Cyril Rioli vs Daniel Wells

[Hawks92]

Rioli: 20 years old, 56 games

Wells: 25 years old, 142 games

 

[Brad Roo]

Did Cyril play one of his three good games for the year recently?

 

[HolyWars]

Did Cyril play one of his three good games for the year recently?

Daniel Wells career board.

 

[Brad Roo]

Rioli: 20 years old, 56 games

Wells: 25 years old, 142 games

^^^You should take note of the 66 out of a possible 110 games difference there.


Let's look at the stats closer

2010

Wells - 12 matches, 227 disposals (18.9), 63 marks (5.2), 11 goals (1), 24 tackles (2)

Rioli - 12 matches, 191 disposals (15.9), 48 marks (4), 17 goals (1.4), 58 tackles (4.9)

After 56 games


Wells - 56 matches, 845 disposals (15.1), 214 marks (3.8), 32 goals (0.6), 111 tackles (2)

Rioli - 56 matches, 833 disposals (14.8), 220 marks (3.9), 62 goals (1.1), 234 tackles (4.2)


Cyril has the advantage in tackles, but that is primary to his role.

Otherwise, there's not too much in it.

It's unfortunate that Daniels OP has severely stifled his momentum as he was tracking at 25 disposals a match the last time he was able to string a dozen matches together. It would also benefit Daniel if he had the luxury of playing 3rd banana behind Franklin and Roughead instead of drawing the number 1 tagger for most of his career.

 

[gibbanator]

Bad poll, Wells should be compared to Tambling not Rioli as Wells has underachieved.

 

[Brown n Gold]

^^^You should take note of the 66 out of a possible 110 games difference there.


Let's look at the stats closer

2010

Wells - 12 matches, 227 disposals (18.9), 63 marks (5.2), 11 goals (1), 24 tackles (2)

Rioli - 12 matches, 191 disposals (15.9), 48 marks (4), 17 goals (1.4), 58 tackles (4.9)

After 56 games


Wells - 56 matches, 845 disposals (15.1), 214 marks (3.8), 32 goals (0.6), 111 tackles (2)

Rioli - 56 matches, 833 disposals (14.8), 220 marks (3.9), 62 goals (1.1), 234 tackles (4.2)


Cyril has the advantage in tackles, but that is primary to his role.

Otherwise, there's not too much in it.

It's unfortunate that Daniels OP has severely stifled his momentum as he was tracking at 25 disposals a match the last time he was able to string a dozen matches together. It would also benefit Daniel if he had the luxury of playing 3rd banana behind Franklin and Roughead instead of drawing the number 1 tagger for most of his career.

LOL at this comment, Daniel has the luxury of being about 5th banana behind Harvey, Swallow, Bastinac, Ziebell and basically any other spud that the Kangas run through the midfield.

 

[B-Rock]

LOL at this comment, Daniel has the luxury of being about 5th banana behind Harvey, Swallow, Bastinac, Ziebell and basically any other spud that the Kangas run through the midfield.

You know that Wells gets heavily tagged every week yeah?

 

[Brad Roo]

LOL at this comment, Daniel has the luxury of being about 5th banana behind Harvey, Swallow, Bastinac, Ziebell and basically any other spud that the Kangas run through the midfield.

Idiot. Complete idiot.

 

[Rioli magic]

Did Cyril play one of his three good games for the year recently?

Idiot. Complete idiot.

Wells has been a let down. Partly due to injury, partly due to ticker.

 

[gibbanator]

Injuries are a weak excuse as wells has neither ticker or a work ethic.

 

[Brad Roo]

Injuries are a weak excuse as wells has neither ticker or a work ethic.

He would be Carltons 3rd best player.

 

[Dez!]

Cyril.

 

[tazhawk]

Rioli by the length of the Bass straight.

Wells has done about 6 magical things in his entire career, Cyril does that every game.

 

[Brad Roo]

Wells v Hawthorn 2010 - 20 disposals, 7 marks, 3 goals.

Rioli v North 2010 - 8 disposals, 3 marks, 1 goal.


It's no wonder North fans don't rate Rioli, he never does anything against us.

 

[madhawkboy]

So, Brad Roo is saying that Wells is better?

 

[DannyJ]

he would be carltons 3rd best player.

lol:d

 

[tazhawk]

Wells v Hawthorn 2010 - 20 disposals, 7 marks, 3 goals.

Rioli v North 2010 - 8 disposals, 3 marks, 1 goal.


It's no wonder North fans don't rate Rioli, he never does anything against us.

Amazing logic that.

How is this for some logic.

Cyril in his first season tore up the 2008 GF.

I have never seens Wells do that.

That is why Hawk fans do not rate Wells and his 3 good games a season.

Same sort of logic.

Once again its.

Cyril >>>>>>>>>>> daylight >>>>>>>>> more daylight >>>>>>>>> Andrew Swallow >>>>>>> Wells.

 

[DannyJ]

Wells v Hawthorn 2010 - 20 disposals, 7 marks, 3 goals.

Rioli v North 2010 - 8 disposals, 3 marks, 1 goal.


It's no wonder North fans don't rate Rioli, he never does anything against us.

So North fans don't watch football games other than there own?

Good don't comment on any other team unless they play North then. Ever.

 

[Brad Roo]

So, Brad Roo is saying that Wells is better?

When he's fit?

There's no doubt about that.

The discussion won't even be up for debate until Rioli can step in to the midfield full time.

 

[Rioli magic]

When he's fit?

There's no doubt about that.

The discussion won't even be up for debate until Rioli can step in to the midfield full time.

And when will Wells be able to do this?

 

[gibbanator]

When he's fit?

There's no doubt about that.

The discussion won't even be up for debate until Rioli can step in to the midfield full time.

Been injured for 8 years I take it then.

 

[TBoyleSuperstar]

Wells v Hawthorn 2010 - 20 disposals, 7 marks, 3 goals.

Rioli v North 2010 - 8 disposals, 3 marks, 1 goal.


It's no wonder North fans don't rate Rioli, he never does anything against us.

Interestin theory. based on this then we should start a poll, Adam Pattinson V Brent Harvey
Pattinson V North 2010 - 8 posessions, 1 mark, 1 point, 2 hit outs
Harvey V St Kilda 2010 - 5 posessions, 1 mark.

Daniel Wells has been an under performer for years. Rioli has had some poor games, but in his 50+ games he has shown more than Wells has thus far.
Wells - 56 matches, 845 disposals (15.1), 214 marks (3.8), 32 goals (0.6), 111 tackles (2)

Rioli - 56 matches, 833 disposals (14.8), 220 marks (3.9), 62 goals (1.1), 234 tackles (4.2)

Using yours stats, other than posessions, Rioli beats him hands down.

 

[Brad Roo]

Amazing logic that.

You have to wonder about someone that questions logic and then posts something like this:

Cyril >>>>>>>>>>> daylight >>>>>>>>> more daylight >>>>>>>>> Andrew Swallow >>>>>>> Wells.

Get off the internet and do your homework.

 

[Brad Roo]

Using yours stats, other than posessions, Rioli beats him hands down.

How can a bloke that averages less possessions beat someone with more possessions hands down?

Are all you Hawthorn flogs 8 years old?

 

[tazhawk]

You have to wonder about someone that questions logic and then posts something like this:




Get off the internet and do your homework.

Tell me what part of that was not true.

Geez Dude I know every person talks up their own teams players but if you seriously think that Wells is better than Rioli, all I can say is.

Get a clue, you are making a dick of yourself.