Don't they call those people share traders?
No, no they don't. Mainly because that's a completely different thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't they call those people share traders?
As a counselor, i'm sure theres a code of ethics/confidentiality etc. she must abide by.
I've done some work with Wayne, he is a very good man.That's correct....if only she was registered. Confidentiality is not just about names but also content. It is the reason the AFLPA are angry as she has broken confidentiality in regards to what was said in the sessions.
I also don't buy the crap that she is trying to bring it to a head. There are so many more appropriate ways to do it than run to the press. If Wayne Schwass is disappointed with her (and he does great work in the area of metal health and player welfare) then you know to laugh off the HS driven painting of the AFLPA as the bad guys here. She has broken confidentiality in a major way.
That's correct....if only she was registered. Confidentiality is not just about names but also content. It is the reason the AFLPA are angry as she has broken confidentiality in regards to what was said in the sessions.
I also don't buy the crap that she is trying to bring it to a head. There are so many more appropriate ways to do it than run to the press. If Wayne Schwass is disappointed with her (and he does great work in the area of metal health and player welfare) then you know to laugh off the HS driven painting of the AFLPA as the bad guys here. She has broken confidentiality in a major way.
And if you are a decent gambler the betting agencies ban you anyway. My mate at work has been blacklisted by 3 agencies because he wins too much off them....
The only link with Beams is her name, simply by coincidence.There were rumours of circling of Beams having a gambling issue, so they press went with the story. The Herald Sun basically ran a free ad for her business in exchange for some info that may have been fictional, and definitely should have been confidential if true. The paper and her are as dodgy as they come.
The only link with Beams is her name, simply by coincidence.
The rumour of the players involvement stems from that coincidence.
I am suggesting the rumours about Beams stem from the coincidental name of the Jan Beams in the issue. That Beams the player has no gambling problem at all and that long bows were drawn.I'm suggesting that they ran with a dodgily sourced and un-verified story (a lot was said about the AFLPA without them even being asked for a quote) because of the rumours about Beams.
The rumours about Beams began before the article was written or read.I am suggesting the rumours about Beams stem from the coincidental name of the Jan Beams in the issue. That Beams the player has no gambling problem at all and that long bows were drawn.
Not so sure about that.The rumours about Beams began before the article was written or read.
The Beams rumours were around well before that article. I received messages about it (which I do not believe) in May.Not so sure about that.
I am specifically talking about the $1million dollar payment by Ed.The Beams rumours were around well before that article. I received messages about it (which I do not believe) in May.
That was the ridiculous rumour I was messaged about back in May. If clowns like us hear about it, you can guarantee Ken Wood would have heard about it, and if it was true, it would be the biggest story in town. Because we would have breached our salary cap and be in big tsuris.I am specifically talking about the $1million dollar payment by Ed.
If Beams wants to gamble it's his decision. He is an adult and gambling is legal.
The rumours about Beams began before the article was written or read.
Long bows haven't worked since AgincourtI am suggesting the rumours about Beams stem from the coincidental name of the Jan Beams in the issue. That Beams the player has no gambling problem at all and that long bows were drawn.
James Packer still works. Does he need to?He wins too much, but still works a job....
James Packer still works. Does he need to?
DirectorWhat's his job called?
Nice work if you can get itDirector
Director
Not sure why you care so muchThere is a clear definition that board members are not considered employees, they are considered a governing body...
I think you might find he stepped down from those roles in 2018...
I don’t have Instagram. But I bet the knob has privatised it or deleted it for now.AFL 2019: Dayne Beams calls out Instagram troll
‘Why should players just have to put up with this sh**?’www.foxsports.com.au