Remove this Banner Ad

Politics Climate Change Paradox (cont in part 2)

Should we act now, or wait for a unified global approach


  • Total voters
    362

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm happy to have people silenced on climate change if they happen to be schoolchildren with a disability who don't know what they're talking about, especially when their speech centers around emotion rather than fact and they're trying to guilt trip people about their "stolen dreams and childhood".
Speech based around emotion used to guilt trip people. Hmmmm. I really hope you dont support Trump. It would make you a massive hypocrite.

The Un has resorted to emotion because too many idiots refuse to listen to rational scientific reasoning.
 
Probably cos the un climate change conference was in new york. Is this board getting stupider?
So what?

It wasn't long ago she spoke to Congress. Why isn't she trying to do the same thing in China, you know, the world's actual biggest polluters? It's a valid question.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

So what?

It wasn't long ago she spoke to Congress. Why isn't she trying to do the same thing in China, you know, the world's actual biggest polluters? It's a valid question.
Maybe cos the chinese communist government wouldnt give her a platform to speak while the UN did. This isnt hard to understand. You get she is a kid right? Do you want her to go to China and get locked up in a Chinese prison for protesting?
 
Maybe cos the chinese communist government wouldnt give her a platform to speak while the UN did. This isnt hard to understand. You get she is a kid right? Do you want her to go to China and get locked up in a Chinese prison for protesting?
That's precisely my point.

No amount of whining to the UN is going to change anything if China isn't convinced to take action on their end.
 
That's precisely my point.

No amount of whining to the UN is going to change anything if China isn't convinced to take action on their end.
Except ofcourse that china will more likely take action if the USa join back in and Europe go harder. The Chinese government have basically stated this in the last couple of days.
 
Except ofcourse that china will more likely take action if the USa join back in and Europe go harder. The Chinese government have basically stated this in the last couple of days.
Wake me up when that actually happens.

Until then, soak in the hysterical blabbering from a 16 year old girl that'll achieve nothing. I hope she studies real hard, becomes and engineer and contributes to potential solutions instead of alienating people via slacktivism. And let's be honest here, her delivery is going to hinder more than it'll help. She is obnoxiously grating and sanctimonious... in other words, she's annoying as fug. It's going to rub a lot of people the wrong way, and I'm not talking about the people who deny man-made climate change.

Didn't she win over $200,000 just very recently? Hope she puts her money where her mouth is.
 
Wake me up when that actually happens.

Until then, soak in the hysterical blabbering from a 16 year old girl that'll achieve nothing. I hope she studies real hard, becomes and engineer and contributes to potential solutions instead of alienating people via slacktivism. And let's be honest here, her delivery is going to hinder more than it'll help. She is obnoxiously grating and sanctimonious... in other words, she's annoying as fug. It's going to rub a lot of people the wrong way, and I'm not talking about the people who deny man-made climate change.

Didn't she win over $200,000 just very recently? Hope she puts her money where her mouth is.
Wake you up when the usa and europe does something? So you agree with her now. Thats basically her point.

Plus you do get that China was also at the conference right?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

You cant.

Remenber when your initial point was about the girl not having a go at china. Well she did both indirectly by having a go at usa and europe and directly because china was f*** there as well. Just admit you were wrong.
I'm not wrong when I say that her sanctimonious ranting and raving will do **** all, which was my entire point. Why do you think I mentioned China in the first place?
 
The alarmists latest cult hero

without a script.






But she's not a carefully stage managed puppet at all.

Oh hell no.


Couldn't the handlers interject and wheel her away this time?



.
This is Church of Scientology level stuff.



.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Woopy do. For humans to stop climate change the usa and europe need to have a carbon budget of -150 percent relative to 2000 levels. +98 percent does basically nothing.

Which would send us back to living in caves.
And that's the point.

Any meaningful change is not going to happen.
Does she sound more or less coherant than donald trump?

Less.
 
Does she sound more or less coherant than donald trump?


A very good point you raise there. This is a reason for hope.

Now all she has to do is gain U.S. citizenship, then run for the presidency in the hope that she encounters an opposition that is so pathetic that she actually wins!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top