- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Posts
- 34,367
- Reaction score
- 57,682
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Ormond AFC
what you just said is the key difference between clarko and lyon, or lyon and the rest of the coaches i mentioned.
lyon has the philosophy that it has worked and almost got us there, so why change it? its a proven formula albeit it hasn't achieved the ultimate success
clarko and the other coaches i mentioned see the writing on the wall and where the game is moving too. they change it up and develop it, rather than trying to hang onto something that is now ineffective moving forward
for instance compare clarko to lyon after he won the flag in 2008. after a poor season in 2009, mainly ravaged by injury. just 12 months out from a grand final win, he didnt say well what i have works as we won a flag the year before, lets keep persisting with the game plan and program i have. no he identified that the competition had caught up to him and if he stayed on the current path they would fall further behind. so he re-jigged everything. hawthorn of 2008 was completely different in their approach to hawthorn of 2012 and beyond. clarko's cluster was gone.
this didnt happen with ross at freo after 2013 when they lost a grand final. they've clung onto exactly the same game plan ever since, because it almost worked in 2009/2010. it should have been painfully obvious with how hawthorn managed that game from the very first bounce, that what ross had wasnt going to cut it anymore. it was done. ever since, sides have dismantled freo when it counted through a short disposal game that cut through the outdated zone
after freo were sent packing from last years finals series, he finally after almost 7 years conceded that he had an issue with developing younger players and the coaches around him and that he needed to take a more managerial approach (you can read the interviews on this if you dont believe me). he also cited he needed to be more attacking and the game plan had to change. they had to get better in their disposal. it was like going back in time to 2011 when pretty much everyone but him had recognized this.
so then he goes about achieving this. the best assistant coaches he can bring in to achieve this is a bloke from the VFA that he last worked with at the saints back in 2008. then two ex players from hawthorn with no coaching experience at all, one is made a line coach from the get go (WTF!). he steps back and takes the managerial role. after 4 loses in a row, he concedes that the program has been a failure and he has to resume control. then his game plan reverts straight back to what he was using last year. the only change is he is playing the kids somewhat. i mean why???? surely if the year is a write off and you're in a rebuild, you start engineering the game plan to how you want it
its just utterly bizarre and show's he is incapable of adapting and learning and that freo cannot attract the assistant coaches he needs
the only staggering thing is there are people out there that still dont see this/it has gathered the attention from the media it should have
as grant thomas said when he read ross lyons interview in the last off-season. its concerning you have a senior coach with almost 10 years experience now identifying things he should have addressed in his 2/3rd year in the job
The game couldn't have changed to much if freo finished on top last year. That's a pretty good start to a finals campaign especially when people say the side wasn't that good. Have you actually thought he coaches the way he does because the sides really don't have anywhere near the best list? By the way Mark Stone is very experienced assistant coach.
All I know is Lyon inherited 2 lists that weren't top 4 material and made both of them top 2 material. That is fact. He has faults but so do most coaches. Lets wait and see what he does in the next few years before we write him off. He still was part of my best AFL/VFL experience since I followed the game so unlike most I thank the guy and think he is a very good coach.





