- Joined
- Oct 3, 2012
- Posts
- 13,223
- Reaction score
- 26,069
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- #26
Hardwick has only been coaching for 3 years so why does the last 15 matter? There is only something like 15 players left from pre-Hardwick anyway and since Hardwick has been here we have got f**ked in the draft by Gold Coast and GWS.Hird and by a fair way as well. Essendon have pretty ordinary list lacking in top end draft talent yet have managed to do way more than Richmond in recent years who have been harvesting blue chip picks for the last 15 years.





. Anyway I'm not saying Hardwick has done a bad job or anything. I'm just saying Hird has overachieved given the players at his disposal. Having said that it's difficult to compare because I think they're both coaching for different objectives and what I mean by that is that Hardwick has the talent and potential at his disposal to be really aiming to win or get very close to winning a premiership in the next 3-4 years. In contrast, with the players available and their more limited scope for potential, Hird is really coaching for his side to make the 8. I highly doubt we are going to see Essendon improve in the next few years to even be top four let alone a legitimate contender. The flip side of this is that Essendon's goal is more immediate and that's why they've had better results under Hird. Whereas Hardwick is working for something more long term and ultimately way more valuable so he deserves more time to attain that goal before being judged.