Propably. But i still think simmo is hesitant to use gocmv in the ruck.If there is a late change on Sunday it will be a tall (Brown) out, not Jetta.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Propably. But i still think simmo is hesitant to use gocmv in the ruck.If there is a late change on Sunday it will be a tall (Brown) out, not Jetta.
If so there is no point playing Brown over Giles.Propably. But i still think simmo is hesitant to use gocmv in the ruck.
For me. Half Nelson. If he goes well...[emoji14]What will your erection status be if this occurs
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Pretty sure his heart was the same size.When he played for Sydney, what was Jetta like in the "wet"?
Particularly when we didn't even bother to rookie someone like Darcy Cameron to developIf so there is no point playing Brown over Giles.
If what you say about Simmo only wanting to use Giles as a single ruck is true, and the rationale in recruiting Giles was to play him only in the instance that both NN and Lycett are injured, then it would have to be one of the dumbest list management decisions in the history of the sport.
If he doesn't want to use Gov in the ruck then bring in a ruckman ffs not a KPD coming off a knee reco
Redden and Wellngham recieved no where near the amount of press that Jetta received when he played at East Perth.Just as bad that Redden is wearing the guernsey, so not sure that's the best argument.
We wouldn't have gotten a first round pick for Sinclair, so Redden was arguably the more expensive trade.
I guess Redden has the excuse of the hernia, but still, he's playing for EP, not in the rehab group.
Wellingham playing in the WAFL after an interrupted pre-season also was made into a massive deal in the media. For some reason Redden just flies straight under the radar.
Some types just get treated more harshly than others.
That was my point (about Redden anyway)Redden and Wellngham recieved no where near the amount of press that Jetta received when he played at East Perth.
MoreThat was my point (about Redden anyway)
Redden should be getting just as much scrutiny for not making the 22 given he cost us just as much if not more than Jetta.
He cost us the opportunity to trade Sinclair for a different player and/or draft pickJetta basically cost us nothing so I dont see why everyone gets so upset about him. He's not going anywhere.
Don't think the trade would have arisen if Jetta didn't want to leave. Chicken/egg.He cost us the opportunity to trade Sinclair for a different player and/or draft pick
MCGINNITY TO THE MIDFIELD!No mids on the bench
Nah, I reckon Sydney really wanted him and there were other teams looking for a ruckman as well.Don't think the trade would have arisen if Jetta didn't want to leave. Chicken/egg.
If both Jetta and Redden play at their prime Jetta is easily the better player. Jetta has shown he can be a match winner while Redden will be a very good role player. That is why Jetta cops it, what they cost us is not the issue.That was my point (about Redden anyway)
Redden should be getting just as much scrutiny for not making the 22 given he cost us just as much if not more than Jetta.
I think "he's a first ruck only" might be code for "he's not up to scratch around the ground and we can't carry him". If Lycett was injured instead of Nic Nat I reckon he would be in the team for sure. But I don't think we want to be carrying two lumbering big men as it makes us too top-heavy and slow. Not to mention Giles isn't in great form anyway.If so there is no point playing Brown over Giles.
If what you say about Simmo only wanting to use Giles as a single ruck is true, and the rationale in recruiting Giles was to play him only in the instance that both NN and Lycett are injured, then it would have to be one of the dumbest list management decisions in the history of the sport.
If he doesn't want to use Gov in the ruck then bring in a ruckman ffs not a KPD coming off a knee reco
you were right dave123 - the contested ball numbers will be interesting this week..I wasn't suprised Nelson was left out
I said a few times in this thread ....I like him and he will be a good player for us
Just think we needed hill in clearly ginners wasn't going to get dropped after four goals
I just don't think Brown is much different. Fair enough not playing Giles and bringing in one of the three mids who weren't selected, but Brown is a hack. IMOI think "he's a first ruck only" might be code for "he's not up to scratch around the ground and we can't carry him". If Lycett was injured instead of Nic Nat I reckon he would be in the team for sure. But I don't think we want to be carrying two lumbering big men as it makes us too top-heavy and slow. Not to mention Giles isn't in great form anyway.