Remove this Banner Ad

Corona virus, Port and the AFL. Part 4.

🄰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can she blame the vaccine? šŸ˜‚

mom a serious note, interesting panel interview from Dr’s in US. I’m trying to listen without bias, perhaps you try also.




Thanks for the Link. Rick

Interesting listen.
 
If there’s anyone that actually looks like a lizard person, it’s Zucherberg.
 
Thanks for the Link. Rick

Interesting listen.

It's really not. Deliberately misleading listen would be a better descriptor.

Why have they deliberately brought together a bunch of controversial people to spout the same opinions? What is the agenda for putting this "discussion" together? Why is it being shared on nothing but lunatic fringe conspiracy nutjob sites?

https://www.nationaltimesaustralia....s-scientists-engage-in-a-remarkable-exchange/

Clive Palmer foundation.

Look at each of the Panel members individually. There's a random GP from Missouri and one from Florida. They've hand picked a bunch of ****ing extremist looneys to deliberately muddy the waters. If the goal was to have an intelligent discussion why did they stack the panel with people with the same "controversial" views? These people have been discredited over and over. Posting this kind of misinformation is really dangerous. Literally every one on that panel is a notorious anti vaxer or horse paste advocate.

Rick has time to watch this nonsense but no time to view the medical information from tens of thousands of legitimate sources.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

It's really not. Deliberately misleading listen would be a better descriptor.
Why have they deliberately brought together a bunch of controversial people to spout the same opinions? What is the agenda for putting this "discussion" together?

Do you think the concept of a virus mutating being controversial ? This in evolution and been going on for millions of, if not, billions of years.

People are allowed to have a different opinion, most brilliant minds from history were at one time considered "controversial' Please never close your mind off to other thoughts, at the end of the day its your choice which to listen to and believe.

I like to hear different aspects, just because I find something interesting does not always mean I agree with it or even some of it, doesn't mean it is not interesting.
 
Do you think the concept of a virus mutating being controversial ? This in evolution and been going on for millions of, if not, billions of years.

People are allowed to have a different opinion, most brilliant minds from history were at one time considered "controversial' Please never close your mind off to other thoughts, at the end of the day its your choice which to listen to and believe.

I like to hear different aspects, just because I find something interesting does not always mean I agree with it or even some of it, doesn't mean it is not interesting.
there is an eye doctor, a dermatologist and a psychiatrist who says that kids IQs born after 2020 are down 20 points. As if you can measure IQs on babies.

These people are fruit loops.

There's nothing wrong with seeking alternative views but you need to check sources.
 
It's really not. Deliberately misleading listen would be a better descriptor.

Why have they deliberately brought together a bunch of controversial people to spout the same opinions? What is the agenda for putting this "discussion" together? Why is it being shared on nothing but lunatic fringe conspiracy nutjob sites?

https://www.nationaltimesaustralia....s-scientists-engage-in-a-remarkable-exchange/

Clive Palmer foundation.

Look at each of the Panel members individually. There's a random GP from Missouri and one from Florida. They've hand picked a bunch of ******* extremist looneys to deliberately muddy the waters. If the goal was to have an intelligent discussion why did they stack the panel with people with the same "controversial" views? These people have been discredited over and over. Posting this kind of misinformation is really dangerous. Literally every one on that panel is a notorious anti vaxer or horse paste advocate.

Rick has time to watch this nonsense but no time to view the medical information from tens of thousands of legitimate sources.

Blinkers


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
I have heard of Joe before. He has a popular podcast and makes millions from being a conspiracy theorist. He has people like Alex Jones on his podcast, so enough said.

I'm not a Joe Rogan fanboy, but I know enough to know this is a really, really inaccurate way of describing him and what he does.

His whole thing is that he has anybody and everybody on his podcast. I know at least one co-worker who is obsessed with him.
 
Let's see who else we got on the panel - Mr horse paste himself Dr Kory

Kory is president and co-founder of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC),[a] a small U.S. organization of physicians and former journalists formed in April 2020 that advocates for ineffective COVID-19 treatments, including ivermectin.[9][1][2][10] The FLCCC falsely states that ivermectin reduces viral load and accelerates recovery in patients, while the World Health Organization, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and European Medicines Agency advise against the use of ivermectin outside of clinical trials.[11][12][13]

On December 8, 2020, Kory was a witness at a Senate hearing called by the US Senate Homeland Security Committee Chair Ron Johnson,[14] which was criticized as promoting fringe ideas about COVID-19.[15] Kory described ivermectin as "miraculous" and as a "wonder drug" to be used against COVID-19. Video footage of his statements went viral on social media, receiving over one million views within a few days.[3] Kory became a leading advocate of the use of ivermectin throughout the pandemic, promoting a conspiracy theory that its true effectiveness was being suppressed by the "Gods of Science" who wanted to monopolize scientific information.[16] Kory resigned from Aurora St Luke's afterwards, claiming new contracts threatened to limit his freedom to speak.[7][8]
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Let's see who else is on the panel shall we

Dr Ryan Cole

Dr. Ryan Cole, a derma-pathologist in Garden City, is under investigation by the Washington Medical Commission. Cole received a physician license in Washington in 2007, and is licensed in several other western states.
He has drawn criticism from medical doctors and health officials for spreading misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic, including touting the use of the anti-parasite drug Ivermectin as a treatment for the virus, despite both the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control warning that it has not been proven effective against COVID-19. Cole has also opposed the COVID-19 vaccine, referring to it as "needle rape and a "clot shot."

A group representing thousands of Idaho physicians has also filed a complaint against Cole with the Idaho Board of Medicine, alleging he is practicing outside the "standard of care."
 
I'm not a Joe Rogan fanboy, but I know enough to know this is a really, really inaccurate way of describing him and what he does.

His whole thing is that he has anybody and everybody on his podcast. I know at least one co-worker who is obsessed with him.
Spotify gave him a million for a start
 
The unvaxxed will be talking loudly about something Joe Rogan said.

ā€œinstead of vaccines, why aren’t the authorities talking more about boosting your natural immunity by doing things like eating right, getting enough sleep and working out?!ā€, says man who upon becoming infected took:

• Ivermectin
• Azithromycin
• Monoclonal antibodies
• Prednisolone
• IV vitamins
• IV NAD

🤪
 

🄰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

ā€œinstead of vaccines, why aren’t the authorities talking more about boosting your natural immunity by doing things like eating right, getting enough sleep and working out?!ā€, says man who upon becoming infected took:

• Ivermectin
• Azithromycin
• Monoclonal antibodies
• Prednisolone
• IV vitamins
• IV NAD

🤪

And shills for overpriced MAN SIZED herbal supplements and gas station boner pills.
 
It's really not. Deliberately misleading listen would be a better descriptor.

Why have they deliberately brought together a bunch of controversial people to spout the same opinions? What is the agenda for putting this "discussion" together? Why is it being shared on nothing but lunatic fringe conspiracy nutjob sites?

https://www.nationaltimesaustralia....s-scientists-engage-in-a-remarkable-exchange/

Clive Palmer foundation.

Look at each of the Panel members individually. There's a random GP from Missouri and one from Florida. They've hand picked a bunch of ******* extremist looneys to deliberately muddy the waters. If the goal was to have an intelligent discussion why did they stack the panel with people with the same "controversial" views? These people have been discredited over and over. Posting this kind of misinformation is really dangerous. Literally every one on that panel is a notorious anti vaxer or horse paste advocate.

Rick has time to watch this nonsense but no time to view the medical information from tens of thousands of legitimate sources.
I’m on the novavax band wagon, hopefully out soon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🄰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top