Remove this Banner Ad

Fletch Gets 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smokin_Joe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

What a joke.....should have just king hit him 100 metres off the ball.....thats a two week sentence! :mad:
 
That's bullshyte, players are allowed to kick our players & don't even get reported, yet that was soft as & shouldn't have been reported, ****ing media. :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

That is absoulte cr*p! How can Holland only get 2!
The Tribunal are a absouloute disgrace!

Also I have just read
Collingood Magpies now known as Collingwood Koalas!
 
Originally posted by GoSainters10
That is absoulte cr*p! How can Holland only get 2!
The Tribunal are a absouloute disgrace!

Also I have just read
Collingood Magpies now known as Collingwood Koalas!

*Violen quietly plays*

Go back to your holiday.
 
2 weeks, nice job Ed. Covering all bases just in case.

What a ******* joke. I'm emailing the club to demand they appeal. Take it to court. I don't care - this is a disgrace. Even the umpire thought he should have got off ffs.
 
Originally posted by Darealrath
2 weeks, nice job Ed. Covering all bases just in case.


Haha!
Oh yes, blame Eddie.

God you people. :rolleyes:

You could see 2 weeks coming a mile away. His appaling record alone would be the death of him whether he deserved it or not.

For the record, I though he didn't, but you just know the way they work.
 
Originally posted by Darealrath
2 weeks, nice job Ed. Covering all bases just in case.

What a ******* joke. I'm emailing the club to demand they appeal. Take it to court. I don't care - this is a disgrace. Even the umpire thought he should have got off ffs.

Its not ED its F***en C unt Lyon and his Sunday Footy Show.
 
If Notting gets 1 for his then Fletcher had to get 2. Jarrad Waite got 2 for stuff all earlier in the year too. Can't compare the suspensions to Brodie Holland, everyone that doesn't wear black and white and some that do know that Brodie was let off extremely lightly.

I would imagine coming into and during finals, two weeks is the most that the tribunal will give but they are also too scared about these sort of comparisons to let anyone off altogether. Spineless bunch of fools that they are. Time to set some proper gradings for offenses so we know what is what.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by mantis
That's bullshyte, players are allowed to kick our players & don't even get reported, yet that was soft as & shouldn't have been reported, ****ing media. :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

I disagree. He left the ground and collected Hayden with a forearm to the face. Its not like his shoulder was tucked in either...his arm was a mile away from his body. Thats a textbook charge/strike and ALWAYS gets matches. When you leave the ground then your done for. That added with Fletchers pathetic tribunal record - 11 times in 10 years hes been reported for just about everything under the sun other than time wasting, then he was almost certainly gonna get weeks.

Instead of blasting the system, the tribunal, the umpires, the freo players....how bout someone get in Fletchers ear and say hey...this just isnt bloody good enough.
 
I hope the bomber players are angry.

Coz i want them to ****en use that anger at the ball against port.

brodie gets the same time even though he punched a bloke straight in the face 50 metres off the ball.

I HOPE WILL PLAY COLLINGWOOD NOW.

WERES THE ****EN CONSISTENCY TRIBUNAL !!!!

****EN ****ERS.
 
Also Baker got 3 weeks for giving Alesio a fairy kick! (lucky they appealed) Fraser got 1 for pushing Petrie over!
Milne got 3 weeks for giving scarlett a punch to the shoulder and got 2 weeks for making contact with McLeods shoulder!
CLearly a wrong decsion!
 
Originally posted by Smokin_Joe
WERES THE ****EN CONSISTENCY TRIBUNAL !!!!

Burgoyne got 2 in the first round for a similar thing.

Fletcher gets 2 for this.

Waite got 2.

Id say its pretty consistent.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by GoSainters10
I'm not saying he shouldn't of got 2 weeks but basing on the fact that Holland got 2 weeks he should have got off!

Holland pleaded guilty, was struck first and doesn't have a record like Fletcher's. FWIW I thought Fletcher should have only got 1 week.
 
Originally posted by The Old Dark Navy's
If Notting gets 1 for his then Fletcher had to get 2. Jarrad Waite got 2 for stuff all earlier in the year too. Can't compare the suspensions to Brodie Holland, everyone that doesn't wear black and white and some that do know that Brodie was let off extremely lightly.


Correct.

Two weeks was the correct punishment. Good to see that clumsiness is no longer an excuse.

(Brodie could have got perhaps an extra week, but to say he got off "extremely lightly" is an exagerration in the extreme.)
 
Originally posted by hotpie
Correct.

Two weeks was the correct punishment. Good to see that clumsiness is no longer an excuse.

(Brodie could have got perhaps an extra week, but to say he got off "extremely lightly" is an exagerration in the extreme.)

Bullsh.it! What Brodie got is criminal compared to what Fletcher got. How many do you think Fletcher would have got had he done the same thing as Brodie.....I reckon the would have given him 6
 
Originally posted by Kenno25
Holland pleaded guilty, was struck first
Firstly pleading guilty was a no-brainer, could hardly have denied it. Secondly, are you referring to that jumper/chest tap as being justification for Brodie's king hit?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom