Politics Climate Change Paradox (cont in part 2)

[JackOutback]

Cool phraseology.

You’re certainly on safer ground policing grammar auto corrects than you are on climate change.

 

[Demontim275]

You’re certainly on safer ground policing grammar auto corrects than you are on climate change.

Called it.
he literally linked his post in another thread doing the exact same thing.

 

[Crankitup]

You’re certainly on safer ground policing grammar auto corrects than you are on climate change.

Meaning you see yourself as a comparable intellectual giant on the issue I presume?

Goody. I may have finally found a person who can answer a question I first posed here in 2008 =>>>> #53 (last paragragh) and many times since, most recently here =>>>> #1,660 to absolute silence from all you knowing, wise, alarmists who claim to have such a comprehensive grasp on the subject. Please convert me back to alarmism, I'm all for it. It will probably free up some of my time for a start.

You will note that I haven't changed my selection for the poll for this thread since the first time I posted here.

 

[Demontim275]

Seems he’s a creationist too...

and apparently has been having the same s**t said about him since 2008. Ignores it. Then repeats himself.

 

[Crankitup]

Seems he’s a creationist too...

Ignore the issue ... go for the man. Seems you've been reading my signature. I would be surprised if you would find any posts from me about creationism for more than a decade. A time during which I was facing death having been diagnosed with leukaemia (APML). Confronted with death you would be surprised what people will turn to.

and apparently has been having the same s**t said about him since 2008. Ignores it. Then repeats himself.

The same s**t. What is that BTW?

 

[Demontim275]

Ignore the issue ... go for the man. I would be surprised if you would find any posts from me about creationism for more than a decade. A time during which I was facing death having been diagnosed with leukaemia (APML). Confronted with death you would be surprised what people will turn to.



The same s**t. What is that BTW?

So you want to claim some superior science knowledge, but also that you were a creationist...

Hey. You keep quoting posts from over a decade ago. Don’t whinge when they get discussed

exactly what’s being said here. Light on actual content. Heavy on spelling, deflection and semantics.

 

[Crankitup]

So you want to claim some superior science knowledge, but also that you were a creationist...

When have I ever claimed that?

exactly what’s being said here. Light on actual content. Heavy on spelling, deflection and semantics.

How ironic from a person that refuses to discuss the science. It's obvious you're still smarting from what I said to you in #3,444. Unable to respond to that you're reduced to stalking me and trawling through decades old posts for 'dirt'. Pathetic. Want me to point out some of your embarrassing views on a diverse range of topics or do you want to man up and tackle #3,453 ?

Even more ironic is your rant on spelling. I mean just last month you denigrated someone for not spelling nutritionist correctly.

 

[Demontim275]

When have I ever claimed that?



How ironic from a person that refuses to discuss the science. It's obvious you're still smarting from what I said to you in #3,444. Unable to respond to that you're reduced to stalking me and trawling through decades old posts for 'dirt'. Pathetic. Want me to point out some of your embarrassing views on a diverse range of topics or do you want to man up and tackle #3,453 ?

Even more ironic is your rant on spelling. I mean just last month you denigrated someone for not spelling nutritionist correctly.

View attachment 799801

Oh my. Not only do you keep records of your posts from other forums from decades ago

you keep track of your interactions with people on here in other threads. Do you have a list of things that upset you?

you brought up your old posts. Even linked them. Don’t get pissy if they get discussed.
The spelling in that conversation was relevant. Since the poster was claiming nutritional expertise but thought a qualified person was called a “nutriotionalist”

As I said you’d deflect, pick at spelling, then repeat. You’ve done exactly that. Well done.

 

[Crankitup]

Oh my. Not only do you keep records of your posts from other forums from decades ago you keep track of your interactions with people on here in other threads.

FMD I've broken you haven't I. Keep records? No I don't keep records. I just use the search button, just like you.

you brought up your old posts. Even linked them.

Yes I linked to a question I asked over a decade ago about the science. A question that remains unanswered. Care to answer it or just keep deflecting like you have been by playing personalities?

 

[Snake_Baker]

Is this the only time her handlers have let her near a scientist?

 

[Snake_Baker]

Oh dear.

 

[Bazzar]

You seem to say this in many threads

every topic you discuss you claim you used to be on side x but after research decided to flip and use it as an attempt to show authority. Seems disingenous.

I feel used. You're stalking someone else behind my back? How dare you.,

 

[Demontim275]

I feel used. You're stalking someone else behind my back? How dare you.,

Following me over three threads... creepy

Still waiting for your responses to questions about the Mooroolbark murder. Haven’t been able to get past “blacks did it. Medea covered up” yet. Pls elaborate

 

[Bazzar]

Is this the only time her handlers have let her near a scientist?

Attenboura. "How long can you go on saying the same thing with the same impact , of course you can't "

Thats why Greta will be discarded sooner rather than later.

 

[Bazzar]

Following me over three threads... creepy

Still waiting for your responses to questions about the Mooroolbark murder. Haven’t been able to get past “blacks did it. Medea covered up” yet. Pls elaborate

Your obviously dumb *, thread notifications Timmy, get it?

 

[Ron The Bear]

Is this the only time her handlers have let her near a scientist?

Very interesting.

How would people react if Alex Rance beat them over the head with The Watchtower until they "got it"?

A question about "the patriarchy" would've been nice.

 

[Demontim275]

Your obviously dumb fu**, thread notifications Timmy, get it?

So you’re responding here because “thread notifications” but don’t respond to questions about why you hate black people?
maybe you don’t get how the notifications work.

bit too much to drink last night old mate? Getting pretty pissy over multiple threads and they’re bordering incoherent

 

[Brunswick Trap King]

CO₂ makes up 0.038% of the earth's atmosphere. Anthropogenic CO₂ makes up 2-3% of that 0.038% depending on your source.

Where did you get these figures from? Or are they just another invented reality of yours?

 

[Snake_Baker]

What's so far fetched about it herc?

400ppm = 10,000/4 = 0.04%

Although I would agree that AGW/CO2 is virtually impossible to correctly assign, if that is your claim.

 

[Damp Squarie]

Attenboura. "How long can you go on saying the same thing with the same impact , of course you can't "

Thats why Greta will be discarded sooner rather than later.

Can it be sooner than sooner?

 

[Snake_Baker]

A society that has its priorities all wrong.

 

[Ron The Bear]

Where did you get these figures from? Or are they just another invented reality of yours?

Seriously? You're debating climate change and that's the first time you've seen those numbers?

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

A society that has its priorities all wrong.

For someone rallying against the “hysterics” you sure carry on about a 16yr old girl a lot.

Time magazine is not “society”, nor is it a Nobel prize. It’s one publications thoughts on who they think impacted the world the most in that given year - which she undoubtedly did.

 

[Snake_Baker]

For someone rallying against the “hysterics” you sure carry on about a 16yr old girl a lot.

Time magazine is not “society”, nor is it a Nobel prize. It’s one publications thoughts on who they think impacted the world the most in that given year - which she undoubtedly did.

................anyway..................how about that Morgan Vague?

 

[JackOutback]

For someone rallying against the “hysterics” you sure carry on about a 16yr old girl a lot.

Time magazine is not “society”, nor is it a Nobel prize. It’s one publications thoughts on who they think impacted the world the most in that given year - which she undoubtedly did.

For all his criticisms of others, he’s an ideologue pushing a fanatical cause. He’s just dressed it up better than others.