Remove this Banner Ad

Dawes for Warnock.....Thoughts ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greeney
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

He's a decent tap ruckman, but has less physical presence and impact around the ground than Wood.

Think about that for a second.

Less physical presence and impact than Wood.

I'm not quite getting your point, are you saying that Warnock is about as useful as a handful of sawdust in a classroom full of 5 year olds, milk and coke?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

We already have one Cam Wood, we don't need another. There would be slim chance of going after him if we hadn't already signed Lynch.
 
Thoughts? Surely if we are dredging these depths it is time to develop one of our own for a change. Ceglar or Witts. Additionally, Warnock offers us little we don't already have on our list in Wood. Why give up anything? We could just retain Wood. To give up Dawes for Warnock would be tragedy. No jokes.
 
Think Warnock is actually a very good tap ruckman.

Still, don't want to give them any type of leg-up, no matter how slender.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

GOD NO!!!! He is not going to Carlton the club won't dare trade him to Carlton. There is no way we can give away a loyal Collingwood man who took unders to stay with us to Carlton. I never want to see Collingwood trade with Carlton again. EVER!

If we give him for Warnock and swap our first two rounders around, I would be so filthy I don't know what I would do, I don't want to imagine it because it's not going to happen.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom