Remove this Banner Ad

Religion Folau

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Nor I yours.
Lol
Yes because the British French and Catholic Church are the pillars of freedom and cultural colonialism.
👍
Leave aside the issue of colonisation for a moment, the Catholic Church is certainly the source of the principle of equity within our English based legal system; and its hierarchical superiority over the harshness of strict form based law. It's been the source of conscientious based conduct in a legal sense within our system. That's not an insignificant thing; no matter where you sit on matters of religion or politics.
 
They were both tweets is where any similarity ends. Yasmin did not post as a private person, Folau did. Yasmin posted a posted a horrible about returned soldiers, Folau quoted the bible. Folaus words were protected, Yasmin's weren't. Folau was sacked for his religious beleifs which is unlawful, Yasmin was not sacked because even though she admitted her post was hateful bigoted and inappropriate
Yassmin's tweets were perfectly fine and if nothing else showed how Anzac Day has become completely unrepresentative of the values it was originally meant to represent. Of course she gets hounded out of the country whilst Folau gets money thrown at him for being an actual bigot. It's what this country is all about these days.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad


Shocking news just in.

Conciliation talks fail.

Israel now claiming he is fighting for the “freedom” of all Australian’s.

Noble intentions if true....would be nobler still if he was fighting for it using his own coin. The prick.

#realbludger
 
Last edited:
Yassmin's tweets were perfectly fine and if nothing else showed how Anzac Day has become completely unrepresentative of the values it was originally meant to represent. Of course she gets hounded out of the country whilst Folau gets money thrown at him for being an actual bigot. It's what this country is all about these days.

Bit more to it than just that.

I’m not defending Folau’s crusade, but no one can challenge his love or loyalty toward this country.

Can we in good conscience say the same about Yasmin?
 
Bit more to it than just that.

I’m not defending Folau’s crusade, but no one can challenge his love or loyalty toward this country.

Can we in good conscience say the same about Yasmin?
Why couldn't we?
 
From reading this thread, it appears most here don't mind people being religious as long as they don't talk about it publicly.

Very "don't ask, don't tell". I thought we were past that as a society.
 
Why couldn't we?

Because let’s cut the crap.

Yasmin sneers at the idea of an Anglo Saxon/Celtic descendant Australia, and she sneers at white Australian’s - many of whose forebears built this country out of the dirt, and who fought and died for it.

She wilfully pisses on all of that.

The thousands of Australian men who died in the Great War and the impact that had on this nation, is not something for cultural Marxist’s to now stand and sneer at.

Second of all, her public commentary, and affiliation with the likes of Hizb Ut Tahir, also at the very least suggest she believes in some manner of Sharia Law being enacted in this country....whether that be alongside our existing legal system or as a replacement, I don’t care. You want that shit, I don’t want you in this country.

She is scum, and the sheer embodiment of the bastard union between Islamism and contempary Social Liberalism.
Plain and simple.
 
Last edited:
Because let’s cut the crap.

Yasmin sneers at the idea of an Anglo Saxon/Celtic descendant Australia, and she sneers at white Australian’s - many of whose forebears built this country out of the dirt, and who fought and died for it.

She wilfully pisses on all of that.

Her public commentary, and affiliation with the likes of Hizb Ut Tahir, also at the very least suggest she believes in some manner of Sharia Law being enacted in this country....whether that be alongside our existing legal system or as a replacement, I don’t care.

She is scum, and the sheer embodiment of the bastard union between Islamism and contempary Social Liberalism.

Plain and simple.

Lest we forget the ardent defenders against tyranny were MIA in this pitched free speech battle.
 
If truth be told, Folau wasn't sacked for quoting The Bible, his Bible quote didn't even mention homosexuals...

To be fair the word homosexual is a fairly new invention, it was coined some time in the late 1800s. Several versions of the Bible though now use the term in various verses to refer to behaviour that is disapproved by Christine doctrine because it can be inferred from what the verses are describing that it is indeed referring to what we currently label as homosexuality or at the very least homosexual acts.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Yasmin went against the ultimate in PC groupthink. Patriotism.

That’s the way a social justice warrior like you would see it.

Patriotism as a dirty word.

The rest of us simply see it as having pride in being born Australian, and pride in the things which have contributed to our young, independent, nation being what it is today.

And as I said...Yasmin pissed on all that.

And you celebrate her for it.

You make me sick.
 
To be fair the word homosexual is a fairly new invention, it was coined some time in the late 1800s. Several versions of the Bible though now use the term in various verses to refer to behaviour that is disapproved by Christine doctrine because it can be inferred from what the verses are describing that it is indeed referring to what we currently label as homosexuality or at the very least homosexual acts.

In Corinthians there is the mention of men having sex with men, but Folau did not use this particular Bible Quote to express his dislike of... I mean... religious beliefs. He quoted Galatians.

The image that he used (in some cases) is above a Bible reference Corinthians but this was cropped in Folau's post (for some reason). Additionally Corinthians does not include, for example, Lesbians and Atheists. And when investigating further, this image seems to have its origins in The United States of America and can, for example, be seen displayed outside of free thought conventions (in response to atheists).

It seems to be a list of people these particular people do not like, as evidenced by people who are not included on this list but could still be condemned to hell based on their actions cf those not allowed in The Bible, like Fox News, Conservative presidents, Envangelists, ergo, it is just a truncated list in comparison to;

repent.jpg
 
Nor I yours.
Lol
Yes because the British French and Catholic Church are the pillars of freedom and cultural colonialism.
👍

The Magna Carta. The Declaration of the Rights of Man. The English Bill of Rights. These are the stones that paved the path to all the freedoms you enjoy today. I’m sure you don’t value my opinion ... it’s based on historical fact.
 
Because let’s cut the crap.

Yasmin sneers at the idea of an Anglo Saxon/Celtic descendant Australia, and she sneers at white Australian’s - many of whose forebears built this country out of the dirt, and who fought and died for it.

She wilfully pisses on all of that.

The thousands of Australian men who died in the Great War and the impact that had on this nation, is not something for cultural Marxist’s to now stand and sneer at.

Second of all, her public commentary, and affiliation with the likes of Hizb Ut Tahir, also at the very least suggest she believes in some manner of Sharia Law being enacted in this country....whether that be alongside our existing legal system or as a replacement, I don’t care. You want that ****, I don’t want you in this country.

She is scum, and the sheer embodiment of the bastard union between Islamism and contempary Social Liberalism.
Plain and simple.
This post would be laughable if it weren't for the fact that some people believe this tripe. And those that do are far more of a threat to this country than anyone like Yassmin could ever be.
 
The Magna Carta. The Declaration of the Rights of Man. The English Bill of Rights. These are the stones that paved the path to [some of the] freedoms you enjoy today. ... it’s based on historical fact.
Correct
You can add the Court of Chancery to that list; which later developed into the Court of equity, and more recently into the law of equity.
 
Last edited:

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

more of a threat to this country than anyone like Yassmin could ever be.

Why?

Not even a minority of our number, harbour fantasies about blowing people up in the name of our beliefs.

We don’t wish to surplant our existing system of parliamentary democracy in favour of some medieval theocracy.

All we ask is live and let live, show respect and get respect.

Can Yasmin and her mob honestly say the same?
 
The Magna Carta. The Declaration of the Rights of Man. The English Bill of Rights. These are the stones that paved the path to all the freedoms you enjoy today. I’m sure you don’t value my opinion ... it’s based on historical fact.
Lol
Ask the indigenous people’s of the world and I’m sure they’d just lol right up in your face with me.👍
 
Why?

Not even a minority of our number, harbour fantasies about blowing people up in the name of our beliefs.

We don’t wish to surplant our existing system of parliamentary democracy in favour of some medieval theocracy.

Can her mob honestly say the same?
Her mob?
 
Lol
Ask the indigenous people’s of the world and I’m sure they’d just lol right up in your face with me.👍
The issue you've noted above, doesn't diminish the argument he's made about the source of a major portion of the freedoms in the society in which you live. No system is perfect.
 
The issue you've noted above, doesn't diminish the argument he's made about the source of a major portion of the freedoms in the society in which you live. No system is perfect.
The freedoms he talked about, are about as meaningful as the United Nations is for uniting the nations.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom