- Banned
- #276
hmm i use it all the time... eg. are we in agreeance??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
hmm i use it all the time... eg. are we in agreeance??
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
no way
its as bad as guesstimate haha, cant believe someone suggested it.
no way
its as bad as guesstimate haha, cant believe someone suggested it.
I consider myself fairly with it when it comes to the English language, but ever since MSN and texting (also, American forums and spell-checks don't help much) I've been making a ridiculous amount of errors. I'm always writing your and you're in place of each other, amongst other things. It's not that I don't know what goes where, it's just that my brain no longer seems to bother turning on when I'm on MSNAlso I type ridiculously fast so it's possible my brain just doesn't keep up...
quick question do you have a quick way of which is which out of quite or quiet?
i keep getting them mixed up, and had to look it up again today... and im sure ill forget in a few days lol.
you dont happen to have any "i before e, except after c", type deals?
haha,
well i'll have to think of something
how about this, the only difference between the words is that in quiet the 'e' is inside the word
and when you are inside, rather than outdoors, you must be quiet
you know - its strange enough to work lol
unbelievable snag, i was about to make fun of you for mispelling revived
and what do you know, revivified is an actual word, !!
As for foreign languages, I generally say 'sehr' instead of 'very' and 'danke' instead of 'thank you' just because they roll off the tongue easier.
Two things that have improved my spelling.
1. Read read read. Books make you smartererer
2. For the last three years I have forced myself to manually correct all spell check errors as I type an essay. So if I see that red squiggly line I don't right click and get the PC to fix it, I bodge around with the word until I get it right. After enough correcting of the same word, I tend to learn it gooder (man I'm gonna get in trouble for spelling gooder with two o's)
I think this depends on what kind of learner you are. If you don't internalise from reading, or if you are a more practical/manual learner, then you're less likely to pick up spelling from reading.I really like 2, but I'm not sure about 1.
At least, I'm not sure that reading 5 books a week is any better than reading 1 book a week. Some reading is obviously mandatory, but I've known plenty of avid readers who couldn't spell a lick.
I think this depends on what kind of learner you are. If you don't internalise from reading, or if you are a more practical/manual learner, then you're less likely to pick up spelling from reading.
But I have always (not to toot my own horn) been an immaculate speller, even from a very early age, and I've always attributed that to the early age that I started reading. In fact, I even learned never to start a sentence, let alone a paragraph, with the word "but"
To be serious though, I am sometimes amazed at the poor level of people's writing when they are reasonably avid readers. Even at uni for the last few years, I've noticed amongst a group of students doing a Bachelor of Communication, that many still make errors in the fundamentals of spelling and grammar, which I find incredible.
I'm not surprised any more, but I despair when sub-editors (spelt with or without the hyphen) panic when they see a comma.And just don't try slipping in a quote from Yeats, for example - they'll not only fail to recognise it, they'll reword it to make it 'clearer'.
![]()