- Feb 28, 2011
- 14,166
- 23,678
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Manchester Utd, New York Rangers
Id much rather Grundy than Jackson to be honestThey'll be giving a fair chunk of that to the PiesIm guessing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Id much rather Grundy than Jackson to be honestThey'll be giving a fair chunk of that to the PiesIm guessing
Guess we will see how it pans out, if that helps them get Grundy and he hits top form then it will be win win for themFor a young lad that is still pretty raw as a KPP ans has massive upside. Ithink Melb got reamed, but getting Grundy you can see why they just did that trade...
And who needs a bloody good hair cutYou're joking arent you? 2 first rounders and a 2nd for a guy that had one good season
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Izak Rankinedone, but still no Bowes. Interesting...wonder what the hold up is...PLAYERCARDSTART23Izak Rankine
- Age
- 25
- Ht
- 179cm
- Wt
- 82kg
- Pos.
- M/F
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 13.0
- 3star
- K
- 9.0
- 3star
- HB
- 4.0
- 3star
- M
- 2.7
- 3star
- T
- 2.7
- 4star
- CL
- 1.7
- 4star
- D
- 13.0
- 3star
- K
- 9.0
- 4star
- HB
- 4.0
- 3star
- M
- 2.7
- 3star
- T
- 2.7
- 4star
- CL
- 1.7
- 4star
- D
- 13.0
- 4star
- K
- 9.0
- 4star
- HB
- 4.0
- 3star
- M
- 2.7
- 3star
- T
- 2.7
- 5star
- CL
- 1.7
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND
Talk is the the medi-sub is going to be scrapped for a fifth bench spot. Going to see a lot of teams playing two rucks if true.While I would take Jackson at Geelong, its because he would be a ruck upgrade on Stanley.
Is Jackson a ruck upgrade on Darcy? In my opinion he isn't. Is he a forward upgrade on Lobb? Stats suggest no.
Be interesting to see how Jackson is used next year. The only suggestion I have seen that makes sense is if they use Jackson in the role we used Blicavs but then does Jackson have the tank Blitz has?
While I would take Jackson at Geelong, its because he would be a ruck upgrade on Stanley.
Is Jackson a ruck upgrade on Darcy? In my opinion he isn't. Is he a forward upgrade on Lobb? Stats suggest no.
Be interesting to see how Jackson is used next year. The only suggestion I have seen that makes sense is if they use Jackson in the role we used Blicavs but then does Jackson have the tank Blitz has?
God these people are thick. He didn't want to play for the dumpster fire formerly known as the Essendon Football Club. Not even if they were offering a lifetime of future second round picks.
GC are quivering.What’s holding up the Bowes trade?
GC are quivering.
Danger pointed out that he would be one of those who deserved a premiership medal based on the amount he helped the team prepare for the GF. Each session for training, Stephens asked Danger, which opponent mid he wanted him (Stephens) to emulate. Sounds like someone absolutely dedicated to seeing his team win.I agree with the (strong) view that the cats won’t want him out. I had a question in my own mind as to whether the trades in (2 midfield and a top 10 pick prob a midfielde?) might prompt him to explore. Given we haven’t heard anything and he is away I think that is unlikely
Ceglar and Stanley would honestly smash opponents together.Talk is the the medi-sub is going to be scrapped for a fifth bench spot. Going to see a lot of teams playing two rucks if true.
Does this negate the Blitz advantage a little bit? Or just free him up to be a full time mid-tility*Ceglar and Stanley would honestly smash opponents together.
The pick with Bris ... It was R2(38), Fr2, R3(45), R3(55) , Fr4. <> R2 to move up 13 spots
Considering now we are going to get Bowes for Fr3 (which I think is very gettable as a trade if we needed to get a Fr3)...
Are we sure we have gone at this the right way?
18 for henry
R2, R3 and Fr2 for Bruhn
Fr3 for Bowes ..
View attachment 1531593
Apparently Wright wasn't going to accept anything less than a first rounder that was better than the Pick 17 Henry was drafted at, so probably wouldn't have worked anyway
Mackie has set it up so that we cannot give away FR1. So it's ended up as a take it or leave it for Henry.Apparently Wright wasn't going to accept anything less than a first rounder that was better than the Pick 17 Henry was drafted at, so probably wouldn't have worked anyway