Absolute shocker, umpires shouldn't be giving those ones out, barely grazing leg stump
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Open both eyesAbsolute shocker, umpires shouldn't be giving those ones out, barely grazing leg stump
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
... is this something people are going to have to talk about?
Umpiring this series has not been good, and it's affected the player's confidence in the umpires.
Day 2 of the test series: Holder has to challenge 3 LBW's, all went against him. His batsman have to challenge 2, both were given out and overturned on review. Today, England have had how many 'Umpire's call' LBW's go in their favour, with one against. The one against hit a batsman who had stepped across their stumps, hit in front of middle after shooting low, and was cannoning into leg whatever Hawkeye said.Nothing wrong with umpires giving the batsman not out when Hawkeye has it barely clipping the top of the bails. With margin of error that could be completely missing
Any obvious errors not overturned are because players stupidly burn reviews on balls missing by a mile.
But the umpires deserve some benefit, they’ve had a fair enforced break. Just look at how sh*t the AFL standard is with an unusual break!
Day 2 of the test series: Holder has to challenge 3 LBW's, all went against him. His batsman have to challenge 2, both were given out and overturned on review. Today, England have had how many 'Umpire's call' LBW's go in their favour, with one against. The one against hit a batsman who had stepped across their stumps, hit in front of middle after shooting low, and was cannoning into leg whatever Hawkeye said.
At what point do we talk about the fact that the change of emphasis from umpires making incorrect decisions to captains making bad reviews has placed the scrutiny away from where it should be? Captains are paid to manufacture tactics; they are not paid to be better umpires than the umpires.
Trusting the umpires to get it right has not worked for the Windies this series, at all. Why should they?
Problem is no DRS at any other level of cricket so you have to learn on the goPost of the year.
I have said for a long time that drs and shitty umpiring in general has forced players to add a new skill - umpiring. They shouldn’t have to.
Absolute shocker, umpires shouldn't be giving those ones out, barely grazing leg stump
Been average from what Ive seen... is this something people are going to have to talk about?
Umpiring this series has not been good, and it's affected the player's confidence in the umpires.
Yeah, if Windies can scrap a patient 250+ total with the rain forecast today, they're probably in a good position to retain the Trophy.England on top obviously but not nearly as on top as they should be
Where does Stokes sit in the "best ever all-rounders" list?
Not purely on stats, but in the concept of his value to his team......
I haven't seen much of Dowrich before so don't know his history, but he looks very uneasy behind the stumps with messy glovework. Is he just struggling in English conditions?
He looks steady enough batting and his average is certainly fine enough for a keeper but it doesn't seem to be at a level that he's picked because of it. Is anyone else competing for the Windies keeper spot?