- Joined
- Sep 3, 2012
- Posts
- 10,875
- Reaction score
- 15,307
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Banned
- #8,051
We are seriously going to get Dunn. Lol. He is useless.
say it to my face campaigner
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
We are seriously going to get Dunn. Lol. He is useless.
Crows last year for Dangerfield.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Why are we going after Dunn?
It's so bad that it's laughable.
Actually pretty happy with picking up Dunn for peanuts.
I feel like I'm going to be the only one though...
No, can see plenty other hardcore Buckley apologists rapt with this move.
Because we have limited choice?
Also averaged 14 touches and 4 marks this season in limited games. Brown averaged 11. Its hard to measure but looks like an upgrade.No I'm also keen on Dunn, averaged 4.32 rebound 50s in 2015, putting him 9th in the league.
For reference, Reid averaged 4.41 this year, putting him 8th in the league.
Neither Frost or Brown made the top 100.....
If we plan on playing counter attacking football, he would be a good replacement for those 2.
Bernie Vince seems a bit underrated on here he was a quality player for Adelaide then went to Melbourne and has been practically their best mid.
I think Adams is a quality player for us and is around Vinces mark when fully fit.
Is Dunn an upgrade on Brown? The last time I paid attention to him he was a forward.
What, depth for Keeffe?Don't mind Dunn. Will be good backline depth incase we get a few backline injuries. Will cost nothing.
I prefer no one over him. He is bad.
They did that to force a trade because they weren't going to get fair value from FA compensation. They didn't do it to retain him, which is what you are suggesting we should have done.
Patrick Smith wrote an article about it last night. He says up to 4 year bans. I think your mate may have read the article.Guess we will find out, Ban would be huge if that's the case.
What, depth for Keeffe?
My god does no one else see the issue here!
Why are we going after Dunn?
It's so bad that it's laughable.
I'll only be happy with Dunn if he costs us a pick worth no points.
I still remember the absolute bath he gave Cloke a year or two ago.