Remove this Banner Ad

NO TROLLS Rankine handed a 4 match suspension by the AFL integrity unit for a homophobic slur against opponent

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Interesting choice by the Crom to send Darcy Fogarty out to face the media this morning.

Poor Fog was fighting for his life not knowing how to answer any of those questions without throwing Rankine under the bus or getting cancelled himself.

Tough scenes.
Fog's performance reminded me a bit of this masterpiece

 
Couldn’t that he didn’t have an opportunity to sell - report in that case?

Or at least less of an opportunity than Graham.

Sam maclure said he has to me than Graham because he didn’t self report

Being the LAST person to report it does not classify as self reporting/owning your actions. All that’s saying is “oh bugger better do something I’m screwed here”.

Graham got a week off due to owning up and self reporting.

A 4-5 week suspension is bang on in this case. I feel for the Crows fans I don’t feel for Issac not one single bit.
 
AFL backed themselves into a corner again. Legislating certain words and not others is unworkable and inconsistent.

The ONLY half decent way to approach this was the same way they do with most other things ie first offence, second offence, third. Then you have some wiggle room.

But as usual they didnt look further in front of themselves than the irrelevant player they could hang out to dry to score a win with 'inclusion'
4-5 weeks is the first offence. We haven't seen what the 2nd offence is.
 
AFL isn’t backed into a corner. Izak is. Utterly self-inflicted.

The AFL will be fine, they will have put 5 weeks on the table without blinking. The Crows are the ones desperately trying to navigate a way out of it.

Yep expecting to go in the middle and I’m “okay with it being 4”.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

It's shit. There are a million different insults you can use. Choosing one rooted in hatred towards a marginalised group is a stain on someone's character.

Gotta be honest, I still dont look at Tex Walker the same.

Great player and all, and he appeared genuinely contrite about what he did, but you're always going to wonder if it was a genuine **** up or something he actually thinks deep down.
 
so you're assuming that you'll win a home prelim against anyone?

noting that you beat Collingwood and Brisbane by less than a goal at home and were outplayed in both games.
you also lost to Geelong.

I agree you would be a chance of beating those three teams but would put it in 50/50 territory you seem to be assuming you'd beat them.
I'm assuming I wouldn't choose an away prelim over a home prelim.. what are you even reading?

Did you even read the quoted post?
 
4-5 weeks is the first offence. We haven't seen what the 2nd offence is.

No. You're misinterpreting the AFL's direction on homophobic and racist slurs. The penalties and their escalation are aimed at stamping out the offence across the competition. Each new offence raises the bar for all.

The base suspension is now five weeks, unless there are mitigating circumstances. Regardless of who commits the offence.
 
Being the LAST person to report it does not classify as self reporting/owning your actions. All that’s saying is “oh bugger better do something I’m screwed here”.

Graham got a week off due to owning up and self reporting.

A 4-5 week suspension is bang on in this case. I feel for the Crows fans I don’t feel for Issac not one single bit.

It seems you’ve ignored my point .

Other parties reported sooner than they did in the Graham case. Do we know that Rankine wouldn’t have self-reported if given more time ?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

No. You're misinterpreting the AFL's direction on homophobic and racist slurs. The penalties and their escalation are aimed at stamping out the offence across the competition.

The base suspension is now five weeks, unless there are mitigating circumstances. Regardless of who commits the offence.

Are you saying that the penalty wouldn’t/ shouldn’t increase if the same player does it again?
 
Are you saying that the penalty wouldn’t/ shouldn’t increase if the same player does it again?
No.

I'm saying that according to the AFL stated position on homophobic slurs (unless mitigating circumstances apply) Rankine is bound by the precedent penalty set for the previous offence. That is five weeks minimum.

This is just me quoting an AFL previously stated position. It could of course change at any time.
 
No. You're misinterpreting the AFL's direction on homophobic and racist slurs. The penalties and their escalation are aimed at stamping out the offence across the competition. Each new offence raises the bar for all.

The base suspension is now five weeks, unless there are mitigating circumstances. Regardless of who commits the offence.
6 weeks is the most given to AFL players so the next is 7 weeks.
 
It seems you’ve ignored my point .

Other parties reported sooner than they did in the Graham case. Do we know that Rankine wouldn’t have self-reported if given more time ?

He doesn’t need to be “given more time” he should have been the first to do it straight after the match. That’s called being responsible and taking ownership. There’s no need to give the bloke a week to come to his senses
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

It seems you’ve ignored my point .

Other parties reported sooner than they did in the Graham case. Do we know that Rankine wouldn’t have self-reported if given more time ?
Lol…. It’s not self reporting if it already been reported. It’s like a criminal asking a judge for a lesser penalty because if you had more time and I was t arrested I was going to turn myself in
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NO TROLLS Rankine handed a 4 match suspension by the AFL integrity unit for a homophobic slur against opponent

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top