Autopsy DELIRIUM

[hilly]

Damn this has me thinking. Does this change everything? I was convinced since the gws game the greens have been instructed to gift protected species and clubs….especially after the 4 quarter inconsistencies. Why wouldn’t they play that on then?

May have been a riot.

 

[Rod Stroker]

we got away with one. Larks or PC should have just rushed it over the line

 

[DuckYeah]

we got away with one. Larks or PC should have just rushed it over the line

View attachment 2621641

Did they discuss the other 15 that were paid and werent paid in that game?

 

[Jonnoo]

You see so many advantages paid where the gifted team end up screwing it up. We got a bit lucky for sure.

 

[choppy]

I think the umpire didn’t see Larkey grab the ball.

However, it was play on advantage all day and it was a shit go from the skipper being a selfish campaigner. Not Pc’s fault, he knew Larkey took advantage and tried to fix the mistake.

On a day full of umpiring howlers that didn’t go our way, it’s justification

Bullshit

Umpires havent paid advantage for 3 years when a player has taken the advantage and not got a goal.

Calling Larkey a shit campaigner in this case is a shit take.

Grow up

 

[choppy]

You see so many advantages paid where the gifted team end up screwing it up. We got a bit lucky for sure.

Bullshit they havnt paid advantage for 3 years in that event

 

[Jonnoo]

Bullshit they havnt paid advantage for 3 years in that event

Haha there’s been heaps, not necessarily shots for goal but plenty around the ground

 

[choppy]

Other than picking it up and attempting a kick and fluffed it. Its advantage. Its not even debatable

Have you not watched any AFL game in the last 3 years. It was a continuous part of the play, their was no pause , 99 times out 100 th3 u pure will not call advantage in this scenario.

To us3 to have a shit take on our captain is a shit take

 

[DuckYeah]

Have you not watched any AFL game in the last 3 years. It was a continuous part of the play, their was no pause , 99 times out 100 th3 u pure will not call advantage in this scenario.

To us3 to have a shit take on our captain is a shit take

Lol an umpire was on 360 and said its advantage. The rules says so. Its advantage. FMD. It was a bad umpiring decision, as were about 15 other howlers in that game.

Anyway, its done now who gives a shit. Larkey almost cost us but didn’t in the end and we can laugh about it

 

[choppy]

Haha there’s been heaps, not necessarily shots for goal but plenty around the ground

Shots for goal is the pertinent point, 99 out 100 they will call that back. If Larkey had kicked the goal the umpire may have called it back but because he didnt it was always going to be called back.

This discussion is just to have a go at Larkey.

Its a shit take,

He was the first one to sign long term and then LDU , Zurhar which provided the nucleas dor all our young players to reseign.

Yes he is going thru a lean patch, is clearly carrying an injury.

But to carry on like this is bullshit.He takes the best defender every week, frees up Darling Trembath Curtis Dursma Zurhar .

 

[Jonnoo]

Shots for goal is the pertinent point, 99 out 100 they will call that back. If Larkey had kicked the goal the umpire may have called it back but because he didnt it was always going to be called back.

This discussion is just to have a go at Larkey.

Its a shit take,

He was the first one to sign long term and then LDU , Zurhar which provided the nucleas dor all our young players to reseign.

Yes he is going thru a lean patch, is clearly carrying an injury.

But to carry on like this is bullshit.He takes the best defender every week, frees up Darling Trembath Curtis Dursma Zurhar .

Not once did I have a go at Larks. Stop pearl clutching

 

[7577969923]

Not once did I have a go at Larks. Stop pearl clutching

Yeah. He wasn't referring to you.

 

[DuckYeah]

Yeah. He wasn't referring to you.

I called Larkey a selfish campaigner, not a shit campaigner… Nick “joe the goose” Larkey

 

[7577969923]

I called Larkey a selfish campaigner, not a shit campaigner… Nick “joe the goose” Larkey

Not my argument. Just pointing out that Jonoo's complaint was a little misguided.

 

[choppy]

Yeah we got lucky. That and Larkey's handball, bloody hell he's blessed he didn't cost us.

Cost the 30 seconds he would have taken for the shot and left 15 seconds at the final ballup instead of the 45 seconds?

That centre clearence that GC got and within 15 seconds the ball was inside 50 for GC

Yes the handball to Spargo missed, after the bloke has busted his arse for 120 minutes, but one could make an argument that playing on quickly gave the opportunity to go for the win.

Or one could take the opposite position and hang shit on our captain.

 

[R00StaR]

Cost the 30 seconds he would have taken for the shot and left 15 seconds at the final ballup instead of the 45 seconds?

That centre clearence that GC got and within 15 seconds the ball was inside 50 for GC

Yes the handball to Spargo missed, after the bloke has busted his arse for 120 minutes, but one could make an argument that playing on quickly gave the opportunity to go for the win.

Or one could take the opposite position and hang shit on our captain.

Im not bagging him for playing on in either case. The last goal shouldve been play on as i said.

Im bagging the 2 obvious massive skill errors that could've cost us.

Ive said it before and ill say it again, i want all our players to be successful. Im not hoping Larkey fails, but skill errors of that magnitude while in form slump deserve discussion and being pointed out.

This is blowjob mode i spoke about earlier. We win and we cant talk about out of form players or fkups. Lose by 1pt and we cant talk about positives. I dont do that, ill speak my mind whenever i want, if thats ok with you? lol im not really asking btw

 

[amaz199]

To me, the right decision was paid because the umpires would've known there were seconds left and the noise would've been a factor. They've been known to stop play and not pay advantage in those situations where there is too much chaos UNLESS the player has full control of the ball.

In this instance, correct decision despite whatever gets reported. The rules are interpreted differently all the time due to 'common sense'.

 

[Jonnoo]

Not my argument. Just pointing out that Jonoo's complaint was a little misguided.

Only bc he quoted me and not DY, anyway, we won and I just finished a ripper dinner cruise in Bangkok

 

[7577969923]

Only bc he quoted me and not DY, anyway, we won and I just finished a ripper dinner cruise in Bangkok

Nice! Was in Bangkok last year. Great city.

 

[hilly]

Lol an umpire was on 360 and said its advantage. The rules says so. Its advantage. FMD. It was a bad umpiring decision, as were about 15 other howlers in that game.

Anyway, its done now who gives a shit. Larkey almost cost us but didn’t in the end and we can laugh about it

Four umpires had no issue with Mac Andrew throwing the ball or Matt Rowell taking on tacklers with no consequence.

 

[Only Forwards]

umpire was on 360 and said its advantage.

Was this Ray Chamberlain?

If so his opinions on umpiring went totally out the window when he said he’d have paid a trip against Wardlaw when he tackled Heeney. Calling a trip when the tackler has a fist full of shorts. Absurd, mental gymnastics because the wrong call was made.

He’s an A grade f***wit who has a media slot because his ego was bigger than the role he used to play.

 

[tazaa]

Thats just not how its paid/interpreted any longer. Its deemed if a player picks the ball up and tries to play on whether its advantageous or not, its paid advantage. Under the way its been called for about the last 5 years, Larkey played on and took advantage.

View attachment 2621523

But thats the thing. The ump didnt signal advantage because Larkey didn't have possession of the ball until he got to the goal line.
By then his opponent was hot on his tail and he fresh aired it. There was no goal scored so you call it back.

The reasonable time clause simply expired. The ump was actually more concerned with setting the mark and starting the 30 seconds for Zurhaar than what the 2 clowns in Larkey and Curtis were doing behind him.

If Larkey had kicked the goal I genuinely believe he would have called it back and disallowed it.

 

[Only Forwards]

But thats the thing. The ump didnt signal advantage because Larkey didn't have possession of the ball until he got to the goal line.
By then his opponent was hot on his tail and he fresh aired it. There was no goal scored so you call it back.

The reasonable time clause simply expired. The ump was actually was more concerned with setting the mark and starting the 30 seconds for Zurhaar than what the 2 clowns in Larkey and Curtis were doing behind him.

Bang on. Far too much attention being paid to Larkey and not enough to the umpire, who at no point looks like he’s going to do anything other than set the mark.

 

[RooStu15]

if you watch the Inside Access the club released, Souv says to CD that he didn't hear the whistle, still doesn't excuse the cluster between him and PC but to call him selfish is way off the mark

 

[speedy]

if you watch the Inside Access the club released, Souv says to CD that he didn't hear the whistle, still doesn't excuse the cluster between him and PC but to call him selfish is way off the mark

Beat me to it. Yes it still was a cluster **** moment.