Remove this Banner Ad

Does Peter Jackson have a will?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyclops
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Cyclops

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 25, 2001
Posts
17,929
Reaction score
16,107
Location
Northern Suburbs
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
IOM Gyms, Preston Nth End
What happens to the Lord of the Rings movies if Peter Jackson pops off before they're all done? Will they do a Stanley Kubrik? Who would take over? Here's my worst case scenario.

Jackson is killed in a bizarre orc-related incident in November 2002. Speilberg takes over and decides there aren't enough chase scenes in the Two Towers, so he includes a sequence where Merry and Pippin find a magic carpet and are pursued by the Nazgul. The chase sequence is to be reprised in the third film, but fate intervenes...

Before post editing is complete Speilberg is decapitated by a crazed Ent, and the direction role falls to Disney studios. They develop the kids angle by including a small dog called Fluffy whose unsuspected magic powers play a major role in the battle of the Hornburg.

The entire Disney team is wiped out in a devasting comet strike, and George Lucas weighs in. All female characters are rescripted and dubbed with voices sampled from McDonalds counter staff; the first two episodes are re-edited to include a digitally inserted Jabba the Hutt; Gandalf is shrunk to 1/6th size and tinted green, and equipped with a glowing retractible sword.

However halfway through The return of the King Lucas chokes on his lembas, and John Woo takes over. The Rohirrim are dressed as Ninjas, and the seige of Minas Tirith now includes and extensive unarmed combat scene between Denethor (played by Jackie Chan) and the "Tenth Nazgul", complete with wirefighting, treewalking and extremely bad dubbing.

A succesful court challenge sees Woo replaced by a ressurected Peter Greenaway, who discards the script altogether and closes the film with Frodo conducting a marriage between Sam and Gollum, while the rest of the Fellowship wallows in a vat of chocolate and pig entrails.
 
Funny post. I enjoyed reading it, but the LOTR films are done. They're just releasing them in one year increments.

Now if Lucas bought the farm and couldn't finish Star Wars 3/6, you know what would happen? Dan26, and some guy calling himself 'SuperJedi' on a Natalie Portman love site would be savagely disappointed. Other than that...nothing much.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by Mooster7
Funny post. I enjoyed reading it, but the LOTR films are done. They're just releasing them in one year increments.

Yeah that's what I thought.
 
Originally posted by Cyclops
Ummm I think they're not done. Isn't there a monstrous amount of post production, computer animation etc still going on?

Post production is still going on. All the principle shooting has been done, just the effects, etc are still being worked on.
 
Originally posted by thehardaway


Post production is still going on. All the principle shooting has been done, just the effects, etc are still being worked on.

And apparently a fair amount of reshoots. Don't worry, if Jackson bought it, there's plenty of room to bastardize LotR
 
Originally posted by Mooster7

Now if Lucas bought the farm and couldn't finish Star Wars 3/6, you know what would happen? Dan26, and some guy calling himself 'SuperJedi' on a Natalie Portman love site would be savagely disappointed. Other than that...nothing much.

If Lucas doesn't finish Epsidoe III, I'll feel as if Essendon lost the Grand Final by one point. I live for Episode III. LOTR is good, but Star Wars is forever.
 
Originally posted by Dan26


If Lucas doesn't finish Epsidoe III, I'll feel as if Essendon lost the Grand Final by one point. I live for Episode III. LOTR is good, but Star Wars is forever.

I would actually prefer George Lucas NOT to direct Ep. III.

Gotta love the guy, but he cannot be trusted. ;)
 
Originally posted by Dan26


If Lucas doesn't finish Epsidoe III, I'll feel as if Essendon lost the Grand Final by one point. I live for Episode III. LOTR is good, but Star Wars is forever.

Yup, I knew you would be disappointed, Dan. You know, I saw Lucas on TV just a couple of days ago. He's not looking too good....;)
 
Originally posted by clucas91


I would actually prefer George Lucas NOT to direct Ep. III.

Gotta love the guy, but he cannot be trusted. ;)

It doesn't matter who directs. George was so hands-on as Executive producer for Empire and Jedi in 1980 and 1983 that he basically directed anwyay, even though Irwin Kerschner and Richard Marquand were the designated directors. George always does it his way, because these movies are his babies.

I trust he will do a great job with III like he did with II. This is the Episode where it all comes together - it's pay-off time. He knows what the audience wants after Epsidoe I, and he won't disappoint.

You could just about put Lucas' hairy ass on the screen for two hours and call it Episode III and it would rake in $400 million dollars. I seriously can't think of a more anticipated movie.
 
Originally posted by Dan26
George was so hands-on as Executive producer for Empire and Jedi in 1980 and 1983 that he basically directed anwyay,

George is an excellent writer and producer but it is his directing that gets me...I mean, Empire and ROTJ were so much more dramatic. Could you imagine Han being lowered into the carbonite chamber all the while we have Jar-Jar Binks tripping on things in the background? It's all about tension and drama...that is what gave Star Wars the appeal it has. George can't handle that, whereas Marquand and Kerschner captured it wonderfully.

Marquand actually didn't want Ewoks or a second Death Star BTW.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by clucas91


George is an excellent writer and producer but it is his directing that gets me...I mean, Empire and ROTJ were so much more dramatic. Could you imagine Han being lowered into the carbonite chamber all the while we have Jar-Jar Binks tripping on things in the background? It's all about tension and drama...that is what gave Star Wars the appeal it has. George can't handle that, whereas Marquand and Kerschner captured it wonderfully.

Marquand actually didn't want Ewoks or a second Death Star BTW.

You're pigeon holing Lucs by using Jar-Jar examples. Whta about the direction where Anakin slaughters the sand people, and then confesses to Padme? There was tons of tension and drama in Epsiode II (which Lucas directed), just as there was in the middle instalment of the original trilogy. Imagine what we will see in 2005!

George knows what he is doing.
 
Originally posted by Docker_Brat


Yep, exploiting every marketing opportunity to make millions out of suckers.

:D :D

My MSN sig yesterday, George Luca$, $tar War$, Jar-Jar Bink$, $kywalker. $amuel L. Jack$on.
 
Originally posted by Docker_Brat


Yep, exploiting every marketing opportunity to make millions out of suckers.

I reckon that is a myth. The movies themselves have made money due to the mythical qualities and timelessness. The merchandising was only considered after the first movie was successful. You'd be stupid not to take advanatge oif it if there was a market for it (which there is.) But the movies and the story have always come first. Everything else is an off-shoot.

If you make a movie for toys first and story second, you will have a bomb. The story and movies have always come first.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom