- Joined
- Apr 13, 2008
- Posts
- 23,736
- Reaction score
- 33,145
- Location
- So Frang
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- The Anti-Theists
Did you get hard typing that?.not with prick shithouse as coach anyway.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Did you get hard typing that?.not with prick shithouse as coach anyway.

and there is nothing good about barracking for carlscumI don't know what you're implying but Mick's sausages would be the only good thing about barracking for Carlton.
There is one thing good about it, your not barracking for Essendonand there is nothing good about barracking for carlscum
not with prick shithouse as coach anyway.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
There is one thing good about it, your not barracking for Essendon![]()
You're the one keeps mentioning Micks sausage!.no not at all-but you get hard thinking about mick's sausage!
Pisser

"It's always something sneaky with James, he's always got something up his sleeve"
I'm not generally a fan of Sam Newman's style. Each to their own. But I liken him to where Thom Yorke sits in the world of music. Sam's years of media mastery and standing with the general footy fan allows him to transcend the bottom-feeders of the media, with no personality, who rely on their master, the AFL, to give them oxygen. Thom Yorke has transcended the mundanity of mainstream music to be able to create in his own way, without fear of failure. Thankfully, Sam is his own man in the media and can tell it how it is, in his own creative way. Kudos to him... and Thom...
If Hird wanted to scare a few people he could subpoena Big Internet (or whatever its called) for IP addresses of various posters, even if he had no intention of actually suing them I imagine a few individuals would pipe down real quick.
Happy new year!
Pretentious ******y over a couple of pretentious ******s.

Really?One of the great sources of inspiration for this thread has been permabanned.
RIP rhymes with pines.
Carlscum could have Baby Jesus as coach and still would not win with their present list.
I am the lawroyals1922 will bein mourning rejoicing in mourning rejoicingoh I don't know

we've always been at war with eastasiaView attachment 101107
Clearly been removed completely. All evidence deleted. Typical of those in power there, will be trying to rewrite history when the inevitable happens.
In the early days, expressing some doubts about hird was reasonable and understandable. Now that we know a lot more, i believe anyone slandering Hird should get a permanent ban. Anyone defending him is following the rule of logic and the law. I never saw her posts, but if she was banned for being personally abusive towards people slandering a man who who has been illegally vilified, then it seems the world has gone mad. Why is okay to attack Hird on HTB, but not okay to attack manifestly abusive posters? The logic i guess is that Hird is not a presence here so is not directly affected by personal attacks. Scratch the surface of that statement though and as others have noted, defamation online is a prosecutable offence. Why? Because it materially damages a persons reputation whether they see it or not!
At the end of the day, the forum contains all sorts of attacks on just about everybody in the AFL, so banning people who do that is unrealistic. Far easier to ban an individual caught on the wrong side of the equation. As a result we have a forum full of people free to stand on their soap box slandering everyone under the sun except other posters. It's not a good thing, it's not a fair thing, but it is what it is.