List Mgmt. Draft thread - 2025 (remaining picks: 29, 34)

[Keys]

Live draft hand
R1: 1 (Duursma), 4 (CDT), 19 (Lindsay)
R2: 29, 34
RD: 1

Draft picks pre-draft
R1: 1, 2, 13
R2: 34, 41
RD: 1

List spots available
Main list: 2 (includes Duursma, CDT, Lindsay)
Cat A Rookie list: 1 (expecting Robertson, Macrae and Schoenberg to join as SSP signings)
Cat B Rookie list: 1

Draft order

Spoiler

Draft prospect video highlights (thanks to noobermensch)

Rookie Me Central 2025 Draft Guide

2025 AFL Draft Guide

online.fliphtml5.com

Matthew Clarke on Gettable 17/11

Spoiler

Cal Twomey’s Phantom Draft

Spoiler

 

[Byron_Clanger]

HUN reporting that West Coast planning a draft bombshell with a bid on Harry Dean with pick 2.

A McGovern replacement. That would take all of pick 9 and push 11 to the second round. Failing that, Cavanagh reporting that Tigers will bid on him.

That could be an interesting discussion.

Blues - what price for 9? We like Harry a lot. So do Tigers.

Option 1.
Trade us 9 for 13 +33
Draft goes

1. Eagles Duursma
2. Suns match Uwland
3. Lions match Annables
4. Suns match Patterson
5. Eagles player xxx
6. Tigers bid on Dean - Blues need 90% of 1,659 =1,493

Option 2
No deal on 9

1. Eagles Duursma
2. Eagles bid on Dean - Blues need 90% of 2,481=2,233

Blues either match at 2 or 6. Difference is 740 points.


I like it

Wow, the first bit of meat-headdery the Eagles have engaged in, in like over a decade. I'm impressed.

 

[FKASC]

or our recruitment team genuinely rate him that highly

1. CDT
2. Dean
13. Farrow

 

[ep2018]

Looks like we're trying to force Carlton to trade for pick 2. Maybe we dont want CDT after all.

 

[amazingjoshy]

or our recruitment team genuinely rate him that highly

1. CDT
2. Dean
13. Farrow

The one thing you cant bag our recruiters for is being able to pick talls (inb4 someone brings up Brander)

If they rate Dean that highly Id back them in

Reckon its all posturing this far out to see what shakes loose though

 

[Altum Volantes]

The English migrant look?

I am not sure what they are trying to do but it is wide spread and unlikely to be something that is reflected upon in a positive way.

 

[CountryLad]

or our recruitment team genuinely rate him that highly

1. CDT
2. Dean
13. Farrow

If random260 doesn’t thumbs down this post I’m going to delete my account.

 

[pantskyle]

Looks like we're trying to force Carlton to trade for pick 2. Maybe we dont want CDT after all.

I think it's more we want to trade down from 13.

 

[ronpingwins]

I think it's more we want to trade down from 13.

How do you figure this?

 

[pantskyle]

How do you figure this?

It's fairly straightforward, we probably want pick 9. Threaten to go in at 2 and those picks are taken for that bid. Do a trade and we get the 3rd top ten pick we've wanted and Carlton don't have to worry too much about points.

 

[ronpingwins]

It's fairly straightforward, we probably want pick 9. Threaten to go in at 2 and those picks are taken for that bid. Do a trade and we get the 3rd top ten pick we've wanted and Carlton don't have to worry too much about points.

Ah, you said trade down from 13 I thought you meant us

 

[Ambrose Burnside]

Yeah I read "trade down" as us ending up with a worse pick than 13 and was so confused.

 

[pantskyle]

Suppose that's fair.

Fwiw even if we bid at 2 on Dean Carlton 100% match. So worst case it just brings out pick in anyway.

 

[BartBart]

Harry Dean at #2.

Nah, I'll believe it when I see it. We're trying to leverage a pick swap I think, as Asterix mentioned at option 1.

That's a "look... there's a bear" distraction

 

[ArdentEagle]

That's a "look... there's a bear" distraction

 

[dinnaz]

If he can just not get outmarked by oppo ruckmen that will be sufficient. He would more than make up for it once the ball hits the ground, idk if theres a single ruckman in the comp who seems to be as proficient as CDT at ground level.

I actually think his defensive pressure is quite poor. Like he has 1 effort to win it straight up and then zilch. It's not like he's busting tackles or anything. Usually a handball to nowhere which isn't really productive.

I'm more impressed with the outside the contest link up work.

 

[dispute]

Kevin Sheehan was talking up Sharp at our pick. Rates him as a top 3 pick in the open pool.

 

[AsterixTheGaul]

Mike Sheehan was talking up Sharp at our pick. Rates him as a top 3 pick in the open pool.

Mike Sheehan Is a reporter not a talent assessor. Even the HUN main reporters leave it to Cavanagh.

 

[archiemoses]

You realise there's an art to being able to pull off the Joe the goose move? You beat your opponent back to goal with your ability to read the game and being athletically superior - two extremely valuable traits imo.

Or you were too lazy to chase the defender who has run off you and got lucky.

 

[TheBudgies]

Feel like this gif has been used a dozen times already in regards to Cummings. If we draft him every second post for the rest of time will just be this gif.

Just wait for him to kick a goal on Debut.

 

[archiemoses]

BF board: "WC should bid on everyone and make everyone pay"

Article that WC might bid on Dean

BF board "Not him we might get stuck with him"

Pick 1 Patterson
Pick 2 Annabelle
Pick 3 Uwland
Pick 4 Dean

Carlton will match Dean at 4

 

[EagleMan87]

Just wait for him to kick a goal on Debut.

 

[amazingjoshy]

Mike Sheehan was talking up Sharp at our pick. Rates him as a top 3 pick in the open pool.

Mike or Kevin?

 

[PremiershipNo4]

BF board: "WC should bid on everyone and make everyone pay"

Article that WC might bid on Dean

BF board "Not him we might get stuck with him"

A few months ago it was just take Sharp at no 1 and anyone who thought any different was a tool.
God bless bigfooty.

 

[dispute]

Mike or Kevin?

Whoops I meant Kevin

 

[dispute]

Mike Sheehan Is a reporter not a talent assessor. Even the HUN main reporters leave it to Cavanagh.

Was actually Kevin, not sure why I said Mike