Snake_Baker
The one true King of the North
- Apr 24, 2013
- 81,024
- 153,169
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Essendon Lawn Bowls Club
- Banned
- #5,876
Excellent post.
Even the initial comment you responded to had politicised it by throwing scare quotes around the term.
As you said, why on Earth would Russia want to medically compromise its own population?
In my experience of looking at research proposals, I was stunned to find that Russia (Brazil was another one which disproportionately appeared to pop up) seems to provide monetary support to a significant number of really good medical studies across the Western world. No politics infused with that money, as they would often be accused of, just lots of grants to help fight cancer and other diseases. Meanwhile a lot of these researchers couldn't get a dime from their own governments.
They have a strong scientific culture and it wouldn't surprise me if they were first to it.
IMO, Russia is a superior country to many western countries, including ours.
They have a strong scientific culture and it wouldn't surprise me if they were first to it. There are risks, as there always are, but if it has satisfied the general scientific scrutiny that gets applied to observing side effects as you've outlined here, well I guess that's all they can do, short of observing it for years.
It becomes a matter of practicality with millions dying, so if it has gone through the necessary protocols with good results and no significant side effects, then it's reasonable to release it for use. The alternative scenario being that millions more could die if the medial community procrastinates.
What the article refers to as "phase III trials" is designed to weed out the outliers, such as genetic & comorbidity susceptible patients, but if trials found it worked well with relatively healthy recipients, then there's no need to be overly critical with wide spread release, and for all I know Russia has limited it's use for only healthy members of it's community. I see no reason to believe this vaccine is dangerous, as it's basiclaly just two variants of chopped up pieces of the Sars-CoV-2 spike receptor that are injected in to patients so they can manufacture the respective S protein specific antibodies who will seek out the virus in vivo, bind to it's S protein receptors that it needs to gain entry in to cells, rendering it inert/activate the complement pathway/recruit T cells to come and wipe out the ****er.
Last edited: