does Nathan deserve a contract extension?


  • Total voters
    271

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Lol stop being a sore loser and wear it on the chin champ.
Havn't been a sore loser at all, Collingwood were the better side and deserved to win. I'm merely responding to comments that are just quite frankly
wrong..

I think you should wear it on the chin champ.. years of Hawthorn domination obviously messing with your head
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Brand counted as he was the replacement fro Frawley who has played most games this year, who was then pulled out sick.

Ceglar is best 22 and has been out since he did his ACL last year, so no shit he hasn't played this year.. we play him and McEvoy together

We didn't drop O'Brien, he was injured with a hip injury? at least get your facts right before you comment.. he is having a breakout year and was a huge loss

Vickery, Duryea and Sicily have been playing at box hill... hence not best 22.

The fact you try to downplay Frawley the man who kept Kennedy goaless in a granny and is having a decent year and is just about our most important player structure wise show's you don't know much about footy..

O'Meara was having a fine promising start to the year before his injury and again gives Mitchell much needed help.. like when we nearly beat Adelaide this year and he dominated in the middle with 37 touches..

Sorry but you quite obviously don't have a great grasp of how football works and claiming O'Brien was dropped when he is having a breakout year and was out injured is a huge LOL
I am not wrong. O'Brien was a late out with a hip injury, that report is wrong and you obviously no nothing about Hawthorn if you think O'Brien was dropped... from the Hawthorn website,
http://www.hawthornfc.com.au/news/2017-05-20/late-change-round-9
"Kaiden Brand (illness) and Tim O’Brien (hip) come out of the 'side, and will be replaced by Kurt Heatherley and James Sicily."

I merely used an example of when Frawley stood up when the going was tough and played a blinder, I see you forgot to mention my point on how important he is to structure, besides you thinking O'Brien was dropped shows you know little about Hawthorn

Can you admit you were wrong and know little about Hawthorn?

Nah not wrong.

Afl says..... omitted.
 
Havn't been a sore loser at all, Collingwood were the better side and deserved to win. I'm merely responding to comments that are just quite frankly
wrong..

I think you should wear it on the chin champ.. years of Hawthorn domination obviously messing with your head


Mate, just let it go. Its ok.
 
Are you joking? Puopolo was also gone for most of the second half and he was actually impacting the game unlike Aish.. we had no forward pressure after he had to stay off

I seriously can't understand the logic of some Pies supporters, that list of Hawks players greatly dwarfs the Pies outs.. Sinclair for gods
sake.. O'Brien is clearly best 22..

Thought you would point what out exactly? your post makes no sense..
Joking about what exactly?

I never said the Hawks outs weren't more significant than the Pies, they obviously were. What I'm saying is the characterization of "Box Hill vs Full strength Collingwood" is an overstatement. That's what I was pointing out. Just because you don't comprehend something doesn't mean that it makes no sense.
 
Joking about what exactly?

I never said the Hawks outs weren't more significant than the Pies, they obviously were. What I'm saying is the characterization of "Box Hill vs Full strength Collingwood" is an overstatement. That's what I was pointing out. Just because you don't comprehend something doesn't mean that it makes no sense.
That is fine to say, the way you explained it and example you used with Aish and questioning if O'Brien was best 22 didn't make sense. But thank you for clarifying that and yes I agree that is an overstatement
 
That is fine to say, the way you explained it and example you used with Aish and questioning if O'Brien was best 22 didn't make sense. But thank you for clarifying that and yes I agree that is an overstatement
Fair enough. Apologies if the point was a little vague. I genuinely wasn't sure if OBrien was best 22, obviously haven't watched enough of the Hawks this year. Hope that O'Meara can get back to his explosive best, that kid was dynamite to watch in his earlier days, would be a loss to the game if he can't recapture that so fingers crossed.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

He makes a really good assistant coach. I actually thought him and Malthouse made a good team until Eddie tore it apart. Could see him fitting well at the saints or Richmond.

Oh for sure, but then I can't hear him in the media!

If he goes back to being an assistant, he could plausibly coach again.
 
Are you joking? Puopolo was also gone for most of the second half and he was actually impacting the game unlike Aish.. we had no forward pressure after he had to stay off

I seriously can't understand the logic of some Pies supporters, that list of Hawks players greatly dwarfs the Pies outs.. Sinclair for gods
sake..
O'Brien is clearly best 22..

Thought you would point what out exactly? your post makes no sense..
I agree with your basic premise that Hawks outs were clearly greater than the Pies. But in the same way you were critical of a Pies poster being wrong about the place of some Hawks players in relation to best 22 you are also wrong here. Sinclair when fit in the last few seasons has been an automatic best 22 player. Not the greatest player but solid and proving something we seriously lack. Pace off HBF with an ability to take the game on and break a line. We are crying out for that and Sinclair is the first one called for that role.
 
I think it gets most interesting if the Pies finish 9th in a burst finish knocking off a few top teams.

No matter how promising it might look for next year, Bucks will have to walk to keep his word, as he held Malty to his word.
 
I think it gets most interesting if the Pies finish 9th in a burst finish knocking off a few top teams.

No matter how promising it might look for next year, Bucks will have to walk to keep his word, as he held Malty to his word.
And well he may. Still I doubt it. If the season finished well and the club believed it was in our best interests for Bucks to remain I think a more considered approach would be taken. Personally I don't see such a finish to the season coming so I suspect Bucks leaving may become pretty cut and dried in the end.

Out of interest what words did Bucks hold MM to?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Collingwood has beaten the bottom team...looks like Bucks is a lock to stay. How long will his new contract be?

On SM-N910G using BigFooty.com mobile app
Don't think you will get many people agreeing with you there. Bucks has to do a lot better to keep his job I would say.
 
I think it gets most interesting if the Pies finish 9th in a burst finish knocking off a few top teams.

No matter how promising it might look for next year, Bucks will have to walk to keep his word, as he held Malty to his word.

I have been since late last year of the view it was time for a change, but what word are you refering to? That he thought the club would sack him if he didn't make finals? Can you point me to where he said he would step away if they didn't make finals.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom