Remove this Banner Ad

Oppo Camp Dangerfield's Gone (Zero tolerance to trolling) - READ THREAD LINKED IN OP BEFORE POSTING

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So Danger is desperate to get to Geelong and Geelong are desperate to get him. That means we are dealing from a position of strength in a big way. 1 top 5 pick, 1 top 10 pick and a pick in the low 20's. If no good, it's off to the preseason draft for you.
Under trigg id have laughed at you. Under fagan... maybe
 
That worries me, is it just he's soft at the contest or one of those "should be a superstar, but hasn't put it together?".
The latter IMO.
He had a blinder against Carlton and he does something like that goal every so often.
He turns 24 next year too. That said, as a 190cm midfielder, who has played 60 games and has a lot of pace he could turn a corner very quickly. Also given that we suck in getting the ball out to him and Motlop etc perhaps he was a bit under-serviced.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Hang on. That is a massive risk you are taking.

What is that do finish in the top 6 and we only get pick 16.

We can not take that risk.

Pick 16, on top of wherever we finish is still quite good, and should see a very talented kid come through in the draft.

Or give us currency to trade.

So, sorry, i don't see this risk you're stating?
 
I'd be comfortable with that given the position we are in. Think Cockatoo and 2 first rounders is a bit of a stretch as that's effectively 3 years of first rounders. Would really hurt Geelong's list profile (which is already slightly skewed if they trade our draft picks).

Edit: just to clarify I think danger is worth 2 first rounders and cockatoo. I just don't think geelong would do it.

1st rounder and Cocktaoo.

We know what the Cats first rounder is this year, next year is unpredictable.

Take their **** and it will hurt their fans.
 
Happy with Free Agency and how it's currently structured .....have to really as risked "restraint of trade " actions

That said until those qualifications are met ......we have to stop this free movement of players as if under Free Agency

The Cam McCarthy request with 2 years on a contract is an example of how ridiculous it's getting ......player / club balance is way out of wack

Nathan Freeman wants out of Collingwood after two years and no games played ......why? ..because Collingwood put a performance based contract to him & St Kilda paying $300K per annum ......no games played in 2 years people :rolleyes:

Clubs should not be able to trade players in their initial rookie contract ......but thereafter should have full freedom to trade to whichever club it deems fit NOT the player having a say

It has to be fair .....ATM power has gone too far to players
 
You fool.

Mr-T-mrt-36834265-320-254.png

I hope this is David Noble after the trade period.

I-love-it-when-a-plan-comes-together.jpg
 
Well at least he's not on our ******* calendar. In be4 sanctions etc because we obviously knew months ago

I call bs we didnt know back then. It would be akin to Fyfe, Buddy or Ablett not being on any Club calendar. Whats worse is that Vb made it ffs.
 
Would be funny if Danger is only leaving because he's still fuming about the incompetence of our old administration and the sanctions they brought on the club

Well Paddy, guess who's waiting at Pick 1 in the Pre Season Draft for you.

View attachment 176743
BTW you should be red carded for putting a photo of Trigg on this forum ........Mods!!!!
 
The latter IMO.
He had a blinder against Carlton and he does something like that goal every so often.
He turns 24 next year too. That said, as a 190cm midfielder, who has played 60 games and has a lot of pace he could turn a corner very quickly. Also given that we suck in getting the ball out to him and Motlop etc perhaps he was a bit under-serviced.

Especially in a new environment there is good chance he will (and one that's desperate for outside runners).
 
Pick 16, on top of wherever we finish is still quite good, and should see a very talented kid come through in the draft.

Or give us currency to trade.

So, sorry, i don't see this risk you're stating?

It's accepting massive unders. Dangerfield is worth way more than 2015 pick 12 and 2016 pick 16.

I'd love to negotiate with some of you.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Well.... There it is...

Bit like watching a good movie but knowing the end. Satisfied but the shows over.

In a weird way this might help us clear the air and do a mini re-build and truly build Walshy's vision of 'Team First' with a group of 100% committed players.

A bit of top end draft cream would be nice to after a while :thumbsu:
 
This first option is my preferred, though everyone thinks it can't happen.

I would be happy with it and it's a quick win-win. I think if we prise a ruck from you guys we can almost make it stick with the AFL given that we gave 21 for Stanley last year.

Cats give: R1 and R2
Crows give: Danger and Reilly O'Brien

Cats get: Dangerfield and Reilly O'Brien
Crows get: Pick 9, 14, 28

Not the best ever deal but solid I guess?

Edit: Might have to shuffle some late picks too -
 
It's accepting massive unders. Dangerfield is worth way more than 2015 pick 12 and 2016 pick 16.

I'd love to negotiate with some of you.

You realize we're in the situation where no matter what happens, we'll be getting the raw end of the stick.

If we got out with two 1st rounders for Danger, i'd be content, even if they ended up being pick 12, and pick 18 because that's 2 talented kids in return and can go a long way to fixing our list.
 
I would be happy with it and it's a quick win-win. I think if we prise a ruck from you guys we can almost make it stick with the AFL given that we gave 21 for Stanley last year.

Cats give: R1 and R2
Crows give: Danger and Reilly O'Brien

Cats get: Dangerfield and Reilly O'Brien
Crows get: Pick 9, 14, 28

Not the best ever deal but solid I guess?

Must we give up O'Brien as well for the 1st and 2nd ;)

Like if you added 2016 first as well then i'd take it, but the kid is going to be an absolute gun.

You can have Lowden though...
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I would be happy with it and it's a quick win-win. I think if we prise a ruck from you guys we can almost make it stick with the AFL given that we gave 21 for Stanley last year.

Cats give: R1 and R2
Crows give: Danger and Reilly O'Brien

Cats get: Dangerfield and Reilly O'Brien
Crows get: Pick 9, 14, 28

Not the best ever deal but solid I guess?

Thing is that a lot of Crows players would be unhappy with that.

Realistically, if we could get an undertaking from GC they would take 14 and CEY for Bennel, I would do it.

Edit: Crows supporters, not players*
 
Must we give up O'Brien as well for the 1st and 2nd ;)

Like if you added 2016 first as well then i'd take it, but the kid is going to be an absolute gun.

You can have Lowden though...
Haha - whoever I don't really care - just so the AFL shut their cake holes.:D
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Oppo Camp Dangerfield's Gone (Zero tolerance to trolling) - READ THREAD LINKED IN OP BEFORE POSTING

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top