Question for the Qanon types still obsessed with Dan, he in prison yet, or charged with anything?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
had not been proposed by health experts, although they ultimately supported the move as a way to limit transmission of the virus.Shocked I tell you
Did they have a choice ?had not been proposed by health experts, although they ultimately supported the move as a way to limit transmission of the virus.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Unless there is evidence to the contrary I'm inclined to say yes.Did they have a choice ?
Do you remember the time Sutton publicly contradicted Dan on something and Dan shunned him?had not been proposed by health experts, although they ultimately supported the move as a way to limit transmission of the virus.
i'm sure that would upset them no end.I absolutely hate Andrews and his sidekick Jacinta
and you'd be spot on.Unless there is evidence to the contrary I'm inclined to say yes.
Did they have a choice ?
yes, they could have told him that it wouldn't be helpful and that it wouldn't workDid they have a choice ?
What would have happened if they didn't?
These days, I think it went on too long. Many jurisdictions made many mistakes, but the conspiracy theories are just bonkers.
Let's assume that's true.They would have been sacked like every other public servant who didn’t agree with a decision Dan made.
Let's assume that's true.
How many have come out NOW and said they did not agree, but were forced to agree under threat of losing their jobs?
Let's get some evidence on the table.
It doesn't say they didn't listen to the health advice. It says the measure was proposed by the government and ultimately supported by the health experts.I don’t even care about the curfew decision specifically, but rather that it demonstrates that the “We will always listen to the health advice” ethos that was clearly not completely true.
Then when you analyse all of the other variables selected, you can see why the Andrews’ government’s hyper-conservatism as left us in such a financial hole.
Of course if you criticised some of the measures in here and recommended some more sensible tweaks, you were labelled a “cooker” by many in here.
No I don't but that's not to say it didn't occur.Do you remember the time Sutton publicly contradicted Dan on something and Dan shunned him?
It doesn't say they didn't listen to the health advice. It says the measure was proposed by the government and ultimately supported by the health experts.
You’re not a Catholic in Northern Ireland.Dan the man should be thrown in the hoosegow! I along with thousands of other people lost their business, saw friendships and relationships falter, freedom ripped out from underneath them and innocent Victorian people in trouble with the law for just walking down the street! This power crazed premier destroyed lives at will.
Dan the man should be thrown in the hoosegow! I along with thousands of other people lost their business, saw friendships and relationships falter, freedom ripped out from underneath them and innocent Victorian people in trouble with the law for just walking down the street! This power crazed premier destroyed lives at will.
Dan the man should be thrown in the hoosegow! I along with thousands of other people lost their business, saw friendships and relationships falter, freedom ripped out from underneath them and innocent Victorian people in trouble with the law for just walking down the street! This power crazed premier destroyed lives at will.