Changes V Sydney

[madcat001]

Milburn is a certainty, probably for Byrnes, and Bomber was also quoted as saying that Chapman will play. Given this, does it mean Prismall will be dropped again after one of his best games? Note he was dropped after his good game against West Coast earlier in the year.

Other possibility is that Harry Taylor will go back to the twos, but with Barry Hall and big Henry, we probably need Harry.

I think the club will be keen to get Chappy back for a couple of games before finals, so someone has to go.

 

[chapmanmagic35]

30 disposals & 3 goals. I know competition for spots is enormous, but srely he'll remain in the side for this week.

 

[Jimmy 2 Shoes]

Prismall will stay in, surely... he has earnt his spot.

Whats the go with Woj? Anyone?

In
Milburn, Chapman

Out
Byrnes, Gamble?

 

[ant0s]

Prismall will stay in, surely... he has earnt his spot.

Whats the go with Woj? Anyone?

In
Milburn, Chapman

Out
Byrnes, Gamble?

Gamble aint going nowhere

 

[re cat]

There will be no Chappy next week and probably no Wojo either.

 

[cats2rise]

Milburn for Byrnes maybe, but if Chapman does come back this week, then Milburn may be in for the very unlucky Taylor?

 

[ant0s]

Id be cut if Taylor is dropped.

Others to go b4 him - (Byrnes obv), Hunt, Gamble, Longerz.

 

[cats2rise]

We would not drop a tall for Milburn or Chapman, Ant0s.

 

[The Casey Cat]

Milburn in for Byrnes. I doubt Chapman will be fit. Very tough finding someone to bring him in for. Hunt would be my preference. I think Gamble and Loners are doing really well up forward.

 

[thegerman]

Milburn is a certainty, probably for Byrnes, and Bomber was also quoted as saying that Chapman will play. Given this, does it mean Prismall will be dropped again after one of his best games? Note he was dropped after his good game against West Coast earlier in the year.

Other possibility is that Harry Taylor will go back to the twos, but with Barry Hall and big Henry, we probably need Harry.

I think the club will be keen to get Chappy back for a couple of games before finals, so someone has to go.

Henry who? Playfair injured his groin about 3 weeks ago and won't be back.

 

[banana_bus]

Id be cut if Taylor is dropped.

Others to go b4 him - (Byrnes obv), Hunt, Gamble, Longerz.

How does this guy keep getting a game?

Having said that, hed probably be leading our B+F if he played for us.

 

[Duskfire]

Sydney has the option of going tall if they wished to, especially if they decide to have Goodes play a more forward role like last night. Dropping taylor now would be pointless.

 

[cat_fanatic]

How does this guy keep getting a game?

Having said that, hed probably be leading our B+F if he played for us.

Damn straight he would!

 

[fugsy]

Milburn in for Hunt, Chapman in for Byrnes if he's available.

Hunt needs a short spell in the two's to get his confidence back IMO.

 

[Glassjaw]

Mickey O and Hank both out still for the Swans? If so, Harry may get stiffed.

 

[crosby123]

I don't understand this "Hunt is crap" theory that seems to be gaining credence. He played on Wonameari (sp?), kept him to seven disposals. What more can you ask? At least, I think he was playing on him. If I'm wrong, feel free to correct.

 

[cats2rise]

How does this guy keep getting a game?

Having said that, hed probably be leading our B+F if he played for us.

Serious? I think he is going to be a pretty good player regardless of who he plays for. Has a massive leap, a good kick, good mark...

 

[cats2rise]

Milburn in for Hunt, Chapman in for Byrnes if he's available.

Hunt needs a short spell in the two's to get his confidence back IMO.

Do you understand how tall our defence would be?

 

[The Casey Cat]

Do you understand how tall our defence would be?

Scarlett is versatile and quick enough to take a smaller player. Harley has been geared towards taking smaller types for years now. Taylor and Milburn are also versatile enough (although preference to keep them on slower types). Mackie and Enright thrive playing on small to mid sized forwards.

Plus all our midfielders and half forwards work hard to push back if given any chance. I don't think it would be an issue. Wasn't last year while Hunt could not get a game.

 

[winty]

Scarlett is versatile and quick enough to take a smaller player. Harley has been geared towards taking smaller types for years now. Taylor and Milburn are also versatile enough (although preference to keep them on slower types). Mackie and Enright thrive playing on small to mid sized forwards.

Plus all our midfielders and half forwards work hard to push back if given any chance. I don't think it would be an issue. Wasn't last year while Hunt could not get a game.

That's because Wojcinski was in the side as well.

 

[cats2rise]

EDIT: Didn't see Winty's post.

 

[The Casey Cat]

That's because Wojcinski was in the side as well.

Fair enough but either way I'd back our defense with or without Hunt to be quick, agile and well organised enough to handle small to medium forwards our opponents can throw at us.

 

[cats2rise]

So who would you play on the Davey/Motlop/Didaks of the competition?

 

[The Casey Cat]

So who would you play on the Davey/Motlop/Didaks of the competition?

Would have to be weighed up each week depending on who else was in our team and theirs. Looking ahead I doubt it will be much of an issue apart from the North game. They have Thomas and Cambpell so Hunt (and or DJ but Josh is ahead of him) would have to play. Apart from that I think Enright can take any quick small.

The way our midfield and forwards are dominating and stifling the delivery it means it is less of an issue.

 

[.Shotties.]

As a long time Cats fan I feel we need to approach this game with the attitude that we have the minor premiership wrapped up and we should start tapering for finals.