- Sep 10, 2010
- 18,149
- 25,267
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions

I wonder why neither GC nor Port preferred to deal with North. Their first pick next year should be a good one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
So the plan was to get x2 firsts, yet you said Demons never offered that, but go on to say Port's plans are now ruined. How are their plans ruined if Melbourne never offered that to begin with? Amazing logic.Melbourne has never, ever offered 2 first rounders for Houston.
And thanks to CP5, Houston staying at Port Adelaide has right royally ****ed up their trading and draft plans for this year. No other player worth anything to trade out and no draft picks means their stuck with the same group of players for next season.
Horrible situation to be in.
So the plan was to get x2 firsts, yet you said Demons never offered that, but go on to say Port's plans are now ruined. How are their plans ruined if Melbourne never offered that to begin with? Amazing logic.
The plans aren’t ruined, Port doesn’t want to let Houston go to begin with, which is why they’re telling his manager they want overs to let him go.
Port would be very happy if Dan does not request a trade; surely one Dan-the-man in Melbourne is enough for the Vics.So the plan was to get x2 firsts, yet you said Demons never offered that, but go on to say Port's plans are now ruined. How are their plans ruined if Melbourne never offered that to begin with? Amazing logic.
The plans aren’t ruined, Port doesn’t want to let Houston go to begin with, which is why they’re telling his manager they want overs to let him go.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I’m not an “ITK,” so I don’t know what’s been offered. I can only go off what others who are ITK have said and make sense of that. You’re the one making these claims not me.There is a very big difference between wanting 2 first round picks, which has been documented, that PA wanted and Melbourne offering 2 first round picks, which has been refuted on many occasions.
So go check your logic.
No draft capital means your plans are rooted.
And you dont have any player/s to trade out that would give 1 first round pick, let alone 2.
Like imagine thinking a top 2 team running it back is a “horrible situation to be in” or that barely any of our players are worth anything. You’ve even been on our boards saying Houston was only worth a 2nd.No other player worth anything to trade out and no draft picks means they’re stuck with the same group of players for next season.
Horrible situation to be in.
Fixed it for you.trolling hurts doesn't it.
A Post poster said so.....pphhtt.Link?
Port poster who has knowledge at the club who brought up Houston weeks ago and said 2 firsts were on the table by Melbourne.
Tom Morris has said this too.
Hasn’t been a single report, media person or anyone in the know from Melbourne’s side refute it at all.
Unless you have a link refuting it? Please post unless it’s just your opinion, then stfu dumb campaigner.
When did Melbourne express interest in Houston? If it was when you were top 4 then I can see you offering pick 16-18 + F1 (pick 16-18) for him but definitely not pick 6 + F1 (pick 4-6).A Post poster said so.....pphhtt.
Tom Morris has never said this.....pphhtt.
Why would Melbourne refute something they never said.......pphhtt.
Are all Port fans as thick as you. Or are you the only one.
Tom Morris has never said this.....pphhtt.
You can stop now you’re really not funny.
Oh for gods sake. Tom Morris said that Port wanted two first round picks not that Melbourne were offering 2 first round picks.
You can stop now you're really not funny.
Did you watch the video or just read the tweet? Skip to the 0.47 mark and turn your speakers up.Oh for gods sake. Tom Morris said that Port wanted two first round picks not that Melbourne were offering 2 first round picks.
You can stop now you're really not funny.
Can you please enlighten us on what our draft and trading strategy is in detail so we know the extent of the disarray it’s in? Is it just one of our best players potentially not moving on that has ruined all of our plans?Your draft and trading strategy is in dissarray. Go figure.
Melbourne has never, ever offered 2 first rounders for Houston.
And thanks to CP5, Houston staying at Port Adelaide has right royally ****ed up their trading and draft plans for this year. No other player worth anything to trade out and no draft picks means their stuck with the same group of players for next season.
Horrible situation to be in.
dude, you scraped over the line against without Petracca. The ladder means very little.I didn't see anything from Port that makes me think that they're going to do much in the finals. Who are the father sons and nga player?Yer definitely sucks to be sitting 2nd with the majority of top players under 24 and have 2 father sons and a nga in this draft regardless if Houston leaves or not.
Add to it we are strongly in the running for both players from gws.
Why can't we be the current dumpster fire that is melb....![]()
2 father sons and a nga with picks 37 and 55. Ain’t going to happen.Yer definitely sucks to be sitting 2nd with the majority of top players under 24 and have 2 father sons and a nga in this draft regardless if Houston leaves or not.
Add to it we are strongly in the running for both players from gws.
Why can't we be the current dumpster fire that is melb....![]()
NGA will be rookied?2 father sons and a nga with picks 37 and 55. Ain’t going to happen.