Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Contracts/Trade Thread - 2025 Edition Vol 3

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #15
Quick Links

List Changes - 2025
In:
  • Brandon Starcevich arrives at West Coast in a three team deal
  • Tylar Young (Richmond) arrived at West Coast in exchange for Pick 38.
  • Deven Robertson (Brisbane) has agreed to join West Coast and will be signed on to the rookie list after being delisted by Brisbane
Out:
  • Oscar Allen joins Brisbane as a FA - West Coast receive Pick 2 as compensation
  • Liam Ryan and a 2027 R3 pick has been traded to St Kilda for a 2026 R2 pick
  • Campbell Chesser has been traded to Carlton for Pick 41
  • Jayden Hunt announces retirement
  • Jack Petruccelle, Callum Jamieson and Loch Rawlinson not offered new contracts
  • Coen Livingstone joins the list of players not offered a new contract

Players Out of Contract - 2025 (0)
  • Jamie Cripps and Malakai Champion seem to have been offered new contracts despite there being no official announcement. Means that all players out of contract for 2025 have been given new contracts despite or removed from the playing list

2025 Draft Order

Current Draft Picks:
Round 1: 1, 2, 13
Round 2: 34, 41
Round 3: 53, 58 (These picks are in excess of available list spots so will be forfeited if we don’t consolidate our 2025 picks up the order or trade some for future picks)

List Spots Available (39 of 48):
• Main list (33 of 38) - 5* (in: Starcevich, Young out: Allen, Ryan, Chesser, Hunt, Petruccelle, Jamieson)
• Cat A rookie list (5 of 8) - 3* (in: Robertson (pending), out: Rawlinson)
• Cat B rookie list (1 of 2) - 2 (out: Livingstone)

* Based on Dewar being upgraded after the maximum 3 years on the rookie list. Hutchinson may also have been upgraded but this isn’t confirmed - if it is we will have 4 main and 4 rookie list spots open

* Matthew Clarke has stated we have 5 main list spots

Matt Clarke wraps up the trade period - 6PR
 
Last edited:
Sharp at pick 2 is too big a risk. Good as he is in his position, his lack of athleticism makes it that much harder to translate it to AFL level.

Need to remember the guys in the AFL are the best of the best across probably 10-12 drafts. That's who he'll be going up against.

I'd be pretty disappointed if at pick 2 he only ever becomes a role player.
Sharp's the best inside mid available in this draft, something we sorely lack. He's a bull who will dive into the bottom of a scrum and emerge with the footy.

Priddis had f*ck-all athleticism and did the same thing.
Both of these are perfectly good takes and both right.

I agree with D4E - I consider Masten a waste of a pick at 3 despite 200+ games. I know objectively and based on return this is probably the wrong take but it’s how I feel and how I’ve always felt.

I also agree with Woosh that based on the YouTube highlights, the odd game I’ve watched online and the expert aggregate take that Dyson Sharp is both the best pure inside mid and the best fit for our list.

If we took Sharp at 2 I wouldn’t be disappointed for reasons shared by Woosh unless it transpired we turned down an opportunity to improve on favourable terms (say, Essendon’s picks)
 
By getting picks back...
But everyone will be looking at that and seeing a buyers market for their picks.

I could see us trading out everything after pick 2 to GC for an excess from their hand in 2026/2027 (after all, they'll be in deficit anyway, so they don't want to keep those picks).

If we can't move 13 up then 13, 34, 41, 52 and our FF2 for 29, F1, FF1 and F2. Start setting ourselves up with draft capital for next year. We have the points, they need the points - we have the hand. Our risk is bids on Banfield and Williams, but probably an acceptable risk.

Essendon (21/27/30) are probably the only other club with picks that could interest GC.

(This would be a draft day sort of deal though as even with the player fire sale they've been doing GC probably don't have the list spots to hold all those picks)
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

But is he quick?

If not he sounds like Culley.

Big bodied mid.

To be talked up at pick 2 you need to be reasonably quick surely?

Robey looks to be faster than Bont and he spreads really well looking for the handball receives .. He’s got leadership qualities as he demands the ball and backs himself to win the contests ..
 
Interesting decisions to be made this year - if no more trades occur and we go into the draft with 1, 2, 13:
  • Pick 1 for Duursma seems like a no-brainer. Position of need, best available talent.
  • Pick 2 - do we go for best talent available (CDT?) OR best talent in a position of need (Mid)?
  • Pick 13 - taking best talent available probably makes the most sense this late in the draft
Picking the best available talent is generally the best approach - but our midfield is dire & I think Mini/Woosh/Pyke see it that way.

I know we might be able to "extract maximum value" by trading pick 2 for something like 7/8 - but personally, i'd have no qualms picking the third or fourth best talent if they were a midfielder.

E.g. We could:
  • Get Sharp/Robey or whichever mid we rate highest at pick 2
  • Put the pick squeeze on GC by picking Uwland/Patterson (perhaps with pick 1) if they overpay for Trac and snag one of these
 
But everyone will be looking at that and seeing a buyers market for their picks.

I could see us trading out everything after pick 2 to GC for an excess from their hand in 2026/2027 (after all, they'll be in deficit anyway, so they don't want to keep those picks).

If we can't move 13 up then 13, 34, 41, 52 and our FF2 for 29, F1, FF1 and F2. Start setting ourselves up with draft capital for next year. We have the points, they need the points - we have the hand. Our risk is bids on Banfield and Williams, but probably an acceptable risk.

Essendon (21/27/30) are probably the only other club with picks that could interest GC.

(This would be a draft day sort of deal though as even with the player fire sale they've been doing GC probably don't have the list spots to hold all those picks)
The future deficit is worth around pick 10/11, so if they think they will finish top 8 (they do think that!) and they think they can get more points in 2025 than the deficit (they can) then I think they trade their F1. FF1 maybe also depending on points needed.

The question is can we find a way to get enough points and ideally keep 13, to make it worth their while (I know no bids 1/2 is massive…. But also we can’t actually offer that).
 
Interesting decisions to be made this year - if no more trades occur and we go into the draft with 1, 2, 13:
  • Pick 1 for Duursma seems like a no-brainer. Position of need, best available talent.
  • Pick 2 - do we go for best talent available (CDT?) OR best talent in a position of need (Mid)?
  • Pick 13 - taking best talent available probably makes the most sense this late in the draft
Picking the best available talent is generally the best approach - but our midfield is dire & I think Mini/Woosh/Pyke see it that way.

I know we might be able to "extract maximum value" by trading pick 2 for something like 7/8 - but personally, i'd have no qualms picking the third or fourth best talent if they were a midfielder.

E.g. We could:
  • Get Sharp/Robey or whichever mid we rate highest at pick 2
  • Put the pick squeeze on GC by picking Uwland/Patterson (perhaps with pick 1) if they overpay for Trac and snag one of these
I'd actually consider seeing whether Essendon or North wanted to trade their two picks in the 20's for pick 13, depending on who was left there. And using those two mid 20's picks for Freddy and Curtin.
 
I think it’s very unlikely that Gold Coast don’t match bids for Uwland and Patterson and despite some rather odd trades in the past they have proven themselves to be very adept at collating the points needed to match bids

So I doubt we get Patterson

But by trading out 7 and 8 with only 24 coming back as is being suggested, they’re leaving themselves vulnerable. Especially if we lodge bids with picks 1 and 2
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Can we take none of the above? They all have fatal flaws.
I mean all players we use these rookie spots for are going to have fatal flaws.

Personally I love the idea of picking up:
  • some discarded mids from clubs with stacked midfielders
  • top state league players who might be able to translate their games to AFL.
Worst case they never make it at AFL level but are good people, bring strong AFL-level training standards and make our WAFL team instantly better - our final WAFL games this year with Gross being the only recognised mid on our AFL list was a J.O.K.E. We can't develop young players in the WAFL in an uncompetitive team.

Best case they become solid role-players in the AFL within our midfield structure, leveraging their best attributes while buffering their flaws in other areas.
 
What happened with Petch signing with Carlton? I see he is now going to sign with a WAFL club.

Blues were really keen last I heard.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

2,13,F2 for 7,8,F1 would be ballsy
Dees could easily fall apart next year and be worse than us... a real tantilising death ride

Sesame Street Muppets GIF by Muppet Wiki
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top