We did for Deledio but different scenarioI can't see Geelong throwing Henry under the bus it's not the way we have rolled.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
We did for Deledio but different scenarioI can't see Geelong throwing Henry under the bus it's not the way we have rolled.
2023 Draft has a few underage superstars that would go early this yearIf you look at my earlier posts I said as much.... The last three year have seen cap dump trades if we have cap room we could easily pick up another player
... still there is no denying atm ... not much in the draft next year atm.
I don't think we were put through the ringer.That and the Kruger trade? .... Kruger we got put thru the ringer
With all these trade...its only in retrospect that you really know the real cost.
Deledio didn't have a brother playing for us.We did for Deledio but different scenario
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Getting pick 33 for Sav at this point would be going full Bobby Davis for mine. 'Fair dinkum unbelievable'. He's just about regressed year on year over the last few seasons. And he only cost us pick 43 in the first place.In isolation i think given sav is a depth player 33 is overs and we are doing well to get that. Will need to rookie a mature kpd though.
That's why you'd do it as a 3-way trade if you didn't trust them.I wouldnt trade sav until pies have agreed to do the henry deal otherwise just keep sav for depth.
True, I think he also sounded us out too late in the piece as wellDeledio didn't have a brother playing for us.
Bloke has broken down more than i have in the last 12 months...lol. soft tissue/hammy related.Wardlaw wont get outside top 5 no chance.
Gws take cadman its why they traded for 1.
North take 2 of wardlaw/tsatas (maybe both to pair oakleigh kids) or sheezel. Ess take whichever of the 3 port dont take. Gcs pick 5 becomes interesting i think they want hollands but 5 is early...maybe they go humphrey or they trade back. Doubt they risk clark.
Clark will get to hawks at 6 its just a matter of if they let him through to us.
That and the Kruger trade? .... Kruger we got put thru the ringer
With all these trade...its only in retrospect that you really know the real cost.
Bloke has broken down more than i have in the last 12 months...lol. soft tissue/hammy related.
So risking a top 3 pick is what i call fookin stupid.
That's why you'd do it as a 3-way trade if you didn't trust them.
Getting pick 33 for Sav at this point would be going full Bobby Davis for mine. 'Fair dinkum unbelievable'. He's just about regressed year on year over the last few seasons. And he only cost us pick 43 in the first place.
Totally agree we would have to rookie another somewhat capable KPD as depth, though.
I don't think we need a KPD as depth. I know it's not how we play our best footy but blitz can go back. If we want to keep blitz in his rolling really ruck roll then play Stanley back and bring Cegsy man in.Getting pick 33 for Sav at this point would be going full Bobby Davis for mine. 'Fair dinkum unbelievable'. He's just about regressed year on year over the last few seasons. And he only cost us pick 43 in the first place.
Totally agree we would have to rookie another somewhat capable KPD as depth, though.
Wardlaw wont get outside top 5 no chance.
Gws take cadman its why they traded for 1.
North take 2 of wardlaw/tsatas (maybe both to pair oakleigh kids) or sheezel. Ess take whichever of the 3 port dont take. Gcs pick 5 becomes interesting i think they want hollands but 5 is early...maybe they go humphrey or they trade back. Doubt they risk clark.
Clark will get to hawks at 6 its just a matter of if they let him through to us.
Port have no other picks this year and they cant trade futures so if they come for sav it will be 33. I agree thats overs for a depth player but id happily take it and rookie some sort of mature kpd.
Port have no other picks this year and they cant trade futures so if they come for sav it will be 33. I agree thats overs for a depth player but id happily take it and rookie some sort of mature kpd.
Blitz is absolute gold around the ball these days. Just must be retained there at all costs. And I'm not at all interested in any sort of semi-permanent role for Rhys down back.I don't think we need a KPD as depth. I know it's not how we play our best footy but blitz can go back. If we want to keep blitz in his rolling really ruck roll then play Stanley back and bring Cegsy man in.
What pick back other than 7 do you think we are getting for a Fr3?Could trade 25 and 33 for 21 (Brisbane) and offer that to pies with a pick back fr3 for Bowes?
It would be a lot of picks. But a fair component of them we were not ever realistically going to use. And I rate Ollie highly enough on talent to believe the deal will end up being worth it in the end.Pick 33 is a fair trade for Esava, but I wouldn’t want to trade him for a good pick then just throw that away for Henry. It’d be a lot of picks and Esava for Henry.
Could trade 25 and 33 for 21 (Brisbane) and offer that to pies with a pick back fr3 for Bowes?
Until of course we lose 1 or 2 of them... Like car insurance, only need it when things turn pear shaped.I don't think we need a KPD as depth. I know it's not how we play our best footy but blitz can go back. If we want to keep blitz in his rolling really ruck roll then play Stanley back and bring Cegsy man in.