Didak or O'keefe

[Les Grossman]

Didak is pretty much off the market now but come trade week who would be the better option? Both quality small/medium forwards.

O'keefe for me.

 

[ClarkeM]

Didak for sure.

 

[lion4life]

O,keefe easily

 

[iGNITER]

Didak in a no-brainer

 

[ClarkeM]

O,keefe easily

O,K l4l,

Leading the league in kicks until after round 21 is something truly astonishing. After being suspended, he managed to still hold the record until round 21 and O'Keefe was not even close.

As iGNITOR said, Didak in a no-brainer

 

[bunsen burner]

Didak.

 

[SELFCONFESDAFLNERD]

O,K l4l,

Leading the league in kicks until after round 21 is something truly astonishing. After being suspended, he managed to still hold the record until round 21 and O'Keefe was not even close.

As iGNITOR said, Didak in a no-brainer

yeah but thats cause didak had the best kick to handball ratio of anyone in the league(anyone that played about 5 games or more anyway), think i would pick Didak,JUST. The opposite goes for Dan Cross, he was hardly in the top 10 posession getters all year but he was first in handballs for at least 3 quarters of the year

 

[hellfire]

yeah but thats cause didak had the best kick to handball ratio of anyone in the league(anyone that played about 5 games or more anyway), think i would pick Didak,JUST. The opposite goes for Dan Cross, he was hardly in the top 10 posession getters all year but he was first in handballs for at least 3 quarters of the year

Yes. But kicks are damaging - they actually do something rather than moving the ball to someone 3 inches away, particularly when coming from Didak. I'd rather 10 Didak kicks than 20 dinky handballs from anyone. The reason it's a big deal for him to be leading kicks is because he is so damaging by foot, and in the age of the handball, he is an exception.

 

[BacharHouli_43]

Didak by a mile. In terms of who is the better player for next season only, i would still have didak over okeefe by a distance. Okeefe is a lead up half forward and wont have much left in terms of quality seasons but didak is sublime in what he does.

 

[brettman135]

i'd like didak

 

[Carlton_Blues]

Considering Didak is not available, and O'Keefe may be a straight swap for Lovett, this whole post now becomes a moot point.

 

[Jatz]

o'keefe
only cos he's not always in shi*

 

[Upgrayedd]

Didak ONLY on age

Then again O'keefe is less likely to bring unwanted media attention to your club.

 

[flash2]

Probably a bit biased here but I'd take Didak a fair way ahead of O'Keefe. Didak can break open games and he has more falir to his game than O'Keefe in my opinion. Both are very good players but play different roles for their team.

 

[jakson68]

Both very good players but Didak is more damaging and can do the freakish things that can change a game and lift a team. O'Keefe is a star and very reliable but if I had to pick one it would be Didak, just on class.

 

[jerry springer]

Didak is a match winner

 

[The King!]

different player

didak hurts you more on the scoreboard though

 

[scotty4]

didak would be worth more because hes younger

 

[DoubleO7]

Didak